Election Mafia

On December 12 2011 13:59 Spaackle wrote:
@nyczbrandon Don't just follow the majority, read the posts and decide for yourself what you want to vote for. It's my first time playing too, but I'm going to make sure that the votes I make are for reasons that I have thought out. Get into the game as much as possible, because it's more fun that way! :D

On December 13 2011 11:26 Radfield wrote:



We are voting for a lynch and mayor/pardoner today, but we still have 24 hours to do it in.

Daytime takes 48 hours
Nighttime takes 24 hours.

So I mafia "Day/Night cycle" actually takes 72 hours.

On December 13 2011 18:35 cascades wrote:
nyczbrandon: Large post count of one liners. Most of it asks for stuff easily found in the topic.

What stood out to me was this:


To avoid giving them excuse of "I don't know what to talk about", topic starters have been given. For example, evantrees at least has made a bit of effort at replying. nyczbrandon has dodged his topic starter and posted something irrelevant. Maybe you would like to state your opinions on who appears townie or mafia nyczbrandon?

On December 14 2011 06:58 MrZentor wrote:


I haven't changed my vote a single time.

On December 14 2011 07:06 MrZentor wrote:


After his post, it seemed less likely that he was mafia, but one post doesn't redeem a man from a day's worth of scumminess. I think that was the only time my suspicions changed, slightly. If you look at the vote thread, you will see my official vote hasn't changed.

On December 15 2011 13:18 bumatlarge wrote:
I'll apply for surgeon general. There is no reason to give this to scum, so we can assure ourselves at least one town medic with me in charge. I think there is some risk here applying for the position, since the secretary is a dangerous role for scumt o get into.

On December 16 2011 08:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Going over the filters, I've coded things by how I perceive them…black for null, red for scummy and green for townie. If I'm mistaken (like, if something is really null that I've called scummy), let me know…workin' on my GAME bro!

MarserBlood
Opening post doesn't say much. Basically says "I don't know who to elect or lynch"
Decides who to elect, not sure who to lynch.
Zeks isolation analysis. Cites that he chose Zeks because he was "one of the suspicious persons," but finds his contributions satisfactory and chooses to vote MrZentor because of "a scummy post" he made, and lack of "obvious scum" to vote. Also states aversion to lynching lurkers for obvious reasons (no info, probably town, etc.)
Here and here he states suspicion that Mafia was behind the removal of Palmogism from the electoral running. Also "congratulates the doc" in dismaying over the loss of a blue. But taken with wanting to talk about something at night, I still get a null read from these posts.
Here I can't tell if he's trying to appear pro-town or trying to maintain a productive atmosphere in town, so again…null.
Soft-defends Radfield from an attack by risk.nuke.

Verdict: Null leaning Town.

nyczbrandon
Notes his inexperience. You only get one freebie guy.
Short response to Spaackle saying he should think for himself.
Uh oh… another appeal to his newbishness… He also comments on Zeks, saying he was suspicious before, but because he called out Sheth for a perceived contradiction….what? He's not suspicious anymore? He doesn't say. But he does say that he'll vote for MrZentor or Sheth. Sheth I assume for the 'contradiction', and Zentor because he "seems to change votes a lot." I don't know, it seems to me like a raw-newbie wouldn't consider indecision as a scum-tell. Possibly help from outside sources? His scum-buddies? I DON'T KNOW BRO!
Here is something interesting. A raw-newbie asking about a modkill for not voting. I mean, okay, it's a valid question from anyone who read the OP…but this seems to indicate that he did NOT read the OP. Curiouser and curiouser.

Verdict: Newb-Scum Lean

On December 16 2011 08:39 GiygaS wrote:


Amazing when you come out of the woodwork as soon as you're accused.

On December 16 2011 08:43 GiygaS wrote:
Risk's Steamship Filter.

In our game, people could describe Risk as:
- Chaotic
- Aggressive
- Accusations without evidence
- Angry/A bit rude (No offense)

In Steamship (Vanilla Townie):
- Very well thought-out posts
- Clear
- Basically all of his accusations have evidence.
- Polite, explains things for people clearly when needed.

Does anyone else see these differences?

On December 16 2011 08:45 VisceraEyes wrote:




Amazing.

On December 16 2011 09:35 Jitsu wrote:


What the hell kind of analysis is this? Your either not trying, or really like lurking.

On December 16 2011 10:28 GiygaS wrote:

Now that you have more time, you can actually post some content with your suspicions. Go ahead, we're waiting with bated breath.

