EPT+ Show Spoiler [The Answer] +
that you are not very scummy or that you are town
TL Mafia LIV - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [The Answer] + | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Look how weak the cases are Look how easily the 5 player scumteam could swing the vote See how unlikely we are to hit mafia Lynch a player that will be anti town either way. Vote BillMurray | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
why did you arrive at this late hour agree with me that we should lynch BM and then place your vote on sinani who currently has no votes? we need to consolidate out votes. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
BM has also posted in another game since his last post here http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187&user=54241 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=329128&user=54241¤tpage=4 so we know he has been on the TL mafia sub-forum and chosen to not post. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Since "scummy" means that you think they "look like scum" the "scummiest playe"r must be the player that you "think looks the most like scum" and a solid scumread is a player that you think is scum. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12322601 | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On May 05 2012 06:44 Kurumi wrote: Day 1 Katina -2 DoYouHas slOosh Nova_Terra 5 Mementoss Kenpachi Blazinghand slOosh Bill Murray Mementoss 2 Eiii Nova_Terra blubbdavid: 0 Katina: 0 grush57: 2 Sinensis froggynoddy Sinensis: 1 ghost_403 Palmar: 0 BillMurray 10 PaqMan layabout johnnywup grush57 marvellosity SomethingAwesome papapanda Palmar layabout BlackRaven blubbdavid l10f might not be in here, he will be saved because he pmed me 9he has finals) Day 1 ends at 22:00 GMT (+00:00), ~15 minutes from this post http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/SK.Testie On May 05 2012 06:48 Blazinghand wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra On May 05 2012 06:51 slOosh wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra On May 05 2012 06:51 Bill Murray wrote: ##vote: nova_terra | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 05 2012 06:57 layabout wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 05 2012 06:44 Kurumi wrote: Day 1 Katina -2 DoYouHas slOosh Nova_Terra 5 Mementoss Kenpachi Blazinghand slOosh Bill Murray Mementoss 2 Eiii Nova_Terra blubbdavid: 0 Katina: 0 grush57: 2 Sinensis froggynoddy Sinensis: 1 ghost_403 Palmar: 0 BillMurray 10 PaqMan layabout johnnywup grush57 marvellosity SomethingAwesome papapanda Palmar layabout BlackRaven blubbdavid l10f might not be in here, he will be saved because he pmed me 9he has finals) Day 1 ends at 22:00 GMT (+00:00), ~15 minutes from this post http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/SK.Testie On May 05 2012 06:48 Blazinghand wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra On May 05 2012 06:51 slOosh wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra On May 05 2012 06:51 Bill Murray wrote: ##vote: nova_terra well this is embarrassing... | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 05 2012 07:04 Bill Murray wrote: well, layabout hopping on the lynch makes me really suspect him he would normally leave me around if he's town of my wagon, i would like you all to lynch layabout I am sick of leaving you around it has caused nothing but trouble | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
I think gonzaw posted a programme but i am not sure where. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 05 2012 07:38 blubbdavid wrote: food of chain manlots speedlots zealots . . . chargelots I will overthink the case of grush, Layabout is a better target anyway. why? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 05 2012 11:17 PaqMan wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 05 2012 05:43 layabout wrote: Katina few posts have been critical of the disruptive play at the beginning, and acted to stamp out the bad. Katina Implies that the "blub scumslip affair" is stupid (it was) by implying that the accusations are rather hastily made (which further implies that they are poorly thought out) katina points out that BH is being a big drama queen. Katina points out that the game is hours old and that there has not been time to contribute in response to BH's vote on her for not contributing. Criticises grush for sheeping a baseless vote. Points out how destructive the "lets all vote for no real reason" is and tells the perpetrators to stop. If Katrina does anything suspicious it is the way in which she puts attention on BM. She tells us that he tend to lurk when he is mafia that he posted earlier and is now lurking. He isn't lurking at the moment. Lurking is playing passively, posting infrequently or posting with consistently low content. BM is inactive in this game since these are his only posts: + Show Spoiler + On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote: I will extend the day and shorten the next night by one hour. Good luck and have fun. Nobody died yet. But don't worry. what and yet.... On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote: extended days?! hurray! Both of which of from the very beginning of the game Just curious, but what was the point of that post layabout? Nobody was discussing her so it seemed kind of random for you to make that analysis. On May 05 2012 05:15 slOosh wrote: Why is SA's post BS? And where does katina make posts indicative of intelligence and how does it show a town alignment? discussion of katina: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591170 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591786 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591832 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14592117 My post doesn't say why i thought she was town in fact i just wanted to say that her posts made sense and i didn't want to kill somebody that was making sense when there were so many players that weren't making sense or even playing the game. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
