EPTWhy would the SK listen to you?
You're being stupid.
Wheel of Fortune Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
Why would the SK listen to you? You're being stupid. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
On April 24 2012 08:28 prplhz wrote: I was late because I had forgotten that I even had it and I didn't know if I wanted to lynch MrZentor. I decided on that I wanted to lynch him about 30 minutes before deadline and then I copy/pasted the case but then I noticed that I hadn't originally saved points 5-11 and I had to rewrite those. So the analysis was a little late but meh. Medic/Jailer on Radfield tonight. Vigilante/SK on MrZentor. Just curious like. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:11 MrZentor wrote: Hey guys! Here are my thoughts. Forumrite and Prphlz are being stupid for attacking me even though it's obvious that I'm innocent. I have a feeling scum would switch over to an easier lynch such as Marv or Sbrubbles. Everybody who keeps repeating how innocent I am is annoying for being ridiculously ridiculously redundant. I feel at this point talking about how innocent I am is like talking about what the masons should do. We need to do four things. 1. Decide if we have a lynch or not- I feel we should because of what somebody said about it not helping us all if we don't lynch somebody, because we'll end up losing on the same day anyways. 2. Decide if we want to lynch a lurker or an active person- I would like to lynch a lurker, because currently there isn't any solid case on any active person, and I would prefer to lose a lurker over an active person. 3. Lower the number of possible lynch victims- I believe right now 6 different people are being voted for. That means scum have complete control of the lynch; we need to have 1-2 suspects, or we're not going to get a good lynch. 4. We need to decide who to lynch. I'll be back soon with a suitable lurker to lynch. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Too. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I'M + Show Spoiler + NOT + Show Spoiler + SCUM Any other questions? | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
On April 25 2012 06:20 Forumite wrote: MrZentor, why do you think prplhz is scum? The things he does that you think are suspicious are not suspicous to me, at least not coming from him. I don't think prphlz is scum anymore. I posted this. On April 24 2012 06:11 MrZentor wrote: Hey guys! Here are my thoughts. Forumrite and Prphlz are being stupid for attacking me even though it's obvious that I'm innocent. I have a feeling scum would switch over to an easier lynch such as Marv or Sbrubbles. Everybody who keeps repeating how innocent I am is annoying for being ridiculously ridiculously redundant. I feel at this point talking about how innocent I am is like talking about what the masons should do. We need to do four things. 1. Decide if we have a lynch or not- I feel we should because of what somebody said about it not helping us all if we don't lynch somebody, because we'll end up losing on the same day anyways. 2. Decide if we want to lynch a lurker or an active person- I would like to lynch a lurker, because currently there isn't any solid case on any active person, and I would prefer to lose a lurker over an active person. 3. Lower the number of possible lynch victims- I believe right now 6 different people are being voted for. That means scum have complete control of the lynch; we need to have 1-2 suspects, or we're not going to get a good lynch. 4. We need to decide who to lynch. I'll be back soon with a suitable lurker to lynch. I posted that I posted it. Now you're making me post that I posted that I posted it and posted it. Anymore questions? | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
On April 25 2012 06:32 prplhz wrote: Maybe I would focus less on MrZentor if he gave a shit about proving his innocence to me by answering my very specific questions, but he's blatantly not doing that and I don't think I can think of a single reason a town player would do that. Scum players would do it because they haven't a fucking clue. Guy has no reads and all of his posting has been shitting on me and Forumite, I have no idea how you can think that that is "strongly town aligned". Being an asshole for a reason is townie, being an asshole for no reason is contrived, fake, and scummy. This post made me wonder if I had accidentally skipped over his "very specific questions". So I decided to skim over his filter. Guess what? + Show Spoiler + That's right. Besides the first four questions at the beginning of the game which I answered well, he only asked the following of me. Now, will you tell me why you decided to be all piss and vinegar in the beginning of this game? Because I'm really interested in that. On April 24 2012 06:39 prplhz wrote: MrZentor ..... TELL ME WHY THE HELL YOU DECIDED THAT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO BE ALL AGGRESSIVE IN THE BEGINNING OF THIS GAME RIGHT NOW everybody agrees that your case was weak and i think it looks really fake, full of dumb contradictions and grasping in the thin air, tell me why you decided to be all pissed off and make bad cases instead of playing your usual game? I'm also going to vote marvellosity just to get a lynch. I prefer lynches to no lynches and I don't think that marvellosity is clear townie at all. So, his "very specifics questions" ends up being him getting angry because I won't reveal why I'm playing this style. Now stop complaining, Prphlz; it's annoying. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
##Vote MrZentor | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
I'll wait a minute or two. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
So in a way, I guess you're saving my life. Thank you! | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
You should try it sometime. Also, I tried to unvote myself and vote for no lynch yesterday, but I accidentally forgot to bold it. -.- | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