On December 16 2011 09:24 Jitsu wrote:


This caught my eye. He says something along the lines of "day ends in two hours." So, he comes into the game almost right after Arcto is forced out of the election to "Skim Read" over the thread again...I feel that the time he picked (two hours until deadline) and the fact that the 'Election Block' ability of whatever we assume is the mafia equiv. to District Attorney had to have happened within two hours of the day ending.

On December 16 2011 09:52 Refallen wrote:
Jitsu, for the timing issue, look at where I live... I honestly just woke up. And my post timings are always around this timing because it's early morning over here.

On December 16 2011 11:26 GreYMisT wrote:
Alright read through Risk's filter again, I have decided to take my vote off of him as my read on him has been reduced to near null.

In addition to what has been said that he "is attracting too much attention to play scum effectivly" i have found a few other things he has done that scum would not do.




He posts this and then is told right after that the info is in the OP. if he was scum I would find it highly unlikely that that he would not know the way that kp was calculated is publicly availible.

In addition, the way he continuously kept saying that I am scum actually leads me to think he is town, now that i think about it. What would be the purpose of this as scum? to try to start an easy bandwagon against me. however it was obviously not working, as both I and others kept questioning his reasoning. To me a scum player would have stopped after he realized it wasnt working. Risk instead kept pursuing me, and continuously made his opinion known.

I still dont agee with the way he has gone about scumhunting this game, but after rereading i am not as sure as i was on him being scum.

Instead, I would encourage you to read nyczbrandon's filter. Notice the ways in which he says something while really saying nothing, how he hasnt contributed until he was called out for it, and even then didnt really say much or give a stance on anything. He just gave us 4 targets we were already all aware of, and brought nothing new to the table. My vote goes on nyczbrandon for now.

On December 16 2011 11:32 GreYMisT wrote:


yea those

On December 16 2011 11:42 GreYMisT wrote:


This is it right here. From this post it is apparent that you know lurking is the wrong thing to do and that it hurts town. you also indicate that you have a choice in doing so or not. why is it then, that a town player would choose to lurk over being active and helping the town?

On December 16 2011 11:50 Jitsu wrote:
It's funny, because your logic, to me, is terribly flawed. Lynching lurkers *is* bad, because it wastes potential positive scummy players. You want to lurk so you can survive to day 2? Well, it's Day2. So post some analysis.

Maybe evantrees will come to your rescue.

On December 16 2011 11:54 VisceraEyes wrote:
nyc, here's a homework assignment:

Go look through zeks' posts, and as you're reading them, consider "Would scum say this?" and write the answer that comes to your head, and give the reasons why you think that.

Then, when you're done with that, go through Sheth's posts and do the same thing.

Then, when you're done with that, go through risk.nuke's posts and do the same thing.

Then, after you've done all 3 of us, come back and post your findings.

If you post ANYTHING that even RESEMBLES a defense of your lurking again, I'm going to insta-vote you. Stop lurking. Start helping. Or hang by the neck until dead.

On December 21 2011 06:10 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:
CAN YOU PLEASE DO WHAT I TELL YOU TO DO?

Guys! This game is basically over. If someone is on my redlist with a bluerole: CLAIM.
If someone has a similar role as the people on my bolded green-list: CLAIM.

And Vote for me in the election thread and Cascades in the lynchthread!!!

On December 21 2011 06:04 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:
Okay, time for a short summary:

1. Cascades is my scumread number 1 followed by
2. MarserBlood now jaj22
3. nyczbrandon
_____

I think I saw some reasonable town behaviour from every other player in this game.
Especially:

Myself
10. zeks was the first player who pointed out that Curu is scummy because he lied/was lazy. That would be an extremely strange move towards his veteran scumbuddy, if he were in fact scum.
14. GiygaS see Actros filter and his blue role etc. if noone else can perform this he's town
19. Radfield obviously
15. evantrees unlikely that there are two of this kind in the scumteam
3. GreYMisT medic without counterclaim
11. MrZentor dayextenstion role... pretty protown. If noone else can perform this he's likely town
6. TotallyNotTwoPeople attacked curu very early. townfeeling, no real evidence
18. Jitsu town-feeling no real evidence
12. risk.nuke town-feeling no real evidence
22. Liquid`Sheth town-feeling no real evidence

Null:
8. Refallen
5. Comprissent
9. Cwave
these guys just look a little bit better than the three suspects above.

_______

tonights plan:
I get elected as PO, I watch Radfield for sure to save him
Greymist gets elected as Prankster. he's almost confirmed.