He can't be touched right now .. Vote for the guy who most blatantly saves him from the lynch. vote for marvel. That marvel you are town thing ... yes dear I am . is just total horseshit

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 00:03 GMT

#323

Therapist ffs vote for marvellosity type it !

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 00:08 GMT

#325

You are both laughing. Therapist has nothing to do with anything. Everyone take your vote off Kohbee but don't lynch Therapist .. it's useless in every sense of the word.

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 00:11 GMT

#328

You made me let my buddy die. Now I'm pissed

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 11:15 GMT

#336

At least it was fairly interesting. But now we need to discuss the last hour and specially the last 5 minutes before the lynch happened in the context of everyone's behavior throughout the entire game.

On April 02 2012 14:21 omnomMuffins wrote:
Hey guys, sorry I wasn't on, my support staff totally disappeared today so I was running the invitational by myself all day (it was said on stream by the casters for proof). #1

Basically to explain my vote against FourFace was that I really have no patience for dealing with people with bad attitudes and his comment that he was reprimanded for stuck me in a bad way. #2

I see that we lynched a townie, and I will post my conclusions on people tomorrow after I wake up (been working about 20 hours straight), and get a chance to actually digest what is going on

#1 Whatever man

#2 I don't care and nobody asked you to explain anything. Something major happened and you are talking about something totally different and insignificant while having an excuse not to talk about the real issues. I just hate excuses I really do. rtft in chronological order

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 12:57 GMT

#342

7-10 minutes before the lynch my brain worked out this genuinely true piece of information judging by the constellation of the votes:

Kohbee&Solohan50
Kohbee&strongandbig
Kohbee&Therapist

.. can't possibly be THE scumpair. That's all I know for sure. I've got a really long fucking txt. document about Kohbee which I will publish just before night 1 ends to make sure the night actions have been sent via pm to the host.

I'll only quote the beginning of that document now:

"Kohbee, you are obviously the one to investigate right now. Get used to people asking you the same questions multiple times. The best you can do is patiently answer all of them at your best ability without any emotional connotations whatsoever.

Let me just fire up your filter real quick because I remember a lot of senseless stuff that you threw out there for people to take action in your favor. I am curious if what you said makes sense to you at this point."

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:05 GMT

#346

I think you're halfway right about it

On April 02 2012 21:14 marvellosity wrote:
Kohbee, the problem atm is that I'm increasingly thinking that claiming cop was dumb at best, and scummy at worst. Revealing yourself before you've had the chance to do anything just seems so counterproductive.

Plus we don't even know if we have a doc or jailer on our team should we actually even agree you should be protected.

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:14 GMT

#348

On April 02 2012 22:04 Kohbee wrote:

Show nested quote +

I can't be in a scum pair because i am not scum. however solohan, omnomnom and strong should all be looked at very very closely

Show nested quote +

I don't need coaching. I will be ready and willing to answer all questions, however I will not hesitate to call out stupid when i see it.

You can't be serious about this being the way you handle the accusations. I suggest you take your time before posting anything regarding any new post that comes up with you as the protagonist. Stop saying you're not scum, that you're not stupid, that someone else should be investigated. If anyone can save you now it's you and I suggest you do it with logical argumentation and sincere honesty while omitting the parts that cannot be verified because they are irrelevant. You have all that has been said in this game to your disposal. Good luck

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:19 GMT

#349

EBMOP: as improbable as it seems you even have meta

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:41 GMT

#352

On April 02 2012 22:26 Kohbee wrote:

Marvel was high on my scum list, but there is no way a scum player would be the finisher to saving a blue's lynch.

How could he have known that you are blue and not scum trying to say whatever it takes to save his skin and be the laughingstock of the community.

For all you know he was the one to finish the lynch on a town player

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:42 GMT

#354

EBWOP: and not be the laughing .. whatever forget that part.

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:46 GMT

#356

So basically what you're saying is .. you're not scum so he's not scum because he would've known that you're not scum

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:47 GMT

#357

EBWOP: which brings us back to the question: How do we know you're not scum?

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 13:49 GMT

#360

right right .. and you're not going to think about this a little bit more, and come back with a better argument later, are you?

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 14:00 GMT

#363

On April 02 2012 22:56 Kohbee wrote:
nope... just awesome or stupid.

More like herp or derp

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 14:13 GMT

#367

On April 02 2012 23:07 strongandbig wrote:
If Kohbee is scum, then we know for sure that I'm not scum and solohan isn't scum. I pushed the lynch on Kohbee all day

That is 100% true as I said. You&strongandbig impossible scumpair. You could both be town or either one of you could be scum, but not both. It's good that you confirm this

FourFace

701 Posts

April 02 2012 14:30 GMT

#370

"WIFOM is arguably the most misapplied term in the Mafia lexicon, and for years the standard approach to has been to throw out any ambiguous evidence. This is not optimal, as WIFOM situations are generally not purely random. However, WIFOM arises precisely because someone is difficult to read, and the possibility of being wrong is inherent in making a choice.

Many times analyzing night kills is considered WIFOM, as only the killers can say with certainty why someone died. This is especially true when the kill choices were unexpected. At present, NK analysis is considered simply another possibly-reliable piece of evidence, neither useless nor authoritative. "

I could be wrong but by guess it's only WIFOM if you discuss past events.

We are addressing possible developments and once again, predicting possibilities. And once again you are not helping one bit. At least stop quoting that chunk if you plan on saying only a sentence.