|
On February 28 2012 15:23 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 15:14 DoctorHelvetica wrote: after i immediately torn into you for what you said
what strikes me as so odd is you were so sure about you getting lynched, but no one had really pushed a lynch on you yet. no one has been bandwagoning you and even today im the only person voting for you but you talk like you have half the town voting for you no, not after you you said that. It was within the same post. Well yeah because according to you guys I scumslipped. That's something people get lynched for rather fast if people believe it really is a scumslip, so yeah I got like 3 people attacking me within 20 or so minutes (you, Tyrran and wbg?) because of that "scumslip" and you+wbg said we need to lynch me because of that "scumslip". What's the reason you think I'm posting like I've got half the town voting me? EBWOP
|
Lynch RoL. We're trying to lynch the guy for 3 straight up days. Everyone says RoL is a good lynch and that they'd be willing to lynch him yet he survived until now and even now people are talking about something else..
|
On February 29 2012 03:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote: RoL is a bad day 3 lynch because:
1. Not a single person has defended him 2. He isn't posting, the lynch will happen with no pressure and we basically wasted a days discussion 3. I'm the only person who has pointed out what is scummy about his actions anyway and not just complained that he's inactive or a dick
Yes we should lynch RoL, but not today
well he never got lynched so maybe we had a bunch of counterwagons? Like BH and myself?
|
On February 29 2012 03:40 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 03:39 Toadesstern wrote:On February 29 2012 03:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote: RoL is a bad day 3 lynch because:
1. Not a single person has defended him 2. He isn't posting, the lynch will happen with no pressure and we basically wasted a days discussion 3. I'm the only person who has pointed out what is scummy about his actions anyway and not just complained that he's inactive or a dick
Yes we should lynch RoL, but not today well he never got lynched so maybe we had a bunch of counterwagons? Like BH and myself? You have 1 vote
yeah nevertheless people were talking about me for the last 24hours because of that. But your "he never had people defending him" is actually something that is making him look even more scummy. How is a mafia supposed to defend that guy? He hasn't even posted, the only thing they can do is either bus him (assuming RoL is red) OR try to get the focus on someone else while saying RoL is a super nice and dandy lynch but X, Y and Z ARE MUCH BETTER all the time. You can't just defend someone who hasn't posted as mafia telling people "look he's so super pro town" when there's actually nothing in his filter
|
On February 29 2012 03:55 Tyrran wrote: OKay, back from work.
I dont understand people trying to devert the RoL pressure on me. There is no reason lynching me over RoL. I've been apparently useless, and RoL was diverting town from scum hunting. So i'm a better lynch? ONly if you are scum ( hi prplhz and VE).
@DocH : I understand your point about RoL, but you seems to think that he is scum. Why shouldnt we keep a scum alive and risk lynching a townie ? ( although I could go with a VE/Toad/prplhz lynch too, but i'm more confident on RoL for now).
@Kurumi : You say there is no new evidence. He was the second focus of the lynch yesterday, but no one that seems scummy voted for him. The player who pushed the most for his lynch was murdered by scum, and flipped blue. While scum could be playing with us, it seem clear to me that they saw a danger in Syllo, who was pushing for RoL.
I understand there are still more active player that are scum, but i dont really see why we should keep RoL alive. didn't you say I'm your mayor scumread all the time? I recall you voting me yesterday as well or at least "threatening" to do so oO
|
On February 29 2012 04:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Yes I care about who gets lynched you fucking idiot I want it to be Toadesstern or Dirkzor that's such an empty worthless criticism you still don't have anything about my case other than "the guy behaves like half the town is voting him" and yeah I wanted to clear out that "scumslip" misinterpretation as soon as possible because that's stuff that can produce mislynches.
Other than that you've got nothing on me. Even if it were the case I don't post like that as mafia according to VE.
Somthing else that makes you want to lynch me?
|
anyway we need to get some people on one guy unlike wbg said. I don't want mafia to manipulate this thing I'm fine with lynching prpl / wbg / RoL right now.
I disagree with Kurumi when he said we should lynch lurkers to our vigs because that clearly hasn't worked the last 2 days...
|
There is no reason to assume Jackal was shot by a townie. Townies are not afraid to claim a shot 10 secs before the deadline if they're a 1-shot-vig. And everyone keeps saying Jackal would be a bad hit for mafia but I can hardly find better targets than syllo & Jackal. Maybe kita but other than that our vets did a great job doing nothing, making it hard to judge them.
No Vig claim = I believe mafia has 2 KP And why the heck should a town vig shoot Jackal? I shot 3 townies last game but shooting jackal this time? best case he was looking town, worst case he was looking like a null and we had people like prpl, RoL, risk.nuke running around and you guys think a townie would shoot Jackal ?!?!
|
On February 29 2012 05:18 wherebugsgo wrote: Nvm.
So IMO since no townie would hit syllo, assuming this claim is true, it's reasonable to believe mafia have 2 KP.
If you're a townie and you shot syllo, you seriously need to reconsider your play.
Now the question arises of where did that 1 KP on n1 go but that isn't relevant to finding scum ATM.
