|
On December 05 2011 21:32 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2011 21:23 redFF wrote:
##Unvote
meh palmar you're ok for now
can't get over corrupt saying "so many suspicious people" and then only being able to list 1 and then ignoring my pushing of the issue.
##Vote Corrupt I agree there is something slightly off about Corrupt, but I think that makes him an excellent target for a vig or hatter, NOT an excellent Day 1 lynch. What do you think? + Show Spoiler +I'm not against the pressure though
Why?
It's far more demoralizing for town to mislynch and have a vig shoot correctly. I haven't formed an opinion on Corrupt, but your statement makes absolutely no sense, we should always lynch the number one scum read.
|
Just backing up my homeboy sandroba.
Syllo is certainly capable of playing strong scum if he put his mind to it, but well... he has a terrible scum meta anyway. If he's ever wrong as town we just kill him. Sucks to have a meta of being always right.
|
[big]FOR GLORY[/big
![[image loading]](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4001/4414494166_53023716fd.jpg)
On December 05 2011 13:11 Soap wrote:
I don't get day start, no one did nothing and we have nothing to analyze. I'm rnging.
##Vote Drazerk
##Vote Drazerk
|
FOR GLORY
On December 05 2011 13:11 Soap wrote:
I don't get day start, no one did nothing and we have nothing to analyze. I'm rnging.
##Vote Drazerk
##Vote Drazerk
|
On December 05 2011 23:20 sandroba wrote:
Seriously palmar? How about you tell me what you think about the cases people are pushing. vadersen to be more specific.
Do you have an issue with lynching Drazerk?
|
|
|
On December 05 2011 23:27 sandroba wrote:
Yes, I do. I went to his filter and I can't tell if scum or not. I think the case on vader is stronger.
I am a kite.
I went to v7's filter and I can't tell if he's scum or not, I think the rng on Drazerk is stronger.
|
Cause my homeboy Soap told me so.
Brofield, get in here and tell me what you think about v7.
|
On December 06 2011 01:01 vaderseven wrote:
I take notes on everyone and I don't want to post them. They are shorthand and sloppy and for me. Any time I have a conclusion I post it.
ok
I'm a dayvig.
Post your notes, every single one, unedited in the next 1 hour or I kill you.
|
On December 06 2011 01:04 syllogism wrote:
You quoted your own notes and they didn't look sloppy in terms of presentation
It's cool bro, I got your back.
56 minutes
|
On December 06 2011 01:07 vaderseven wrote:
That's going to be hard Palmer I am at work and they are at home.
Are you srs about the dayvig claim?
Yes.
When will you be home from work?
|
you're boring.
##Vote vaderseven
I think you're bullshitting.
|
On December 06 2011 01:15 vaderseven wrote:
I am a day vig.
No, you're not.
|
don't threaten my homeboy soap.
|
On December 06 2011 01:23 syllogism wrote:
If neither of you is lying, I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption that there aren't two town day vigs. Would you two agree?
Of course, but it's irrelevant, the entire point of claiming a dayvig was to force him to react.
He happened to have an almost reasonable alibi for not posting it, as you probably knew the second I claimed I'm not a dayvig, no reason to keep that up since he can easily write notes at work and mail them back home, and have fake notes ready for posting tonight.
However, I still think he's bullshitting about his notes.
Also, I think he's bullshitting about dayvig, but I'd be fine with him killing Drazerk right now to prove it.
|
Do you stand by your dayvig claim?
|
Ok awesome. Now you have to shoot someone. May I suggest you kill Drazerk?
|
oh wait, even better. since we're gonna hang you anyway, shoot someone, and if you hit scum we'll let you live for the night.
Pick your own target!
It's like a perverted russian roulette with random victims.
|
On December 06 2011 01:45 vaderseven wrote:
I now highly doubt your claim palmar. Do you stand by your claim?
Of course not, didn't I make it obvious.
|
rofl
and that's my homeboy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