But: How is " i think that a player is intelligent i don't think we should lynch them" a hard defence? Does giving evidence as to why you think they are intelligent when asked and then saying that you felt something they did something scummy constitute a hard defence? Why did layabout react to 2 votes on layabout when grush was in the lead with 5 votes with hours left and 13-ish players were yet to vote? @Mementoss i thought we should lynch Palmar over "any other lurker" because he showed basically no interest in the lynch at all. Palmar is lazy as scum but when he town he usually bothers to do ... "stuff". | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14611146 ghost that post was in responses to a question, i already said that in this post I pushed a policy lynch on BM because when you have nothing to go on in the thread and very little time left you either no-lynch or kill a lurker. Both of these moves are last resorts that you should not set out to do. At the start of the day you should not be pushing either a no-lynch or a policy lynch but when the day is fruitless, they become valid options. I have already explained why i wanted to kill him specifically. That is all there was to to it. Regarding this BH is criticising a "hard defense of Katina" which i have already adressed. This is actually the reason I shot Palmar-- he wasn't acting like the typical active town Palmar. But why doesn't layabout write this right away? It seems to me that a TOWN layabout would try to explain himself before daybreak... after all, he'd be worried about being shot, right? See, this is what happened: layabout wanted to set up for a Palmar push D2. Palmar was acting weird for a town Palmar, and Layabout wanted to capitalize that by getting him lynched D2 based on Meta. This is scummy. In fact, this is scummy enough that we should lynch layabout. BH is also criticising me for saying that we should kill the player that he decided to shoot. BH is calling me scummy for saying that we should kill a scummy player. Not only is this contrived, but he is calling me scum for doing what we should all be doing as town. On May 06 2012 08:46 johnnywup wrote: I think it is condemning, scum over-reacts to things like that (at least i think, ive never actually played scum). Of course laya didn't know kat would be modkilled, which is why it is condemning. If we didn't know kat's flip, it wouldn't be bad for either of them. It's just a townie pushing his reads on another person he thinks is townie, right? Since kat flipped, no. I don't know, the flip makes me think laya is more scummy. At first i dismissed this point. Who is more likely to know if one of the mafia team is about to be modkilled? Members of the mafia team who can communicate privately and should know if their team mate is there (no) Members of town who can only see the thread and will have no idea who is watching the thread (yes) I don't see how me not knowing that katina would be modkilled implicates me in any way. As to me over-reacting, i do this because i have been mislynched on day 1 twice by 5 or 6 players when town had votes spread all over the place. In game of thrones mafia and in bastard mafia. It is in the interest's of every player to defend themselves and doing so is not scummy. have i missed anything? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 07 2012 03:10 SomethingAwesome wrote: I'm beginnging to like you Lay. Now find me scum! =) What do you think about blubb? I think he is fishy... here: On May 06 2012 19:50 blubbdavid wrote: I see, Blazinghand is switching cases so it looks like he doesn't sheep l10f. Well, jdup has made a good post regarding layabout's behaviour It took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled. This is a strange thing to assert when as a townie you do not know who scum are and if they thought that Katina was coming back or not. Also when he votes for me he emphasises that it is to get me to answer his question. On May 06 2012 20:32 blubbdavid wrote: layabout is scum. The question is: why would scum push BM? layabout was pushing BM so hard it was not even funny. Ok: layabaout, why were you so fucking desperate in pushing BM? till then, ##vote layabout + Show Spoiler + He begins by saying that i am scum. If he believes this then surely that should be the reason for his vote. By saying that he wants a response he gives himself a way to back out of pushing me. If he truly believes that i am scum then he would have no reason to do this. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 07 2012 03:28 Blazinghand wrote: False. I am criticizing you for saying we should kill Palmar, and not posting a case against him until 9 hours, after daybreak. Did you actually read my case? Yes, my criticism is based on HOW you did what you did, not what you did. Is it really typical layabout play to make a 1-sentence accusation halfway through the night then not follow up with a case until after daybreak? Cause I had some respect for your town play... Yesterday, between the hours of (UK time) 5pm and 1 am i was otherwise engaged.+ Show Spoiler + the FA cup final was on Now try think of a way to write that without it sounding lame. | ||
| ||
