Death Factory Mafia 2 - Page 7

On April 03 2012 09:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
What do you think about Wiggles, Bugs?

On April 03 2012 09:54 VisceraEyes wrote:
Same question to you prplhz.

On April 02 2012 09:00 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

No, I don't think someone needs to be confirmed to get the item, but I think that we should see how they post, and get an idea of what their alignment is. There's a difference between judging someone to be town based off their posts, and just blindly trusting them. I think the best indicator of his alignment would be him posting, but he's not doing that, so there's absolutely no reason to think he's town. How he uses the item won't even tell us very much about his alignment either, in my opinion, and that's if he even tells you what it is. It's easy to think of ways to use the items that look pro-town, but don't actually benefit us.

I find it interesting that when I ask a question about why you trust Palmar enough to give him the item, you make gross exaggerations and act incredibly defensive about it. I didn't suggest someone has to be confirmed to be eligible to get the item, and I didn't suggest to flip anyone to try to confirm people, or to waste our PoP's getting the item with someone far up the queue.

Why did you jump to being so irrationally defensive and using exaggerated rhetoric when I asked you a simple question, VE?

@WBG: I'm not exactly sure who I want to kill right now. Based off this last post, and thinking that giving Palmar an item because he asked for it is the most pro-town thing we could do, maybe VE. Or, based on his complete lack of effort, we could flip Palmar.

What do you think of Palmar and VE, WBG? I see you linked a couple people who haven't posted and said you want to kill them, so what do you think of Palmar with his one post?

On April 03 2012 11:50 Snarfs wrote:
I think one thing stands out the most in Wiggles' filter: Aside from the parts you made bold, he's being very diplomatic.


He uses the word 'silly' to push Palmar and risk.nuke... hardly putting pressure on if that's what was intended.


Doesn't outright say what he's thinking here.


Fair enough, need them to post more, but again not really taking a stance.


Again, it just seems kind of... weak. Like he's not trying to actually pressure anyone or find any scum.


Looking at JubJub day 1, he seems a little more aggressive and more willing to call people out for doing dumb things.



To be fair, everything you just said points toward a scumWiggles - scum are going to say things you agree with...if they didn't, they'd be really easy to find every game wouldn't they?

But fair enough, thank you for your thoughts sir. Keep everything you just said in mind tomorrow.



etc.

I wouldn't put him at the top of my scum list though because I've agreed with some of the points he actually has made (ie. there was no reason to assume Palmar was the best person to get the item, people shouldn't necessarily have been tossing claims out) AND I think that some people who have played more games with him will be better judges than I can be of his behaviour.

On April 03 2012 11:50 Snarfs wrote:
I think one thing stands out the most in Wiggles' filter: Aside from the parts you made bold, he's being very diplomatic.


He uses the word 'silly' to push Palmar and risk.nuke... hardly putting pressure on if that's what was intended.


Doesn't outright say what he's thinking here.


Fair enough, need them to post more, but again not really taking a stance.


Again, it just seems kind of... weak. Like he's not trying to actually pressure anyone or find any scum.


Looking at JubJub day 1, he seems a little more aggressive and more willing to call people out for doing dumb things.






etc.

I wouldn't put him at the top of my scum list though because I've agreed with some of the points he actually has made (ie. there was no reason to assume Palmar was the best person to get the item, people shouldn't necessarily have been tossing claims out) AND I think that some people who have played more games with him will be better judges than I can be of his behaviour.