how about you do something useful layabout. If you're scum, you already know I'm not, and if you're town, you've just reached the correct conclusion.

What do you think about my case against mr. wiggles? Can you explain further why you want to lynch grackaroni (I agree that his play is just... derp, so far, but why do you think so?)

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 13:54 GMT

#477

On January 06 2012 22:35 Jackal58 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Almost all of my day 1 posts attack Palmar. It's a habit. Not necessarily a bad one either.

And do you think that's productive? Are you town? Do you think you're helping town progress right now?

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 13:54 GMT

#478

On January 06 2012 22:53 syllogism wrote:
How would he know that you are not scum even if he is scum?

two families, right.

Anyway, the point stands, he's not being useful.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 14:50 GMT

#481

risk, get in here and explain your plan. It better not be dumb.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 15:14 GMT

#484

if he is carefully reading the thread, how come he falsely accused me of not asking bluelightz who he wanted to lynch? Are you not carefully reading the thread?

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 22:03 GMT

#525

whatever. im moving my vote to eran. someone pointed out pushing me like that day 1 is risky. if i get lynched itll at least be a lesson in why listening to meta that has nothing to do with alignment is dumb as fuck.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 22:52 GMT

#530

i do care, the rate of posting when im around shows that. fact im posting on my phone shows that. only reason im not cool with proving you wrong by dying is there is a chance youre scum, cause youre not this bad as town

@blaz, wiggles made a terrible case, but last 2 times he was scum i got him day 1, so i dont think hed have the balls to do this day 1. erandorr not playing is very good reason to think hes scum.

@town, if i get lynched, check syllogism very well. the fact he hasnt changed his stance after i started posting alot makes him look bad. jackal and wiggles tunneling me is not a scumtell, however jackal is a very good dt check.

will try to post list of reads, cba on phone though, might be able to when im home.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 23:18 GMT

#538

give me an example of you being on the receiving end oh wait you cant

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 23:26 GMT

#540

people on my wagon need to take a long hard look at their play. sheeping activity meta is fucking terrible. when i flip theres no excuse. no "well he played scummy". the only reason youre voting me is youre terrible and cant think. because none of you have anything.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 23:27 GMT

#541

On January 07 2012 08:21 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

Does anyone have a series of links to games Palmar's been town/scum in or do i have to do this manually

my profile or just every game last 8 months

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 23:48 GMT

#548

youre not getting detailed response. im posting on phone and your case was poste 23ish my time or something when im home im going to sleep.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 06 2012 23:59 GMT

#551

oh i thought lynch was in 6 hours in that case ill tell you why youre terrible

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 10:54 GMT

#595

For the people who can't figure it out, I'm moving my vote off mr. wiggles because once I stopped raging over him trolling me with that case, I realized that last 2 times wiggles was scum in a game with me he was quite obvious (mini mafia x, lynched day 1, and cosmic horror mafia, I tried to get him lynched day 1, but he got off with a no-lynch). This game I actually had a town read on him until he derped that case out.

So the conclusion becomes, yes he is just that bad. It would be incredibly ballsy of him to do what he did as scum, thus it's actually more likely that he's just wrong.

That's the reason I've changed my mind.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 10:56 GMT

#596

in addition, out of all the people in the thread, I'm the one who had him as scum day 1 two games, so even if he was to create a phony case, he would probably pick another target. (Jackal's comment of being on the receiving end of me using meta arguments is likely him misremembering me building a pure meta case on him in XLV, however, I was scum that game, so it's an invalid example).

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 10:57 GMT

#597

I have no idea why I put the comment about jackal in brackets.

also, I think jackal is scum.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 11:10 GMT

#599

yes

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 11:17 GMT

#601

yes I think so.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 11:20 GMT

#602

depending on how ridiculous the answer is.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

January 07 2012 13:23 GMT

#608

too many people I think are scum are voting for erandorr, I suppose it could be the two team issue, or even his own team bussing if he has actually given up, but could also be an easy wagon, unvoting him for now. risk and tyrran, and even RoL seem more reasonable choices atm. maybe jackal.