Anyways, masons need to claim before I'm gonna point out the scum. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
2. The case on prphlz was like 3 hours into the game. Of course it's not going to be the best case ever, but I think considering the time is was pretty good. 3. My scum reads will be wildly more accurate if I have their claim, so naturally I would want the masons to claim first. 4. You shouldn't lynch me, because I'm a vanilla town. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
SamuelLJackson- dead Radfield/Ace- claim MrZentor- me I'm less sure of these people's innocence, but I feel that it's unlikely that they're scum. prphlz- he seems genuinely frustrated with me and how I appear "scummy" + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 06:39 prplhz wrote: MrZentor ..... TELL ME WHY THE HELL YOU DECIDED THAT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO BE ALL AGGRESSIVE IN THE BEGINNING OF THIS GAME RIGHT NOW everybody agrees that your case was weak and i think it looks really fake, full of dumb contradictions and grasping in the thin air, tell me why you decided to be all pissed off and make bad cases instead of playing your usual game? I'm also going to vote marvellosity just to get a lynch. I prefer lynches to no lynches and I don't think that marvellosity is clear townie at all. Forumrite- he has been pushing my lynch regardless of town's opinions, and also seems like he actually thinks I'm scum (lol) marv- he's playing the same noobie town he did in SS; there are also several posts which I feel scum wouldn't post + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 05:32 marvellosity wrote: Because I'm new and bad, obviously + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote: I would like to note that there has been no opposition to the growing bandwagon of my lynch when clearly scum has had the options to direct the vote almost anywhere with a maximum of 2 votes on any one person. Bluelightz- he has been going against town's lynch of me today and also gave good reasons on why I'm not scum (see Sum of All Fears); this could be a scum move to get town credit after I am lynched, but I feel that isn't probable considering how he's been doing it strongandbig- his time for the time pad was extremely simple and could only help town; he also considers the idea that I'm sk-I don't think scum would ever consider something so ridiculously idiotic I know what you're thinking: "MrZentor, we already agreed throwing around town reads isn't helpful." Well, we only have five people left, so in this case it IS helpful. Even if I let one scum slip into my town reads, the odds of the people below being scum are still much higher than if I randomly picked a person. Of these, I'm confident at least two are scum. Snarfs- He seemed pretty suspicious because he asked so many questions but presented so little analysis, but I am less convinced of his scumminess because of him trying to find who people consider scummy besides me. VisceraEyes- I have a null read on him; the seemingly random absences are suspicious, but I don't see any good in thread evidence against him. Phagga- He has posted a lot of fluffy posts, and he accused me but switched to an easier lynch after it became obvious that I wasn't to be lynched Fluffy post! + Show Spoiler + On April 23 2012 16:22 phagga wrote: ok, catching up. game mechanics stuff: - Hydras should sign. Everything else lowers transparency for town. - After reading all the pros and cons, I'd support a mason claim day 2. Reason: Many Vets + 2 masons = too many targets to handle for scum. D3 might be too late because of counterclaim (depends on nightkills and SK situation). On to more important stuff in no particular order: Mr. Zentor: I don't like how his "really long post" was actually not long at all, but only full of quotes. If we ignore the quotes, the post was quite short. So why announce it as long? His case on prplhz was weak, and when asked a second time why he thought that prplhz was still scummy, he never answered. His style is unnecessarily aggresive. VisceraEyes: His Filter shows 5 ingame posts, which is more than I have, but unlike me he is notorious for being very active borderline on spamming, trying to direct people and generally being helpful to town. He is completely lacking these features this game. His townread post is suspicious, I can't remember him making townlists like this in the last games? His behaviour currently reminds of the Bastard game we just were in, where he was SK. Ace: I don't like how he has basically been talking about game mechanics and shown no interest in hunting scum. However, I've read some games where he was in (last was space station) and I think this is part of his D1 play? Not entirely sure. Radfield: He would not have shown up in this list was it not for sbrubbles points. I think they are very legit, and I look forward to Radfields reaction. Switching to another target because I'm not getting lynched; also, I think a town would have pushed me harder to answer his question. He would also get frustrated with me. (See Prphlz) + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 05:31 phagga wrote: I still would have liked an answer from Zentor, looks like I won't get one. Also most people do no longer seem willing to lynch him. VE slowly gets better, however i don't really agree with his initial lynch targets. Marvellosity is looking worse. The fact that he is just blatantly sheeping s&b without trying to put a little effort into his vote after a day of complete apathy to scumhunting looks suspicious enough. ##Vote: marvellosity Sbrubbles- He switched easily from VE to marv; he also sheeps everybody else on my lynch today. I feel like phagga by far looks the scummiest. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
VE better have an excellent response. | ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Or blatant lack of it. | ||
| ||
