EPT# and # for reference.
Newbie Mini Mafia IV - Page 20
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
# and # for reference. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:11 Qatol wrote: Also, FourFace's edits from earlier have been reverted. They should look like they did originally now. Huh. # and # for reference. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 08:51 Janaan wrote: The problem that I have with this is that if SlOosh and Ghost were both scum, I doubt that SlOosh would be the first to call Ghost out. Maybe it's a bit WIFOM to say that, but all it did was bring more scrutiny to Ghost on Day 1, which is something that no scum team would want to inflict to themselves. I do agree with SlOosh's change in posting style, though. It's a pretty big change from his previous two games. I can understand him wanting to be a bit less aggressive this game, but it does seem a bit out of character. I was the first to pressure ghost and then alderaan put some pressure on ghost, if sloosh is scum I think he would've seen the righting on the wall and tried to address the issues ghost had caused by putting a bit of pressure on him, then ghost posts his defence and sloosh just drops his case on him and goes with the other obvious vote of chocolate, suddenly everyones dropped their suspicion of ghost, Sloosh is a clever player, its not impossible that he started the conflict so that he could control it. All I ask is that we all vote for ghost an already suspicious suspect, to get a feel for what Sloosh is up to, I am not accusing him right now I would just like some answers. That said I really don't like chocolates posting right now -_- he strikes me as too aggressive. Am open to voting for him if a ghost lynch is unobtainable. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:03 Chocolate wrote: I would encourage you to vote on steveling, if igabod doesn't post in the next hour I'll change my vote to Steve. Chocolate what the smuch do you think of ghost? | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:21 Chocolate wrote: I had to haul ass to prevent myself from getting banned. I want to be aggressive, I played really passive last game and got lynched for it(I was mafia in that game though). I almost got lynched for it again this game (although this one is also due to inconsistencies). I feel like you're trying to get me to stop posting. Why is that? Do you really think I'm being too aggressive or do you disagree with my choices on who to lynch? I think your in a bad spot, and you need to start offering new possibilities or provide some evidence we haven't heard yet, the case against steven is threadbare at the moment, advocating his lynch makes you sound desperate to get the pressure of you and onto someone who isn't that obvious. Come back with something substantial because this game isn't about just not getting lynched, its about being able to convince town what the right decision is, and right now I see no reason to respect your opinion as much as I would some one else's, so you need to start making some headway for town. Now what do you think of ghost? I'm not going to ask you again -_- | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:19 gumshoe wrote: Chocolate what the smuch do you think of ghost? I agree with some of his views on lurkers, i.e. if we can't find anyone scummy we should lynch them. However, I disagree with If we can't find scum, we should instead lynch people who are not useful to the town. Lurkers fit the second criteria perfectly. because we shouldn't kill them for not being useful, but for possibly being hiding scum.FourFace, I have no idea what game you're playing here. Your rants about insanity are baffling to me even on repeat readings. The only thing worse than scum in a game are townies that waste other peoples time while they are looking for scum. Instead, we have to identify and ignore your madness, which is insanely counter productive. As far as your trap, still don't know what you're going for there. Once the game starts, people have a responsibility to actually be playing. If they can't make it, they tell the GM and he replaces them; not a big deal. My head still hurts. Agree As I said before, I am happy to lynch lurkers... --UNLESS-- ...there are scum. Oh boy, are there scum in this thread. I'm not down with an Igabod lynch (at the moment. Igabod, post more.) simply because there are scummier targets. On February 28 2012 06:37 Chocolate wrote: Right now I'm looking at igabod because he has almost no posts, and because I'm not getting strong reads on anybody else at the moment. I'm looking at some of the people who seemed to be bandwagoning/sheeping on to me, but I do realize that you all want a lynch to gain info, and I may represent the best case to you. Tells us not to jump on the bandwagon. Immediately jumps on the bandwagon. Also, he's posted very little content up til now. His post history is "let's lynch lurkers, let's not lynch lurkers, let's lynch lurkers who don't post in the next hour, let's lynch phagga