|
On November 18 2011 10:08 Kibibit wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 10:01 GreYMisT wrote:On November 18 2011 09:35 chaoser wrote:On November 18 2011 09:31 GreYMisT wrote:On November 18 2011 09:31 chaoser wrote:On November 18 2011 09:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
You're all going to completely ignore nisani's OMGUS on me? lololol
He's just flailing around at this point. Everyone is OMGUSing everyone else at this point, look at the amount of knee-jerk reaction votes that are being thrown around for no reason. Obviously batman or aragorn needs to come and fix things Or theon Greyjoy Don't you know? Theon's retired with some nice elf babes. At this point people are branching out too much with everyone jerkknee voting people. This multi lynch is starting to become a anti-town mechanic cause no one feels the need to focus and stick with 2 to three lynches. I say starting tomorrow we do a strict people-are-only-allowed-to-vote-for-two-people-a-day rule. That allows for focus and no one will be going around voting on everyone and anyone they fucking want. I agree with this policy. Even though we all have more than 2 votes out at the moment, this would definatly lessen the amount of crap we have to sift through. I'd like to know if the people not voting sinani are doing so because they generally feel he isnt scummy, or they arnt because they dont want another lynch today. I only haven't because I don't have any sort of coherent feelings about him. Not like it matters much, I'm generally confused about day 1 due to the lack of hard evidence besides looking at peoples posts and going "Yep, that's scummy"
the reason I'm personally voting for him I have stated before, its because his arguments are almost non existant, and his rebuttals are always a couple of words designed to either incite anger or not reveal a damn thing. There is no reason for town players to act like this. Thats why I'm voting him.
|
On November 18 2011 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:
So?
We already lynched a lurker today. Leave sinani till tomorrow, he's not playing any different than he normally does as town. When he's scum he lurks so hardcore he doesn't even post.
It's funny you use the "he's not reading the thread" logic to further your case on sinani when you don't do the same with nisani. Matter of convenience, chaoser?
wait what?
|
SCUMTEAM
no lol
but also chaoser is always stupid so its ok
|
stop posting while im typing
|
I seriously suggest people give two more votes to vote sinani off. He's not going to be helpful for town at all in the coming days. I don't see how people can say kenpachi was a good vote and then NOT vote sinani due to "A lurker was already lynched". WBG, Palmer, Cyber, etc. talk about me making a mess in thread (which I didn't) but decide to ignore sinani? what bullshit
|
On November 18 2011 10:08 Kibibit wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 10:01 GreYMisT wrote:On November 18 2011 09:35 chaoser wrote:On November 18 2011 09:31 GreYMisT wrote:On November 18 2011 09:31 chaoser wrote:On November 18 2011 09:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
You're all going to completely ignore nisani's OMGUS on me? lololol
He's just flailing around at this point. Everyone is OMGUSing everyone else at this point, look at the amount of knee-jerk reaction votes that are being thrown around for no reason. Obviously batman or aragorn needs to come and fix things Or theon Greyjoy Don't you know? Theon's retired with some nice elf babes. At this point people are branching out too much with everyone jerkknee voting people. This multi lynch is starting to become a anti-town mechanic cause no one feels the need to focus and stick with 2 to three lynches. I say starting tomorrow we do a strict people-are-only-allowed-to-vote-for-two-people-a-day rule. That allows for focus and no one will be going around voting on everyone and anyone they fucking want. I agree with this policy. Even though we all have more than 2 votes out at the moment, this would definatly lessen the amount of crap we have to sift through. I'd like to know if the people not voting sinani are doing so because they generally feel he isnt scummy, or they arnt because they dont want another lynch today. I only haven't because I don't have any sort of coherent feelings about him. Not like it matters much, I'm generally confused about day 1 due to the lack of hard evidence besides looking at peoples posts and going "Yep, that's scummy"
While it might sound harsh, a lot of the information we get from Day 1 is who is lynched, how they flip, and how the voting went down, and of those the flip is most crucial. If there´s a huge discussion about a player, people defending, soft defending and starting counter-bandwagons, then we can´t really only use that information unless we know the rule of someone involved. It´s often discussed in games where it´s possible to no-lynch how not lynching is just extending the first day with 1 less player, more time to talk but nothing solid to talk about.
There is a point to lynching uncertain targets, if only because Town gets to decide who they want to know the alignment of, instead of waiting for Scum to choose who among the most influential Townies they want to flip.
|
sinani206 (12): chaoser, GreYMisT, Lanaia, DCLXVI, Drazerk, Cyber_Cheese, risk.nuke, LSB, Tyrran, Forumite, Lemonwalrus, Zephirdd
|
On November 18 2011 10:27 chaoser wrote:
I seriously suggest people give two more votes to vote sinani off. He's not going to be helpful for town at all in the coming days. I don't see how people can say kenpachi was a good vote and then NOT vote sinani due to "A lurker was already lynched". WBG, Palmer, Cyber, etc. talk about me making a mess in thread (which I didn't) but decide to ignore sinani? what bullshit
look how the kenpachi vote turned out. do you want that to happen again?
|
theres no such thing as a counter bandwagon in this game.
|
|
|
Kenpachi's vote was a shitty decision, why anyone would vote off kenpachi given his play as well as his potential to help town down the line is ridiculous. You on the other hand have no potential and clearly don't care for the game.
|
On November 18 2011 10:27 sinani206 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 10:27 chaoser wrote:
I seriously suggest people give two more votes to vote sinani off. He's not going to be helpful for town at all in the coming days. I don't see how people can say kenpachi was a good vote and then NOT vote sinani due to "A lurker was already lynched". WBG, Palmer, Cyber, etc. talk about me making a mess in thread (which I didn't) but decide to ignore sinani? what bullshit look how the kenpachi vote turned out. do you want that to happen again?
We don't know kenpachi's aliengment yet, the flip hasn't happened.
|
Unless sinani already knows
|
On November 18 2011 10:28 sinani206 wrote:
theres no such thing as a counter bandwagon in this game.
I know, I wasn´t talking about this game specifically.
|
|
|
On November 18 2011 10:30 chaoser wrote:
Unless sinani already knows
he said he was town why would he lie
|
|
|
On November 18 2011 10:33 sinani206 wrote:he said he was town why would he lie
because his role reveal isnt until the nightpost? because if he were red that means he could cause as much WIFOM and chaos as possible before death by saying he was green?
|
On November 18 2011 10:33 sinani206 wrote:he said he was town why would he lie
If he´s scum then it´s in his interest to keep Town in the dark as long as possible, or risk Town using the knowledge of his alignment to find other scum. Him saying he is Town doesn´t prove anything.
|
ninja'd
23 minutes left. I really wouldn´t mind 2 more votes on sinani206.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
