Look at the voting behaviour last day. Because the situation was lylo (mylo more specifically but who cares) some scum would have been less cautious with the way they wagon. Therefore assure yourself that vote analysis of day 3 is likely to be highly accurate, and let's take a look at what exactly happened. It does not take a genius to figure out Scamp and GGQ is blatant scum.

First, Scamp. He makes a post that he doesn't like Refallen lynch and is suspicious of Jackal. He has made no post which indicates he deviated from his position at the time of his vote. I mean, come on xD This has a lazy scum bandwagon written all over it (the point I brought up on first paragraph becomes really important here).

Then there is GGQ who switches vote to Scamp at the last minute, when anyone can see such action is waste of vote. Actually, trying to push for Scamp is absolutely fine since he is scummy as hell. The problem is that he made no effort to persuade the town of this thereafter. Completely useless behaviour and I already said I suspect it of being attempt to buy town cred or something.

So we lynch Scamp - who had more scummy behaviour - then GGQ next. Looking over the thread I really do not expect anyone will have objection to this plan.
##Vote Scamp

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:02 GMT

#862

I really don't have preference, so I'll go along with the majority as long as it is not anyone else.
Also wtf, is my name really that hard to type out? Hessmyrr all the time with Ace and now Heymyrr D:

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:20 GMT

#874

On February 04 2012 10:17 Lanaia wrote:
How do we feel about roleclaims in this game, everyone?

Mafia wins when they outnumber Town and Town has no killing roles remaining.
Seriously? Also Scamp is good lynch, but that was rather quick change of heart (after redFF spoke up). I'm actually going to look you over again.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:24 GMT

#880

Red, it's 5-5 today.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:27 GMT

#885

The original meta. CWave spoke it, and I think Lanaia did it too when she said she was fearful.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:29 GMT

#887

oh wait, bumatlarge*

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:34 GMT

#892

I said the original meta, which is the previous game. When everyone said the information from previous game was acceptable, I think most thought of 5 instead of 4. Also, the main focus of bumatlarge scum-tell was that he said "Leaning 5". Do not twist words here.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:35 GMT

#893

Breadcrumbs please.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:41 GMT

#899

LOL. If you seriously prioritize "scum-tell" over scuminess I'll be sad. Note how GGQ immediately jumped in here with accusation against me the moment he got something to throw against me?

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:43 GMT

#903

Also the previous game there was five scum.
Few people were criticized for bringing up scum numbers and above point was brought up.
I assumed there will be five scums also, so that's what immediately thought when I wrote the current situation.
Nothing more and nothing less, if you can't accept this situation so be it.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:44 GMT

#905

How is it over-reaction when I have pointed out the legitimately suspicious move? He was not present when I made that accusation post but he appeared immediately when I posted 5-5.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:48 GMT

#908

I am not redirecting. I explained why I wrote "5-5", and if you think that implies certainty there is not much I can do. Take a look at my posts though and make your decision I guess.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:49 GMT

#911

Did you ask any other questions besides 5-5 and overreaction one?

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:52 GMT

#915

Whatever, I think we can still agree Scamp and GGQ needs to be lynched today.
Also Lanaia, please explain why my post is over-reaction. I did so with my accusation with bumatlarge instead of parroting someone else who posted before you.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 01:58 GMT

#918

Don't know why you are asking that question when you can iso them and see they did not (also cwave apparently never mentioned 5 scum but 5 words, my mistake). You guys assume my post implied certainty, I am saying I did not.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 02:00 GMT

#920

On February 04 2012 10:55 redFF wrote:

Show nested quote +

doesn't fly.

Once again, weigh my scum-tell against ISO of these guys and see which one is the better lynch.

Hesmyrr

Canada5776 Posts

February 04 2012 02:06 GMT

#930

Quickly looked over her posts, her behaviour seems consistent and nobody counter-claimed her so I don't know why you are being skeptical. At least, I am sure if Scamp comes up with a counter-claim it will be obvious who is lying.