EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 89
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:19 Toadesstern wrote: Ok to make this clear. I would LOVE to shoot drazerk or erandorr. To be honest mostly drazerk but I don't think that will prove a thing because the majority is not thinking so as well. I'd say prplhz is the biggest consensus (looked that word up in a dictionary, sounds fancy). I think he's scummy as hell and a lot of people think so as well. SOOO, shot that guy right in his face or die yourself. so you want me to shoot prplhz? | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
if you can, yes. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
 But I guess it's better off that way because If I type in that command it's proves nothing... but I wanted to push a button Are you arroudn wbg? Would be awesome to see if it works, and If I can go to bet with my vote not on annul or if I should change it | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
To be honest, this doesn't convince me at all. It still appears that you were doing EXACTLY what I said you were, namely, looking for reasons to vote and when bandwagons didn't coalesce, looking for reasons to retract your vote. I have been looking for reasons to vote, if you put it that way. Obviously, I haven't been really confident enough to attempt my own analyses yet and so I've been just looking at other people's opinions, checking with my own ideas about what I think about a particular person, and if I find the reasons to be strong enough I'll vote for him. I don't really think that's scummy, though you would be justified in calling me a sheep right now, and I will try to change that. And I don't think I've been 'coalescing on bandwagons and then finding a reason to retract my vote'. It was the Soap incident, and as I pointed out, the meta thing about Soap was entirely new information that was valuable. This doesn't even make sense. You can't blindly look at a dead Townie's suspect list and then say, "AHA! Mafia!" This post is very typical of an inexperienced mafia. Are you hoping that the Town will eliminate players that are suspicious of you? I thought this would have been a good way to make use of the information we got from the killings. Obviously, there's levelling in play here but at that moment, with that new information, I thought that was the best way to make use of it. I don't think this was very mafia-ish at all, and at worst it is the mark of an inexperienced player. I already addressed the doublestack point; come on, that argument is so weak it's not even funny. Why? Cause dead Townies who CANNOT possibly know our alignments were suspicious? Are you perhaps mafia and you wanted them dead BECAUSE they were suspicious of us? You weren't successful hitting annul due to him being saved and you couldn't kill me directly because I had only denounced you and that would have put a lot of heat on you? Mafia trickery. I don't get this point, can you rephrase it? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.writeawriting.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Why-did-Jimi-Hendrix-Write-Wrote-Purple-Haze-.jpg) prplhz the vanilla townie has been killed! He was repeatedly bitch-slapped to death. Day ends in 2 hours and 35 minutes. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:25 Palmar wrote: chance of success: 0.2% yeah think so too, but if those 0,2% happen to be true I'm not going to vote annul. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
annul should be lynched tonight, if I wake up to him non-dead there's gonna be rage. | ||
| ||
