EPTWith 4 town players you can't get a majority of 5.
Resistance I - London Calling - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
With 4 town players you can't get a majority of 5. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:41 kingjames01 wrote: Just wanted to provide an outsider's point of view: In Resistance, one of the most effective ways to gain information is through the voting process. In fact, once the players become more experienced with the game, it is very common to go through multiple leaders each day. I was going to post some guides before the game began, but no one seemed interested enough. I was interested! I even posted links to other forum games of Resistance! D: | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Radfield's accusations of me were all terrible, and the fact that he tunneled me didn't help. I didn't think he had a good reason, and I honestly still don't. It didn't make sense to me that, as a town player, Rad would grab someone who had made a "scumslip" AND be following my pattern BUT not admit it. The fact that he went after me rather than Palmar later on only further convinced me. Also, I don't know why everyone was obsessed with passing the first team that came by day 1, or that it's scummy not to do so. I saw a team that looked suspicious, so I nayed it. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:44 Toadesstern wrote: Well that's it for me. 0:40 am and I'm going to get some sleep now. Good game guys, next time you should try to be a little more active. I can see how judging people (like zona or jackal) is hard when there's so little information. I don't think scum did well, not at all, but we were able to do whatever we wanted to do, given that nothing was happening. I have 14 pages of filter in a 38 page game  | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:46 Palmar wrote: You had no valid reason for calling it suspicious, and it included yourself. Dude I totally did! The fact that I was wrong about radfield doesn't mean it wasn't a weird way he went about things. In fact, he was suspicious enough that Zona thought he was scum. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Obviously if I am unsure I will vote nay. But I thought he was scum. There IS information D1, and that's how Radfield picked me. He read me as town. I read him as scum, and so I tried to "unpick" him by voting nay and passing leadership to the next leader. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:54 Jackal58 wrote: This game is impossible to win as town. Strong disagree. Town only needs to win one of the first 3 missions, and mission 4 is free for them. Even near the end, if we had won N3, we'd also win N4 and have decent odds going into N5. I don't think we lost by a huge amount, honestly, despite the 3-0 score. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:56 kingjames01 wrote: This is wrong too. Down-voting teams IS IN ITSELF a valid reason. You gain information about the other players and who THEY support. I agree with KJ. Ideally, we'd all be super active and everyone would have to propose a team D1 and people would vote, etc, and lots of info would get recorded, then a team would pass and we'd have several pages of votes and evidence to look through. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On January 05 2012 08:59 Palmar wrote: No, you always need a reason to downvote, because if you do it without reason, scum can do the same randomly if they're smart, and suddenly the voting patterns become useless. If you want to use voting patterns, they have to mean something. Randomly downvoting teams for the simple reason of downvoting them actually destroys evidence, instead of providing it. See, this is a fair statement, but on day 1 we didn't have any voting patterns-- the first team passed. If I voted yay, it'd have passed unanimously, and then where would we be? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On December 25 2011 18:52 Blazinghand wrote: Here are some completed game threads I found on mafiascum to get an idea of how this plays out: http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=14194 http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=14193 http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=17111 http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=14946 In case people are looking for reference/research. Did anyone read through these sweet games? Look what happens in say, the second link. Guy proposes the first team and instead of everyone blind yayvoting, there's discussion, and tons of people vote nay, and it establishes a body of evidence, and the game goes on. | ||
| ||