for lurking, sorry for jumping on the FourFace bandwagon, let's lynch Igabod." Chocolate's Filter And now, his most recent post is "Alderan used an OMGUS sort of, FourFace is fishy, and here's another lurker." Not impressed. Scummy lurker >> regular lurker. ##vote chocolate Just as an aside, did you know that out of the 14 people playing this game, only 4 of them agreed to a no-lynch on day 1? Kinda hypocritical, he "Tells us not to jump on the bandwagon. Immediately jumps on the bandwagon." The bolded part isn't entirely true, voting for someone that early and w/o evidence does not equate to lynching. Also criticizes me for wanting to lynch igabod, but he is happy to lynch lurkers. Dismisses my own cases. If push comes to shove I would vote for him to avoid my own lynch or a no-lynch, but if I had my druthers I would lynch someone else. | ||
|
k2hd
Cayman Islands78 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:30 Chocolate wrote: I agree with some of his views on lurkers, i.e. if we can't find anyone scummy we should lynch them. However, I disagree with because we shouldn't kill them for not being useful, but for possibly being hiding scum. Agree Kinda hypocritical, he "Tells us not to jump on the bandwagon. Immediately jumps on the bandwagon." The bolded part isn't entirely true, voting for someone that early and w/o evidence does not equate to lynching. Also criticizes me for wanting to lynch igabod, but he is happy to lynch lurkers. Dismisses my own cases. If push comes to shove I would vote for him to avoid my own lynch or a no-lynch, but if I had my druthers I would lynch someone else. Thank you very much. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:31 k2hd wrote: Changing vote to igabod for reasons stated in my Previous post. iga's getting modkilled -_- if he pops up before vote then we can lynch him, please consider someone else. | ||
|
Alderan
United States463 Posts
I saved reporting the second post to you guys for obvious reasons, didn't want the scum to see it before it was time. No reason to suspect it's true in all honesty. I don't even know what to think about it. It's getting about that time. Odds are good that either both Steveling and igabod will be replaced, or just Steveling will be replaced as he asked first, and igabod will be modkilled. The question now is, do we want to go for an additional lynch or not? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:36 Alderan wrote: As for FF's edited posts... the first one is actually not exactly what the original post was, but it get's the point across. He said some really weird convoluted stuff that if were true would be grounds for a ban. I saved reporting the second post to you guys for obvious reasons, didn't want the scum to see it before it was time. No reason to suspect it's true in all honesty. I don't even know what to think about it. It's getting about that time. Odds are good that either both Steveling and igabod will be replaced, or just Steveling will be replaced as he asked first, and igabod will be modkilled. The question now is, do we want to go for an additional lynch or not? I do, read my joint case on ghost and sloosh. | ||
|
Alderan
United States463 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:38 gumshoe wrote: I do, read my joint case on ghost and sloosh. Problem is, I initially pushed Ghost as well and came to the same conclusions that Sloosh did, prior to his posting. I had a quote that I was going to wait for him to respond because "I had a hunch", that's what I was referring too, that I didn't actually think Ghost is the scummiest player in the game right now. Currently I find k2hd questionable as well, but I don't have a concrete case and it's too late in the voting period to be discussing a brand new case I feel. Will be a good one fore tomorrow, especially if igabod flips green. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
Gumshoe, I do agree with you about slOosh's attitude this game, it isn't helpful. However, I do genuinely think he took quite the blow with the endgame of SNMM7. His passivity does not condemn him for me yet. I would like him to get more involved, but I'm not going to vote him yet. I do have another suspicion after going through the thread again. However, it is more that this person has tingled my spidey sense, I don't really have a case yet. I will wait until night 1 to bring up those things because I don't have a strong enough case to push him and I don't want us to lose focus. | ||
|
Alderan
United States463 Posts
On February 28 2012 09:45 ghost_403 wrote: @alderan We can't double lynch this game. Majority+1 for lynch. I think you misunderstood. If igabod get's modkilled, and we lynch someone, two people will die this day period. I just realized though that there is a brand new newbie game starting up, which I'm sure the mods will use to get a player to fill in, considering there is only one sub. Because of this, our chance at a mod kill seems minimal to me. I'm torn. | ||
|
Alderan
United States463 Posts
##vote: Steveling | ||
| ||
