I'll have more time for this one :D:D
Bastard Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I'll have more time for this one :D:D | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Also, please stop spoiling SoIaF, we have to read everything in mafias... :/ | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 09:11 Hassybaby wrote: I vote C_C for trying to get is to mass claim I did no such thing. Twisting my words like that is pretty scum bro. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
So why does Drazerk keep saying it does? ##Vote Drazerk | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 06:16 layabout wrote: Put a bullet in Bluelightz and i will hold you On April 10 2012 06:38 VisceraEyes wrote: layabout, do you dislike Bluelightz? Do you think Bluelightz is in the scumteam that you're speculating doesn't exist? Why would you want me to shoot Bluelightz? Something about this VE-layabout interaction seems off. VE's questions seem somewhat inappropriate compared to the discussion. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 13:38 johnnywup wrote: ok we've re-rated VE's questions rated R. DO you think it's appropriate now? No, I mean it seems forced. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 14:15 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm just curious to know why Bluelightz is all. That seemed pretty specific for so early. Were you not interested in the answers to those questions Cheese? I wasn't no. There hasn't been much reason to legitimately want to vig yet. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 01:17 Macheji wrote: @ Bluelightz . Quoted off me, check my filter. I had this on my mind since yesterday. I just made it more clearer this time. The reason for witch i can't go 100% in with this is because, in my mind, after 1 day of talking i just can't gather enough "evidence" on a person to be 100% sure of something. There are just not enough facts tbh, and this is the only reason i said that i still keep an open mind. But i back my claim up... In my mind, layabout is the person i suspect most.... closely to the tought that there aren't any bad guys, only townies separated into different interest groups ( check my post from before ). If there is nothing to change my mind until the day of the lynch, i will vote for layabout. This seems to have a large focus on the defensive... Facts? Evidence? 100% sure? On day 1? On April 11 2012 05:40 Macheji wrote: Oh and before bluelightz starts accusing me of sheeping or whatever it's called again. I know i used Drazerk's point. I added some details so other people don't have to start checking all the forums for the times. I also said it to show you guys what determined me to cast my vote and to reply to layabout's On April 11 2012 05:45 Macheji wrote: We just showed you tbh. It's all Occam's razor here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor ). And you being innocent has way more assumptions than you beeing guilty in my eyes . More pre-emptive defence. Why would a townie be so scared of being called out? Given the odds of being scum tend to range from 20-25%, this use of probabiliy seems suss. Not to mention the use of probablility at all, it seems to just be more excusing himself His fliter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599&user=234970 ##Vote: Macheji | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
1) + Show Spoiler [strongandbig] + On April 10 2012 14:48 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Hey, strongandbig, why are you obsessed with the sleeper cell agents? Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal? On April 11 2012 07:54 layabout wrote: I think Strongandbig is a third party. His posting History this game is the following: I want to /in /in I am going for "bastard meta" /confirm Is Darzek claiming broken shell? oh btw i haven't seen lost 37 "!" you a sleeper cell? Contrived twitpic nonsense "Im Tovn" dont trust ppl I looked at the lsot wiki, maybe everyone in town is a survivor? I think BM is a smurf and he is lurking, so i am going to pressure him, aren't i useful 2) + Show Spoiler [Macheji] + On April 11 2012 08:08 Cyber_Cheese wrote: This seems to have a large focus on the defensive... Facts? Evidence? 100% sure? On day 1? More pre-emptive defence. Why would a townie be so scared of being called out? Given the odds of being scum tend to range from 20-25%, this use of probabiliy seems suss. Not to mention the use of probablility at all, it seems to just be more excusing himself. His filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599&user=234970 ##Vote: Macheji 3) VE, for getting me killed day 1 last game, and not being nearly as active as in any other game I've seen him. 4) My target. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 16:38 johnnywup wrote: oh, figured it was majority. Then to keep layabout more likely to be lynched: ##vote Layabout sheep | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 18:43 phagga wrote: Hey Bagmanager, where have you been? Did you actually read the thread? It has been explained pretty well why some people want layabout dead. And why whould you want that? Care to elaborate before you go hardcore lurking again? Explained pretty well? There's hardly anything worth mention... Why are you trying to excuse peoples sheeping? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote: @ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh... Newbie card, entirely defensive play, no accusations/original thoughts... A much more solid lynch than layabout. This time, you've been caught already, but next time you roll scum, you don't have to defend yourself from everything like this. If the argument is you defend yourself too much, form some opinions and state them. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
TOWN WE ARE PLAYING THE STOP BEING RETARDED SHEEP GAME On April 11 2012 19:33 Macheji wrote: Anything worth mention .... What are you talking about... He has the most things worth mentioning about. I'll summerise it for you one last time. 1. He proposed 4 people to get lynched so far. The last one beeing me for "missuse" of Occam's Razor ( in reality it's because i'm making a case against him ) 2. He lied about posts timing in his "kill bluelightz" posts 3.When people were starting to make a case against him he done this : ... Our claims were preatty clear, we were serious, and transparent, well , how can you EVEN do that. He ends it with "thread is trash" in order to diminish the last page's importance ( the last pages were about why should we lynch him ) 4. Then Ok, am i the only one tottaly confused by this... What exactly prooves he's a third party... I find that post bullshit. AND it's 20 minutes after the "thread is bullshit " post. I think that post was made in order to distract the topic from " let's lynch layabout" to ... are there third parties, who is this strongandbig guy etc. Let me get this straight: He was looking for viable lynch targets, mistook at what time he posted on a 'kill bluelights' thing that wasnt even serious in the first place, asked for a real reason to be lynched, and pointed out a non contributing player. OH MY GOD WTF LYNCH HIM!!!! /sarcasm | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 21:40 layabout wrote: Lets assume we are all survivors or town. Town are not mafia. Survivors are not mafia. + Show Spoiler [Filters] + 1 - Bluelightz 2 - johnnywup 3 - phagga 4 - Hassybaby 5 - Drazerk 6 - GreYMisT 7 - VisceraEyes 8 - strongandbig 9 - Macheji 10- Jackal58 11- layabout 12- BagManager 13- Cyber_Cheese 14- Eiii 15- Sbrubbles Very likely survivor: Johnnywub + Show Spoiler + he claims it when mafia would not be sure if there were many survivors and when there was no real need for him to claim it strongandbig + Show Spoiler + he speculates that everyone is a survivor, i also think he is 3rd party. Drazerk + Show Spoiler + based on his wincon being to keep himself alive On April 11 2012 07:26 Drazerk wrote: Myself, Macheji, Jackal58 or GreYMisT Go There was also this "be nice to survivors posts" On April 10 2012 23:28 Drazerk wrote: Which annoys me because if someone claims survivor you should just ignore them instead of lynching them day 1 On April 10 2012 23:44 Drazerk wrote: don't even like vigs targetting survivors Just leave em be >.> Also all three are acting like they do not care about lyching mafia. They are acting like they received a 3rd party role and then decided to mess around. A sensible townie knows that survivors can win without town and will pay less attention to what someone that claims survivor says. Likewise a sensible survivor will realise the value in getting people to listen to them and would try to avoid claiming survivor. Probably survivor Cyber Cheese+ Show Spoiler + On April 10 2012 09:11 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Thought: Everyone posts their wincon. Agree/Disagree? explanation coming when i regain PC acess Hassababy + Show Spoiler + explanation coming when i regain PC acess phagga + Show Spoiler + based on his wincon being to keep himself alive On April 11 2012 07:55 phagga wrote: I got me, Cyber_Cheese, layabout, jackal58 or sbrubbles. Seriously, I'm not sure what to think of the layabout thing. I mean, there was a alot of stupid banter at the start of the game, and I never took his posts about bluelightz seriously. I am quite surprised that so many people jump on that. On the other side, his reaction is a bit lacking. So, yeah. But lynching him for this? i don't know... Still, I also don't like how Drazerk just voted layabout before there was anything to vote him for and then tried to cover up his vote with stuff layabout said AFTER he voted him. Also, there are a few people lurking, I'm mainly looking at Eiii and Bagmanager here. Also VE seems really tame compared to other games. Town Jackal + Show Spoiler + Jackal is probably the most responsible for for the wincon claims being shared, he claimed this On April 11 2012 