Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46) - Page 2

Post a Reply

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 20:25 GMT

#931

On November 18 2011 04:58 wherebugsgo wrote:
I think Nisani should probably die at some point. Preferably tomorrow.

why

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 20:28 GMT

#934

WBG you are so wrong... I provided a reason for every single one my votes.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 20:54 GMT

#938

I will post a response when I get home, in a few hours.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 23:29 GMT

#988

OH IS IT HERP DERP TIME? WHY DID NO ONE TELL ME??
---

In other news, here is my defense

+ Show Spoiler +

On November 18 2011 05:28 Nisani201 wrote:
WBG you are so wrong... I provided a reason for every single one my votes.

Okay, I think I understand now.

On November 17 2011 08:55 Nisani201 wrote:
Just read through the thread. A lot of shit is going down.

But most of it is irrelevant. Kenpachi is not irrelevant. He should die.

##Vote: Kenpachi

That's not a reason. "Kenpachi is irrelevant therefore he should die" is not a reason for him being scum.

At that point, Kenpachi was pretty self explanatory. I could have explained more but I didn't think it would be necessary. His insane martyring triggered the vote for me.

On November 17 2011 10:02 Nisani201 wrote:
Palmar needs to get lynched. His case against chaoser is stupid, and he has barely been doing anything throughout this game. His vote on Lanaia is also scummy.

##Vote: Palmar

That sounds like a reason, but actually it's just bull. Completely unsubstantiated.
Nope, it makes complete sense.

On November 17 2011 02:16 Nisani201 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Both of them are bullshit. First we have this case against LSB, which I already mentioned:

Show nested quote +

On November 15 2011 20:44 Forumite wrote:
/confirm

On November 15 2011 16:12 LSB wrote:

On November 15 2011 15:49 DCLXVI wrote:
damn I forgot people post while I'm in the middle of writing posts... ugh

On November 15 2011 14:55 LSB wrote:

On November 15 2011 14:19 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:

On November 15 2011 12:55 LSB wrote:
come to think about it, that does seem like a nice icebreaker. So everyone! How about lets talk about how you think mafia should be played, the importance of blues, what should we do with lurkers, and what majority lynch means.

LAL?
For your point on LAL, unless I have misread the OP, we only know what abilities are possible, not which are actually in the game, how they may have been combined into roles, nor how many of the role there may be. So, unless we have a cop of some variety, I don't know how you intend to find liars in this game. So were you just stating that as a general "in mafia games" rule, or did you have something in mind for this game in particular? I'd be interested in hearing how you intend to determine the liars given the setup.

Lying will come up and you will be able to recognize it. The most prominent example is fake claims. So LAL means no fake claims. + Show Spoiler +

Or it means don't get caught lying.

+ Show Spoiler +

Kenpachi's green claim would be an example of a potentially acceptable lie (if he is blue) as this early in the game any claims are meaningless

So what is your position on Kenpachi claiming townie? At first you say LAL, but then lying can be acceptable in certain situations, such as kenpachi is blue. Then you say that his claim is meaningless as it is too early in the game. Does that make his post spam/intentionally distracting? Surely he is a good enough player to realize the importance of his claim. Can you explain your opinions on the subject rather than just post vague generalizations. Is kenpachi's claim worth analyzing/what does it mean?

Wtf does this mean? Are you saying you are taking Kenpachi seriously?
Stop talking hypotheticals, iirc you've played with Kenpachi before. Even if you have not you can go through his posts and figure out how he plays. In addition you've played before so you know how TL mafia is in the first few hours. I honestly don't see how

I´m going to step in here. DCLXVI allready caught this and posted before me, but I don´t think my reason for noticing has been discussed. Okay, to me it looks like this; LSB wants us to Lynch All Liars. Kenpachi claimed Townie, but LSB doesn´t want us to take the Kenpachi claim seriously. My problem here is that either Kenpachi lied, or he just told Scum not to nightkill him, because it would be no use. If we are going to go by the LAL policy, then either Kenpachi lied or acted Pro-Scum, so why should we back off? Kenpachi does this every game, then we can ignore his claim, but what I don´t agree with is LSB promoting LAL wanting to ignore the claim, even if it is meta. It took him about 5 posts to go back on his own policy of Lynch All Liars. If Kenpachi lied (or play Pro-Scum), why does LSB then defend him after his first policy post?

