EPTTL Mafia LIV - Page 16
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/q3Obu.png) | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:24 Mementoss wrote: And posting how every post and action is worthless is just as helpful? Lol. If you read my posts I wasn't pushing a scum slip. I was stating that the idea of these "scumslips" aren't indicative of some bodies role. And although they can be useful in some situations at the moment, its probably just someone who has played plenty of games where blue = power role, green = vanilla, red = scum, and it was most likely just a auto-reaction by blubb. Why are you being so presumptuous? I never claimed to be making a contribution. It was my way of expressing my disappointment in each and every one of you. | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
##Vote: Palmar | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:47 DoYouHas wrote: Palmar's confrontational and empty 1 liners make it impossible to get a read on him. (anti-town) He is shutting down conversation instead of fostering it. (anti-town) I have no interest in keeping someone around who I won't be able to get a handle on and who I think is hurting the town. ##Vote: Palmar What? You're voting for someone because you're not good enough to work out his alignment? :3 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:59 BlackRaven wrote: What? You're voting for someone because you're not good enough to work out his alignment? :3 That's not what he said, why wilfully represent his post? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:01 marvellosity wrote: That's not what he said, why wilfully represent his post? I also read it as hassy stated and as someone who also has a chaotic posting style there is generally at least 1 scum on these easy "anti town" lynches just trying to slip in and look useless. -D | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
which can hardly be considered of much value. Palmar is a big boy. He can defend himself, and you should let him. | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:44 layabout wrote: Why are you being so presumptuous? I never claimed to be making a contribution. It was my way of expressing my disappointment in each and every one of you. I'm not being presumptuous, I'm just saying you saying " Im dissapointed in everyone for not doing anything " while you yourself are doing even less than others, is hypocritical. | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
| ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
| ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
Palmar looks like a good lynch candidate too, because he 1) isn't townielike, 2) isn't making much sense 3) voted for me without reasoning. I assume we still have 24h+ for voting? | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:30 DoYouHas wrote: Oh, and btw. You are defending Palmar by attacking the person going after him. You discredit me and Palmar no longer has a need to respond. This is wrong - D | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
How is fitting the definition of a chainsaw defense wrong? | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:47 DoYouHas wrote: Palmar's confrontational and empty 1 liners make it impossible to get a read on him. (anti-town) He is shutting down conversation instead of fostering it. (anti-town) I have no interest in keeping someone around who I won't be able to get a handle on and who I think is hurting the town. ##Vote: Palmar Firstly, confrontational and empty is an oxymoron in Mafia. Confrontation brings discussion. Discussion good. Discussion not make posts empty. Secondly, not having a read on someone does not make him anti-town. It makes him just another player in the game. It sure as hell isn't a reason to vote him. Thirdly.....well see the first point about your second one. He got you talking didn't he? :3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:47 DoYouHas wrote: How is fitting the definition of a chainsaw defense wrong? If a player ever uses a chainsaw defence as an actual defence they are scum there is no leeway about it and its bad play all around. People should never use other peoples arguments to make them appear either townie or scum its just bad play and they deserve to be lynched if they do so. Me and Hassy both still expect things from Palmar at some stage we just both dislike you at the moment. -D | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:39 blubbdavid wrote: I am still waiting for grush to be useful. But going through his filter in other games, my hopes will be smited. Palmar looks like a good lynch candidate too, because he 1) isn't townielike, 2) isn't making much sense 3) voted for me without reasoning. I assume we still have 24h+ for voting? Common atleast my useless posts are funny unlike yours. Plus, you didn't understand the situation of that game I played(I'm the same role this game too). Anyways, I'm not sure what to make of the last 3 pages. It is full of useless posts and spam and Bill Murray didn't even start yet. Several posts saying nothing except that "I'm town, trust me i gotta go.... eat?" (Like this post except im not hungry atm :D) For my reasoning of Katina vote, the game just started and blazinghand was accusing Katina for his scumminess, and I agreed so I voted for him, plus I wanted to get the ball rolling. Granted, I realize now this was a dumbshit move that was scummy,and that is my horrible reasoning for it. If you don't like it, Sorry. I would vote you blubbdavid, but I have enough people witchhunting me now.(And I didn't even rage on ladder how unlucky am I?) Though, I could just filter and quote everything and that would get the job done. | ||
| ||
