Responsibility Mafia! - Page 2

On December 23 2011 15:07 L wrote:


RE: Misrepresentation.

Because he likely assumed that mafia would wait for his post because he called it out earlier. This forces any roleblock decision they have to the last minute, literally, of play.

Also, see my other post. The hits don't add up unless people are withholding information regarding their shots. My analysis will change substantially if other people step up and claim they've hit people. Until that point you have a choice between:

1) He lied.
and
2) World's most ridiculous chain of events occurred/Game is broken/He lied about something else.

On December 20 2011 15:05 Chezinu wrote:
I love you bumatlarge...May I join your family? You seem to know your way around this game as if you know what is going on.. Well, you have the men in black at your service. All you have to do is name him.

I think VisceraEyes needs to get off Palmar's back. Right now the town is in a state where I don't think we're likely to catch scum. A lot of people are lurking instead of trying to establish themselves as scum. I think VisceraEyes has a valid point that a lot of the veterans here play like Radfield plays, he likes to sit back and watch the show and then get his reads from unsuspecting scum who think they're doing all fine. We can't all do that though, for obvious reasons.

That being said there's a ton of people on LSB right now so I think he's likely the best lynch. I'll be around until deadline reading up on the thread and then it's back to bed.

but I'll have more time when I get home, maybe someone can point out a couple of people I could look into? Preferably lurkers like GGQ.

What does this even mean? The theme is to punish bad play, not to punish weird play and how do we "think outside the box to counter his methods"? Not making sense is bad play, will you take responsibility?

Is this Curu? Tag your posts. I've a hard time believing that you actually think chezinu couldn't do that regardless of his alignment. Oh no Chezinu may destroy his credibility!!

There is no need to play any differently than you normally do and in fact you shouldn't as that will only make it more difficult to potentially establish your innocence.

I'll be trying a new style so if there's something off with my play, that's probably it

"people accepted the invite despite being too busy to actually play the game as they can't all be mafia. Just look at the length of the replacement queue; I would wager the vast majority of them would be willing to put more effort into the game than the people currently playing."

I'm still partial to GM if that's all he has got. It seems strange that he decided to spend his time writing more setup analysis when we've 6(?) hours until lynch. Lurking by bc/rol/ggq et al seems more of a null tell based on Ver's post, so I'm now less inclined to lynch someone who is clearly completely away.

On December 22 2011 07:56 syllogism wrote:
Anyway, I'm starting to consider LSB the better lynch out of GM/LSB, despite finding WBG's initial case quite stupid. GM's post is a bit strange, but I think him not reading carefully is more of a null or even slightly leaning town read. In a situation where he is already being pressured I think he would be more careful as scum. I do however agree with your points on LSB and even GM's point about him lacking confidence.

##vote LSB

On December 24 2011 12:50 Liquid`Sheth wrote:


I'd really rather you not. I'm sorry for being inactive lately. However I'd understand if you want to, however realize your just hurting town with it.

On December 24 2011 12:50 Liquid`Sheth wrote:


I'd really rather you not. I'm sorry for being inactive lately. However I'd understand if you want to, however realize your just hurting town with it.

On December 24 2011 13:54 Liquid`Sheth wrote:
I didn't say you specifically were. Just that lynching me off in the end would be bad for us. And yes I understand Chaoser, I'm working on it.

On December 24 2011 19:25 syllogism wrote:

This looks exactly like his town play and would be pretty much the last person I would lynch today. I would like to lynch one of the people who have apparently decided not to play the game as by this point it's far more likely that they aren't just busy but rather are using it as a cover. Out of them BC would be my #1 choice.

BC suspects Palmar, but ultimately suspects LSB more and votes him. Still, suspicion of Palmar.

Chezinu: votes Palmar, but isn't viewed seriously (at least by me) because he had no reasoning for his vote. I asked him for one, but he hasn't been around and hasn't provided one.

Bum: same thing as Chezinu.

L: voting Palmar, albeit his vote reason is shit.

There are three things that are troubling me right now:

1. LSB has disappeared and he is drawing votes very easily. This makes me unsure of him being scum.

2. Palmar defends GM on game-irrelevant grounds, but attacks L with the accusation that L is using game-irrelevant reasons to vote him.

3. At least four other people right now suspect Palmar, but he has received no real attention all game. We so far have just been saying "oh he looks like his normal town," which is certainly true, but isn't conclusive of his alignment. With a lack of pressure, if Palmar is scum he could do anything he wants.

Palmar defends GM on game-irrelevant grounds, but attacks L with the accusation that L is using game-irrelevant reasons to vote him.

On January 09 2012 05:26 bumatlarge wrote:
I think he was trying to push the eventual RoL lynch? I mean, they had to get some use out of stopping GM from shooting RoL, so why not push the person in subject? If RoL flipped town, it makes L look right, and if L flips scum it makes RoL look bad. This was why I opted for L over RoL, because RoL flipping doesn't tell us much, and I felt pretty good about L being scum.

Hence, my moral dilemma in thinking RoL could actually be scum :X sorry

I think after the no-lynch and meapak replaced in, town got it's shit together. I think there could have been a few more misses.