07:33 Jackal58 wrote: Hmmmmm phagga, Sbrubbles, Hassybaby or Drazerk He is probably telling the truth because of these posts On April 11 2012 07:29 Jackal58 wrote: If you're smart enough to figure it out I just told you what I was. Him doing this as mafia just does not seem right. Jackal is also quite a lazy player and i don't think he would bother to do this when there was no need for him to do so as mafia. Layabout which leaves us with: Greymist Bluelightz Viscera Eyes Bagmanger Eiii Sbrubbles I am fairly sure that Blue and Grey are town but you will need to check for yourself. Greymist seems very concernned about people not listening to him + Blue's tone indicates that he is thinking about who he thinks might be scum. so the mafia are likely in here: Viscera Eyes Bagmanger Eiii Sbrubbles Can't help but noticed you missed Macheji | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 12 2012 07:53 Drazerk wrote: all survivors should just claim to be honest there is 0 reason not to as a survivor I disagree. We should kill all the claiming survivors so mafia don't nk us as easily. It's not like we can verify if a person is scum or survivor, so it doesn't actually help us find scum. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [Successful Day 2] + | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 12 2012 19:36 Bluelightz wrote: Oh god........... what the hell happened with Macheji Lolllllllll Anyway, I have my suspicion on a certain someone. Another completely useless post. Who? Why? [spoiler=Me] On April 11 2012 20:57 Bluelightz wrote: My case is fucking short yayyyyy Okay first point, he's not posting useless stuff Both questions, provide no fucking information on what s&b's alignment is. Second and last(lol) point, He pushed too far on Macheji, I think that Macheji finally cracked as town when he well sorta raged, Like I said in my previous post he seemed geniuinely mad so therefore he is town. ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese I should have thought to rebut this sooner. I just dismissed it as stupid at the time. Pushed too far on Macheji? Exactly how did I do that? When is too far? If you find someone looking like complete scum, do you just let the rest of town completely ignore them? I ask two questions aimed at getting strongandbig to post stuff relevant to the current game, how does that make me a better lynch candidate than the person you had been pursuing all game? Furthermore, he's just suddenly town now? This is his filter What exactly makes him seem like a townie to you? To date, he's thrown down a sheep vote, and essentially spent all his attention of defending himself instead of scum hunting, even when called out on it. Scum buddies? I think so! | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 21:40 layabout wrote: Probably survivor Cyber Cheese+ Show Spoiler + On April 10 2012 09:11 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Thought: Everyone posts their wincon. Agree/Disagree? explanation coming when i regain PC acess I was surprised someone worked it out on day 1. On April 13 2012 07:38 Sbrubbles wrote: Well, I can't see Drazerk as lying at this point. The "kill someone" wincons are never alone, acording to the OP, so he has other wincons which he can only hope to further if he's alive. Thus he would never lie in such a manner, knowing we're gonna lynch him tomorrow if he's lying. ##vote Cyber_Cheese For now, I'm mostly basing my vote on Drazerk, but Macheji, VE and Blue had cases on C_C and I'll try to expand on that later. OK, so you guys know my wincon now. Ask yourselves: Are you happy with having the lynch decided at the start of day 2? Furthermore, is Johnnywup (Claimed survivor) a worse lynch than me? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 06:53 Drazerk wrote: Also CC says he has to kill a target but his win con has no targets. Further proof he is the SK I don't seem to remember claiming that. Can you link it? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I hadn't say I had to kill the target, it's just a personal goal. I was given a fake win-con, to protect Macheji/VE/Sbrubbles/Bagmanager, and to kill Greymist. I figured I'd follow through on the kill for the shits and giggles. I suppose I can't now... (How to use linebreak tags?) On April 10 2012 18:16 phagga wrote: There is no wincondition that Mafia wins if they outnumber town. The way it is stated, that list is final. + Show Spoiler + On April 06 2012 18:07 Forumite wrote: - Winconditions: Each player has one or more of the following winconditions. Wincondition (4) is always combined with at least one other wincondition. (1) You win if there are no Scum or SKs alive at the end of the game. (2) You win if at least one of the players named in your role-PM are alive until the end of the game. (3) You win if you are alive at the end of the game. (4) You do not win if a player named in your role-PM is alive at the end of the game. If at any time there is no way you can win, then you