FoS LSB

As for lynching 1-2 lurkers and 1-2 scum, sounds reasonable, I think we should stay at about that number for now. We need to be carefull about lynching, not just because of the consequences in the setup, but if we find 5 players who seem connected, then it´s better to lynch 1-2 and see if they are scum, than lynching all 5 at once and kill 5 innocent townies at once.

And then we have this:

Show nested quote +

He is pressuring them based on bullshit cases.

------------

In regards to chaoser, I don't think that Palmar's analysis has enough evidence to prove him guilty. Just because it's Palmar doesn't mean that we can't look at his analysees objectively.

When Palmar asked you "what case is bullshit" you just picked the two and said they're bullshit.

You didn't say why. You didn't point out anything that seemed fabricated. You just said they're bullshit. Real convincing, dude.

That's because I explained it earlier in the thread here.

On November 18 2011 01:58 Nisani201 wrote:
I just read through Drazerk's filter. He has been jumping on bandwagons and supporting bad lynches this whole game.

Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him?

##Vote: Drazerk

This one makes you a hypocrite, since you also voted Kenpachi.

But I'm not supporting bad lynches.

The problem is that both you and Drazerk look terrible, and neither of you has amazing town play. Drazerk is straight up bad as town (no offense, Drazerk you defended yourself by saying that lol).

I'd rather vote you over Drazerk right now since you seem to be soft-defending chaoser at every turn, and I don't like chaoser right now.

So, you need to die.

##unvote Drazerk
##vote Nisani201

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 23:30 GMT

#990

On November 18 2011 08:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
Drazerk will make a better lynch tomorrow, once we see these flips.

Today, chaoser, nisani, and bum need to die. If any of those flip town then we need to heavily reconsider Drazerk+Coag.

Why is Coagulation suspicious again?

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 23:31 GMT

#993

##Vote: Drazerk
##Unvote: Nisani201

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 23:38 GMT

#998

On November 18 2011 08:32 wherebugsgo wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm not going to bother answering you anymore, since it's clear you're not reading the thread.

Consider yourself ignored.

You do this a lot.

Especially when you're scum

##Vote: wherebugsgo

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 17 2011 23:44 GMT

#1000

On November 18 2011 08:42 Drazerk wrote:
Stop being an idiot and read the thread

##Vote: Nisani201

What makes you think I'm not reading the thread?

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 00:18 GMT

#1006

On November 18 2011 09:12 GreYMisT wrote:

Show nested quote +

You really arn't ever going to provide significant reasoning for voting are you? even when that is the major case against you, you decide just to do it anyway.

##Vote: Nisani201

Denying information like that is anti-town. He's done it to me before as scum.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 00:22 GMT

#1008

The people who I want dead have votes on them from me. Sinani has been showing some of his opinions and isn't lurking anymore. He hasn't done anything scummy yet so I don't see a reason to lynch him

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 01:57 GMT

#1079

On November 18 2011 10:47 bumatlarge wrote:
I'll look into sinani, he seems to post unsurprisingly similar to nisani

This is untrue. I'd vote you, but I guess some people are right in that I am voting too many people.

Maybe tomorrow I will push for your lynch.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 02:01 GMT

#1085

On November 18 2011 10:58 chaoser wrote:

Show nested quote +

Are you willing to vote sinani nisani? Given how your "too many votes" right now means nothing since it's 2 more minutes till the end of day

Well I guess it doesn't matter anymore, since hyshes voted him.

But I don't think he'll flip scum.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 02:11 GMT

#1096

HERPIN TO THE DERP BEAT, THAT'S HOW WE ROLL IN THIS MOTHAFUCKA

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 02:15 GMT

#1102

DCLXVI
Drazerk
Zephirdd
GreYMisT
risk.nuke
Tyrran
Lemonwalrus
Cyber_Cheese

These people voted for both Kenpachi and sinani206.

There is 1-2 scum on this list. Drazerk is one of them

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 02:18 GMT

#1105

On November 18 2011 11:18 prplhz wrote:

Show nested quote +

.... no.

Did you read what Kenpachi flipped?

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

November 18 2011 02:27 GMT

#1107

Drazerk voted Kenpachi early on when there was no reason to. He was also the first to start the Lanaia bandwagon.

The vote on Sinani206 had no reasoning at all.

scumlol