Sleeper Cell Mafia II - Page 46

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:42 GMT

#901

On February 04 2012 10:41 Hesmyrr wrote:
LOL. If you seriously prioritize "scum-tell" over scuminess I'll be sad. Note how GGQ immediately jumped in here with accusation against me the moment he got something to throw against me?

I think you've been scummy too.

This is an overreaction.

vaderseven

United States2556 Posts

February 04 2012 01:42 GMT

#902

On February 04 2012 10:42 redFF wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think you've been scummy too.

This is an overreaction.

Agreed it is.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:43 GMT

#903

Also the previous game there was five scum.
Few people were criticized for bringing up scum numbers and above point was brought up.
I assumed there will be five scums also, so that's what immediately thought when I wrote the current situation.
Nothing more and nothing less, if you can't accept this situation so be it.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:44 GMT

#904

You said it like you knew there were 5 scum though.

What does the previous game have to do with anything. This is a new game with a new setup.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:44 GMT

#905

How is it over-reaction when I have pointed out the legitimately suspicious move? He was not present when I made that accusation post but he appeared immediately when I posted 5-5.

Lanaia

Canada1142 Posts

February 04 2012 01:45 GMT

#906

On February 04 2012 10:34 redFF wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm actually thinking you botched a fakeclaim here up :/

Explain why you checked who you checked.

N1 checked blazinghand because of how he acted day one. I'd thought he was extremely scummy with his whole "we're lynching meapak but OH NO ONE'S VOTING SO I'M VOTING RADFIELD."
N2 I'd just made a case on CWave and wanted to confirm if I was correct.
N3 I wanted to settle the fuss with Jackal. Lots of people seemed to think he was scum, though that may have mostly been you, so I wanted to have an answer.

I'm hoping there's no GF/framers, which is why I asked about mafia PRs.

Day 1
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 29 2012 10:47 Lanaia wrote:
We will not lynch him. Ever. Well, I won't but I will actively fight against it.
had pegged him as scum but things change.

This was in response to Hesmyrr asking me the same question I'd asked: What do you think of blazinghand? This was d2.

On January 29 2012 12:40 Lanaia wrote:
His play near the end of yesterday made him feeo scummy. As for why it changed, doesn't matter at this momeny.

Echoes the reason I even inspected him.

On January 30 2012 09:56 Lanaia wrote:

Show nested quote +

Day 2
I tried to be less obvious day 2, only crumbing when:
+ Show Spoiler +

On February 03 2012 05:57 Lanaia wrote:
Cwave better vote. Really don't want him modkilled.

Which is a terrible crumb, but oh well.

Show nested quote +

These both say the exact same thing.

Day 3
[QUOTE]On February 04 2012 09:25 Lanaia wrote:
Only lynch jackal if you want a mislynch. So don't lynch him.
Jackal, who do you think is scum?

and that's basically it.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:45 GMT

#907

Stop redirecting to GGQ this is your mess.

I saw the scummy post, so did GGQ...

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:48 GMT

#908

I am not redirecting. I explained why I wrote "5-5", and if you think that implies certainty there is not much I can do. Take a look at my posts though and make your decision I guess.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:48 GMT

#909

answer the rest of my questions please up.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:49 GMT

#910

I think it's weird you only managed to hit town with your inspects.

Meh this is annoying.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:49 GMT

#911

Did you ask any other questions besides 5-5 and overreaction one?

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:50 GMT

#912

was talking to naia sorry.

Lanaia

Canada1142 Posts

February 04 2012 01:50 GMT

#913

Seriously? The one time I don't check my preview this game.

And yeah, that was an overreaction on hesmyrr's part.

On February 04 2012 10:37 redFF wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why do you thin igrok chose to tell cops their sanities?

I have no idea. Would I really hit three people who have been framed/are gfs on three consecutive nights, though?

Lanaia

Canada1142 Posts

February 04 2012 01:51 GMT

#914

Also, were there other questions I missed, red?

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:52 GMT

#915

Whatever, I think we can still agree Scamp and GGQ needs to be lynched today.
Also Lanaia, please explain why my post is over-reaction. I did so with my accusation with bumatlarge instead of parroting someone else who posted before you.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:55 GMT

#916

On February 04 2012 10:50 Lanaia wrote:
Seriously? The one time I don't check my preview this game.

And yeah, that was an overreaction on hesmyrr's part.

Show nested quote +

I have no idea. Would I really hit three people who have been framed/are gfs on three consecutive nights, though?

I never suggested you hit frames or gfs.

Honestly telling cops their sanity seems to defeat the purpose of cop sanities no?

Explain why you checked who you checked.

also this

--
Hessmyrr sorry if you pointed this out already but

Hesmyrr please point me to where lanaia or cwave commented on amount of scum.

redFF

United States3910 Posts

February 04 2012 01:55 GMT

#917

On February 04 2012 10:52 Hesmyrr wrote:
Whatever, I think we can still agree Scamp and GGQ needs to be lynched today.

doesn't fly.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:58 GMT

#918

Don't know why you are asking that question when you can iso them and see they did not (also cwave apparently never mentioned 5 scum but 5 words, my mistake). You guys assume my post implied certainty, I am saying I did not.