No, I would just rather not wake up at 6am again. There is basically no way town can win and only peculiarities of the setup keep the game going, as far as I know

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 09 2012 09:44 GMT

#1537

He is obviously lying

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 09 2012 15:28 GMT

#1544

I'd appreciate if you decided within the next 4 hours so I know if I have to wake up, for no reason at all, at 6am.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 09 2012 16:06 GMT

#1547

If you don't intend to wake up, you should vote to concede right now

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 09 2012 18:19 GMT

#1551

You have to PM ace, but apparently some people don't care enough about the game to even weigh in on this

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 03:49 GMT

#1581

Just the kind of write up I would expect from Ace, biased from the start and doesn't let go. A role that can, based on pure chance, "confirm" five players is a poorly designed role. Cephiro's case against me was, for the most part, him just tunnelling and even lying based on the dt check. Yes, I was transparent scum, but nevertheless his case wasn't "rock solid" at all. Most of the things he said were not.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 05:45 GMT

#1583

I still don't think it's a good role, but as town I would have concluded it's a real one based on BM's posts. The fact I concentrated completely on his claim and didn't even mention what I thought about his actual posting made it clear that I'm scum.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 11:45 GMT

#1592

While you shouldn't have used your power and should have pushed your reads more, I don't know how anyone thought you were scum

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 14:59 GMT

#1598

It's not very difficult to suspect someone when there is, to you, a red check on him. I still maintain that most of your actually case against me was made up

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 15:07 GMT

#1600

Right, perhaps you should articulate those suspicions then in a way that doesn't involve fiction or things unrelated to alignment

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 15:16 GMT

#1601

And your "confidence" had nothing to do with you getting nullified, but rather the fact that you open claimed your role and intentions

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

April 10 2012 15:38 GMT

#1603

Sorry, I just didn't like the way you were pushing your case, especially because I genuinely disagreed with what you said. I always have doubts about everything, as should everyone.

Prev 1 2 3 4 All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh