|
On February 23 2012 10:51 chaoser wrote:
sorry, i've been out all day, still at the er but will be back at 9:30 to be able to read. i thought about it and redff is still the best lynch for today unless we're 100% seeing more scummy activity from someone else. if we don't lynch him today, his status will again be at the forefront of town discussion, stifling a lot of our scum hunting abilities since the red dilemma will still be present. i am suspicious of blazing and bc though and i hope to study their case more. in any case, i'm keeping my vote on red today
yo noob deadline was like 4 hours ago.
|
On February 23 2012 11:15 Toadesstern wrote:yo bugs, still arround? Thoughts about what I said here: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 06:22 Toadesstern wrote:On February 23 2012 06:06 Blazinghand wrote:
So the case on BC is
All he's basically done is argue with jackal
He's mad for no reason
he jumped on the redFF wagon
he hasn't been helpful
He's BC, and these things together are uncharismatic of both town play but also BC play in general, town or scum. However we'd be lynching the crap out of him if he were anyone else
Layabout doesn't want to get shot
and this is more convincing than the case against redFF> On February 23 2012 06:11 Blazinghand wrote:Alright lets roll this wagon across the finish line. I'll vote him  I anticipate this will earn me lots of town credit and you guys will be like "wow blazinghand what a fortuitous voteswitch, that makes you a good person" and send me chocolates and stuff but you don't have my address so I won't get any which is really actually good since I'm trying to lose weight On February 23 2012 06:17 Blazinghand wrote:
dude layabout we kind of need another vote and there's like 40 minutes left, get over here Ok those 3 posts worry me A LOT right now. Anyone got the same feeling?
first post is okay, second post is wtf is that and third post is whatever
|
On February 23 2012 11:49 Toadesstern wrote:
do you think I found a townie who is scared as hell and therefore makes no sense to protect himself or do you think I found a mafia that makes no sense because he has to put his vote somewhere?
I basicly interpret his first post as "well guys, I read the cases on BC and THAT'S all you got? Seriously? And you're considering voting BC because of just that?" and goes on to say what he said in his 2nd and 3rd post. That's just so wtf.
from sheerly how bad his play is I'd say he's more likely to be scum.
He's posting less than what I saw him post in purgatory (which is good) but his posts have changed in demeanor enough that I think on meta basis alone I'd call him scum.
|
On February 23 2012 12:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
FUCK Jackal - I'd had myself convinced it was Thursday all day - your appearance in the thread has reminded me that it's not.
X(
Well, while you're here (smashing all my dreams), how about you help me out with something. Can YOU explain what is townie about BC's behavior/defenses that had everyone unwilling to lynch him? I'm not seeing it. All I see are a few angrily and hastily thrown together posts which doesn't really much indicate town to me, although it does indicate null as fuck to me which taken with his behavior the rest of the day seems incriminating enough....
I'm sorry but how does "null as fuck" turn into "scum"?
|
I really doubt this is a no-flip game, that'd be a bastard move IMO.
Palmar's not THAT much of a bastard...right? :p
|
Are you claiming scum right now?
|
I can't actually see any reason for anyone of any alignment to ever say what you just said.
Anyway, need to know basis. I have no vested interest in answering any questions ATM.
|
I find it funny that you're still concerned about my pressure.
Does it bother you that you have no idea what I'm thinking?
|
On February 24 2012 05:45 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 05:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't actually see any reason for anyone of any alignment to ever say what you just said.
Anyway, need to know basis. I have no vested interest in answering any questions ATM.
He's trying to say that he expected a stronger attack from you, and the fact that you backed off surprised him-- WBG is not known for pulling his punches.
I find it funny that you're talking for him.
Are you his scumbuddy by chance?
@syllo same thing I said to Dr. H.
|
I've already answered the question, just not publicly. No reason for me to do that yet.
I imagine you'll have some thoughts prior to the deadline? I'd love to hear about Dr. H, VE, prplhz, RoL and blazinghand.
|
That's a strange attitude to have
|
I wasn't wishy washy regarding redFF, I just changed my mind.
Why so many ants in your pants, Dr. H? It seems like you're boiling over but I've given you no reason to be so nervous.
Worried about the pressure? Certainly seems like it.
|
On February 24 2012 06:02 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 05:49 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 24 2012 05:45 Blazinghand wrote:On February 24 2012 05:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't actually see any reason for anyone of any alignment to ever say what you just said.
Anyway, need to know basis. I have no vested interest in answering any questions ATM.