Let's kill prplhz.
You think hiding redFF's lynch takes 1 KP?
|
oh and if docH tells the truth: That role is complete and utter bullshit for mafia isn't it? Mafia know themselves who shot someone. Either they shot the guy themselves or it was not mafia => it was town (or third party but who cares about that).
Just mentioning.
|
well kita has prpl as his #1 scumread as well, he's my #2 or #3 so I'm okay with lynching him although I'd still like to kill RoL but thats apparently not going to happen.
|
On February 29 2012 05:35 wherebugsgo wrote: Syllo had KP. He's dead.
I dunno if there's adequate reason to assume that anyone else is a vig.
Especially given that everyone wants RoL dead and he's still alive, duh.
|
On February 29 2012 05:46 Dirkzor wrote: Which lynch would provide the most information?
And no this is not a trick question.
If player X flipped scum how many other would you be able to see as scum? it's d3. We don't lynch for information, we lynch to get mafia hanging...
|
hey wbg, don't you have class all around this time? At least you did the last couple of days which was the reason you entered the discussion only like 5 mins before the deadline so far.
|
btw cwave fullfilling risks role 100%
|
On February 29 2012 07:02 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: lol one of the mods told me on skype I had to vote or get modkilled a bit ago, so I whipped out my laptop in class. you know what the funny part about this is?
No one cares
|
On February 29 2012 07:38 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 07:33 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 29 2012 07:24 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:On February 29 2012 07:19 wherebugsgo wrote: And you still have no intention of doing anything, it looks like?
Holy shit, why sign up for games if you're just going to go inactive, make a bunch of excuses, fake a ragequit, then come back again just to go "trolol just shoot me you guys all suck"
You retards shrugged off every attempt at activity I ever made as OMGUS and worthless and were going to lynch me regardless of what I said. When I left the thread, you guys had every intention of killing me, and zero intention of ever listening to me. Why on Earth would I waste my valuable time continuing to fight an uphill battle for no reason when my shits dismissed without even being read? Hint: No one would. Who did you even push? Dr. H? Why the fuck would anyone listen to someone who clearly has no interest in the outcome of the lynch? I don't recall anyone accusing you of OMGUS, now you're just making shit up. Zero intention of listening to you? What the fuck was there to listen to in the first place? Learn to read, at least 3 players accused me of omgus. so what... half the thread is calling the other thread retarded. Be happy it's only omgus
|
On February 29 2012 07:56 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 07:51 Kurumi wrote:On February 29 2012 07:48 VisceraEyes wrote: Kurumi, there are no activity requirements - in order for RoL to have been violating any rules, he would have had to be in danger of being modkilled for activity, which is NOT something that occurred. Stop freaking out about it please. Sorry, I couldn't hear You, I was busy pretending to be afk and then working around rules in a malicious way. While the rules state that voting is mandatory, they also state very clearly that there are no activity requirements. If you want to kill RoL for this, that's fine dude - but don't expect a lightning bolt when it's very clearly stated in the rules that there are no activity requirements. He wasn't in danger of being modkilled, so he wasn't in violation of any rules regarding using his death as a bargaining chip. I don't know what the big deal is - if you feel like he needs to die, then we kill him tomorrow or someone takes care of him tonight maybe.
well he said he wasn't playing anymore implying he wasn't going to vote. Actually he confirmed that implied thing with one of his most recent posts because he had no interest in voting. So technically yes, he was in risk to be modkilled because he never planned on voting.
|
well I don't know if that rule is really meant for that kind of move but yeah I agree. We had a bunch of people saying we should not vote RoL because he's going to be modkilled anyways because he won't show up for the vote.
Anyways I doubt palmar wants us to discuss this here so I'd say pm him instead perhaps?
|
On February 29 2012 06:22 kitaman27 wrote:dunno about bugs, but I just got out of class. I'm interested to see if RoL is going to show up to save himself from modkill. If him and red are town, its a shame they've decided to quit after becoming the center of attention. I'm content with the prpl lynch, sorry if I'm wrong data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
sounds to me like "sry guys, you're going to to lynch a townie again but I feel really sorry about it *happy* :3 :D"
On February 29 2012 07:34 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2012 07:24 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:On February 29 2012 07:19 wherebugsgo wrote: And you still have no intention of doing anything, it looks like?
Holy shit, why sign up for games if you're just going to go inactive, make a bunch of excuses, fake a ragequit, then come back again just to go "trolol just shoot me you guys all suck"
You retards shrugged off every attempt at activity I ever made as OMGUS and worthless and were going to lynch me regardless of what I said. When I left the thread, you guys had every intention of killing me, and zero intention of ever listening to me. Why on Earth would I waste my valuable time continuing to fight an uphill battle for no reason when my shits dismissed without even being read? Hint: No one would. I asked you multiple times to respond to my questioning of your case. Instead of responding, you decided to play the "everyone is against me" card and left the thread. I do find it pretty hilarious how good you are at getting away with this though :p Same as above. Why so happy? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
I don't want to believe kita might be mafia
|
|
|
|