become a broken shell of a man and lose all your abilities, any remaining secret messages and your vote, although you may still post in the game if you want to. You will also no longer receive secret messages sent to you. You are still alive until lynched or nightkilled, and still count as a living player in every other regard. The same thing happens to anyone who goes inactive, cheats, fail to vote or otherwise qualify for modkilling (except they are not allowed to post). So I guess Mafia has the Wincondition that at the End of the Game (which is still to be announced) some people either need to be alive or dead. On April 10 2012 18:36 Hassybaby wrote: Makes me think that there are only a bunch of SKs and assassin survivors, and town wins when they're dead. Maybe that means there isn't a Mafia team. Also, stop trying to apply logic to Drazerk. That's like asking Kenpachi to make a credible case on someone. Now, on it's own it's a decent assumption, but it's his second best post to date, (after this). The fact he's found need to specifically reply to that mechanic suggests to me he's a sk. Still not so bad. On April 13 2012 06:03 Hassybaby wrote: Ok, that convinces me that there is no Mafia team in this game. two survivors and two town have flipped. That still leaves 9 people. Some bias appears to be at work. On April 10 2012 09:11 Hassybaby wrote: I vote C_C for trying to get is to mass claim On April 11 2012 08:05 Hassybaby wrote: Wait, are we seriously mass claiming? On April 11 2012 08:13 Hassybaby wrote: As long as its not a mass claim, I'm cool with it. We could make an interesting chart to link people up. Objecting to the idea of claiming, but all too willing to create 'content' by getting other people to claim. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Don't be sheep lads. I'm not going to say I'm a bad lynch. At some point, any good town should strongly consider it. Don't let that be an excuse to waste day 2 with my lynch pre-determined creating no discussion. Furthermore, if multiple people are in a similar situation, start with the one that is the least helpful. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 09:43 Eiii wrote: Between this:which you haven't refuted, and this: Seems to suggest that the survivors need to work together somehow. But you don't really seem in on that, which makes you out more to be SK than survivor. Also, I thought we were going to get game-end conditions today? "You win if You survive until the end of the game." Judging by the rest of my role pm, survivors don't have to work together at all. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 17:34 johnnywup wrote: I don't understand what you mean. It came with a different role PM that you could claim? A fake win-con, not the whole pm. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 18:47 Bluelightz wrote: Fuck this, with my case im guessing im going to vote C_C. ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese Okay certain someone is VE. Sheep. Make the case anyway, kgo. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Vote: Viscera Eyes | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 13 2012 21:45 Drazerk wrote: The layabout lynch was good for town now we know the set up. Judging by the amount of conversation that day, It left a lot to be desired. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Especially given that you have a Secret Message. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 14 2012 02:07 VisceraEyes wrote: Because Jackal is experienced and I can trust his take on the setup regardless of his alignment. *shrug* Feel free to lynch the piss out of me tomorrow if you want - but in the meantime I'm going to be trying to find scum with/for you so the end of the game comes faster. Obviously from my perspective it's a waste of a lynch because I know that I'm not scum, so you're not doing anything to help town by removing me...but I don't expect you to take my word for it. So yeah, that's where we're at. You say you're going to do that, but you haven't done anything of the sort yet. You've seemed perfectly willing to sit back and let other survivors die so far. Why should town believe that's going to change? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 14 2012 08:12 Drazerk wrote: There is no scum we know this Do we? For all we know, there's just no VT's. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:39 Drazerk wrote: And guess that you had to protect no one after jonny's claim? It wouldn't matter, as long as I flipped neutral it'd just be your word vs mine. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 20 2012 20:08 Bluelightz wrote: if there was a real scum and town this game i wouldnt of got shot. EVER. Basically this. Drazerk wouldn't have checked me night one (I hope he wouldnt anyway) I had a kill on every second night, nightly if VE died. I only had to be one of the final 3. With real scum/town, I was basically the worst lynch candidate day 2. | ||
| ||