He's trying to say that he expected a stronger attack from you, and the fact that you backed off surprised him-- WBG is not known for pulling his punches. I find it funny that you're talking for him. Are you his scumbuddy by chance? @syllo same thing I said to Dr. H. I find it funny that you weren't able to understand him. Are you illiterate by chance?
Who says I couldn't understand him?
The two of you seem so bothered by all of this. It's really hilarious.
BH are you scared of me? Is that why you're relying on unsubstantiated assumptions to try and lower my credibility?
|
On February 24 2012 06:09 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 06:05 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 24 2012 06:02 Blazinghand wrote:On February 24 2012 05:49 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 24 2012 05:45 Blazinghand wrote:On February 24 2012 05:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't actually see any reason for anyone of any alignment to ever say what you just said.
Anyway, need to know basis. I have no vested interest in answering any questions ATM.
He's trying to say that he expected a stronger attack from you, and the fact that you backed off surprised him-- WBG is not known for pulling his punches. I find it funny that you're talking for him. Are you his scumbuddy by chance? @syllo same thing I said to Dr. H. I find it funny that you weren't able to understand him. Are you illiterate by chance? Who says I couldn't understand him? The two of you seem so bothered by all of this. It's really hilarious. BH are you scared of me? Is that why you're relying on unsubstantiated assumptions to try and lower my credibility? Man you were like "what do you mean by this" and I'm like "uh its kinda obvious" I don't see the problem here
Guess I was right, I'm not the illiterate one.
On February 24 2012 06:11 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 06:01 wherebugsgo wrote:
I wasn't wishy washy regarding redFF, I just changed my mind.
Why so many ants in your pants, Dr. H? It seems like you're boiling over but I've given you no reason to be so nervous.
Worried about the pressure? Certainly seems like it. Going half the day saying 'Dude he can be this way regardless of his alignment', while true, constitutes being wishy-washy Bugs, whether you decided by lynch time to "change your mind" or not. It doesn't seem like DocH is worried about pressure at all. It seems like you're trying to get him flustered. WAT
Nope, go read the events of the day again.
In particular I couldn't stand the whole "if I get RBed then lynch me" thing because that was basically him just asking to get lynched. Sounded entirely like a bluff to me, and I am not scared at all in calling out bluffs.
also I was one of the earlier people to vote because I couldn't be around at lynch time...so I have no idea what you're talking about.
|
Okay deadline soon and class as well (so even if I'm alive I won't be on till much later.
Midterms  )
My thoughts ATM:
If I die, 100% kill Dr. H. Last time when he was scum I pressured him (albeit harder and during the day, since I actually had time) and then ended up dying. Right now his actions are weird in that certain things he is saying make sense, but other things do not. I'm not very sure on his alignment and many of the things he said recently (particularly what he pointed out about RoL's stance on BC and his agreement with me about VE) make sense. If I'm alive I'll have to strongly reconsider my thoughts on him. Gut says scum, and I can't figure out why.
VE and RoL are both good lynches for today, IMO. I would also support killing prplhz, who has been completely inactive over the last 24 hours and said some incredibly strange things day 1. He seemed to sheep syllo just to sheep syllo, with no real opinions of his own. Sure, it's great to follow syllo's lead if he's town, but not everything syllo says is infallible (and yes, if I die please please please listen to syllogism. If he's scum he won't keep the charade up long since his scum confidence is low but at this point I doubt he actually is scum.)
VE is a good lynch basically because he said BC was null but then he repeatedly called him scum. His actions don't line up with his words and his scum list, as Dr. h said, looks very similar to the bs he was writing in Arkham City.
RoL is a good lynch because he voted redFF but said BC was scummy.
I hope this gets in on time
|
Oh and blazinghand too
He's playing incredibly scummy
|
Alright I'm not gonna be back till later:
##vote VisceraEyes
Points of note:
-said BC was "null" but also somehow scummy enough to vote
-has written fluff posts that are incredibly similar to those from Arkham City
-calls me wishy washy but deliberately avoids calling me scum or even scummy because of it
|
herp herp herp herp herp?
|
one post and you unvote someone?
die scum
##vote Blazinghand
|
VE is scummily annoying but I think BH is more concerning right now.
The fact that BH unvoted BC after one post and has so far done jack shit is indicative that he has no vested interest in actually finding scum. Indeed, in his own post he admits that the case he wrote isn't even his own case. It's like he doesn't want to take heat for pushing BC but wants to be a part of the (now seemingly dead) bandwagon.
Also what's funny is that VE is still saying BC is scum but hasn't voted him yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
