EPTTL Mafia LIV - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
- D | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
Till now, I have have defended myself better than grush, but papanda is willing to forgive grush for his action because he could be a semi-lurker. Like SA pointed out, reading minds for others, especially at such an early stage of the game is scummy. Palmar: his play here compared to Liar Game Mafia is opposite. In one game he is interested and active, here, well... Two options: 1. He has no special role here and therefore immediately lost interest. 2. He is scum, scumming scum. (Note: he is sheeping Kenpachi here, whereas in the other game he is playing king lol) grush is without doubt the scummiest player here, putting up a strong (read:nonexistant) defense. ##vote grush57 | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
SomethingAwesome
Kiribati58 Posts
what do you think of papapanda? | ||
|
SomethingAwesome
Kiribati58 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
SomethingAwesome
Kiribati58 Posts
what do you think of papapanda? -mattchew | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
|
papapanda
Taiwan326 Posts
On May 03 2012 21:46 blubbdavid wrote: papapanda, unable to even graps that he has a bit more time than just one day, ready to sacrifice me although there are better options like grush. Till now, I have have defended myself better than grush, but papanda is willing to forgive grush for his action because he could be a semi-lurker. Like SA pointed out, reading minds for others, especially at such an early stage of the game is scummy. ##vote grush57 *Looks hard to find blubbdavid's defense* On May 03 2012 08:11 blubbdavid wrote: The confusing thing is that in a sense vanilla townies are also blue roles, just without power. I wanted to ask Ken whether he had a powerrole or not. A 1.2 line defense? Only a little better than grush. Some of us are obviously more seasoned than others. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't I play with you before in my first game? The way I see it is when we have two suspicious guys, I would lynch the more experienced person because there is less possibility that his mistakes are due to the fact that he was careless or ignorant. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
I'll post something useful when I get home. | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On May 03 2012 22:35 Zealos wrote: Hi guys, I'm at work, and a BLU soldier :3 I'll post something useful when I get home. Not depressed, scumslip | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
And no, I have never played with you before. And I am only one game ahead of grush. And I would wait for grush posting his defense. I know that in your mind you already decided to definitely lynch me. It will be fun to see how you will come to grushs rescue. | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On May 03 2012 14:51 Sinensis wrote: I can't help but think grush57's move was too dumb for town to make. "2 dumb 2 be scum" isn't a pardon. It doesn't even make sense. No, it makes sense, but it isnt a pardon, i agree. Im null on him, not finding him townie because of him being too dumb. And mafia are much more careful than town. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 03 2012 18:54 Palmar wrote: ##Vote Blubbdavid On May 03 2012 21:02 Palmar wrote: Kenpachi, is this a good vote? On May 03 2012 21:47 Palmar wrote: I like grush, he seems funny. On May 03 2012 21:55 Palmar wrote: Shut your whore mouth Mattchew On May 03 2012 21:46 blubbdavid wrote: Palmar: his play here compared to Liar Game Mafia is opposite. In one game he is interested and active, here, well... Two options: 1. He has no special role here and therefore immediately lost interest. 2. He is scum, scumming scum. (Note: he is sheeping Kenpachi here, whereas in the other game he is playing king lol) I'm not overly willing for "it's Palmar" to be an excuse for this behaviour. | ||
|
froggynoddy
United Kingdom452 Posts
On May 03 2012 23:02 Mementoss wrote: For those people who think im just spamming, I'm just trying to make the point that scumslips aren't a serious indicator of alignment. Scumslips should be used as supporting evidence, backed up by solid behavioural analysis. If we are going to lynch on the things such as scumslips on day 1, I would rather just kill BM or Kenpachi. It would be just as useful. I'm not serious about actually policy lynching them, but we cannot let them "lurk and live" till end game because its their "meta". It causes really awkward end game situations, where you can only guess their alignment. Though I sympathise with the thought process I'm pretty sure we should lynch whoever we feel is most scummy, that means taking into consideration lurkiness/quality of posting. Killing someone based on their meta is equally as flawed as letting someone live because of their meta. I'm not saying don't use it as a factor, just to bare in mind that the 'lynch a bad townie' logic is wrong and every game I've played where this has happened has ended in tears. | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On May 03 2012 23:26 froggynoddy wrote: Though I sympathise with the thought process I'm pretty sure we should lynch whoever we feel is most scummy, that means taking into consideration lurkiness/quality of posting. Killing someone based on their meta is equally as flawed as letting someone live because of their meta. I'm not saying don't use it as a factor, just to bare in mind that the 'lynch a bad townie' logic is wrong and every game I've played where this has happened has ended in tears. Of course we lynch most scumminess, I'm just giving a hint to anyone who has shooting powers. Cause these types of players stay in the back of peoples minds with a light shade of red for the majority of the game. | ||
| ||
