EPT
I shall never forget this slight against my honor.
Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46) - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I shall never forget this slight against my honor. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 13 2011 09:57 Forumite wrote: My name is Forumite, you hammered my father Day 1, prepare to get lynched! Inconceivable...... | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 13 2011 10:18 Forumite wrote: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. You were supposed to be this colossus! you were this extraordinary thing, and yet he gains... | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 13 2011 10:13 Kibibit wrote: I'm a noob to this stuff, what's a QT? (for reference, my first game of mafia ever was at IPL) QT stands for QuickTopic, its a message board that the mafia team, as well as observers and dead players, use to communicate | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 04:15 Forumite wrote: In about 5 hours I´m going offline to enter a rejuvenating coma, but will be online later during the next local light-cycle. Not a day goes by that I Don't wish people really talked like this. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 05:23 kitaman27 wrote: lol I used to get those all the time while taking naps after classes. At least Hot_Bid has never infultrated my dreams. Maybe he incepted you! | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 12:09 Zephirdd wrote: Oh we're sailing already. Oh well, hope we find these hijackers. (amidoinitrite? We RP with it or can we talk normaly? lol!) GLHF GG So you are GMarshal's smurf after all! /confirm btw. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I think i saw this earlier but i would like to bring it up again here, With the multi-lynch mechanic what do people think about lynching an additional lurker for the first few days? usally the problem with the day1 lurker lynch is town doesnt scum-hunt when they are determined just to kill a lurker. however with this settup we can "tack on" another target to the lynch. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 16:50 xsksc wrote: 1) I'm assuming this means focusing solely on getting 1 person lynched? If it does, we obviously want to avoid that and keep an open mind. 2) I think the multi-lynch system looks really interesting, and could be a great help if we use it properly. If we have a couple of people who are posting suspiciously then we don't have to decide which one is scummier, because we're not limited to one lynch, we can judge them seperately and lynch them both (if it comes to that). 3) We shouldn't go overboard with the use of this on lurkers, maybe lynch 1 lurker a day with it, in addition to the people we think are scum. Tunneling refers more to putting intense pressure on a single player, with the hope that they slip up in some way if they are mafia. When done well it can be quite good. but too often it only serves to sidetrack the town, and makes people think you are scum because of that. Cyber with regards to your 2nd point, as i think i answered both 1 and 3, this whole multi lynch concept is a risk, I think its up to the town to decide whether or not its something we should all go for on a day by day basis. but initially each day i feel like we should approach the game like its only majority lynch rules. Similar to WAW2 with the nukes (until it devolved into madness). | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 16:59 LSB wrote: What are your views about this? Should we do this? If so why? Is this directed at me? | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 15 2011 17:16 LSB wrote: Not necessarily, I want xsksc to answer his question. But it's been brought up multiple times, and maybe we should hold a 'poll' on it. + Show Spoiler + The issue with discussing plans is that unless it is clearly town favored or mafia favored it is really easy for mafia to lurk and discuss a plan (something they probably don't care about) instead of making fake analysis fortunatly, with a 72 hour first day, we should be able to get enough info to get a reasonable lynch (or more reasonable than most day1 lynches), or identify the hardcore lurkers | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 16 2011 01:22 Nisani201 wrote: FURTHERMORE, claiming town is not pro-scum, because it is in everyone's best interest to appear as a vanilla towie. Townies want to look green because they are green. Blues want to look green so that they are not a Mafia target. And Mafia wants to look green (most of the time) because they don't want to get lynched. and On November 16 2011 01:22 Nisani201 wrote: Sometimes Mafia has to fakeclaim a blue role as a last resort to escape a lynch. To me this seems really odd. Care to elaborate on your reasons for posting these? | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
I think the time for troll voting is over... From the OP: You may include multiple votes and unvotes in the same post. However, do refrain from both voting and unvoting the same person in a single post. It is possible that some role abilities are tied to the votes that are cast, so be mindful as to how you exercise your vote. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Oh, well then care to provide reasons? I'm afraid i dont speak LAL code. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
So it works in games other than LotR mafia as well... | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On November 15 2011 15:12 DCLXVI wrote: Is it worth speculating what dangers there are in roleclaiming/lynching multiple people in a day? Both are warned against in the OP, but at some point (not now) I can see either becoming a legitimate strategy. Unless we set a low bar for lurkers, I think that many players will qualify as lurkers and so far the general consensus is to lynch them all. I don't think we want to run the risk of "hazards in store for the town that lynches too many players in a particular day" while we don't need to. Instead of setting a certain number of posts/quality to pass/fail, we can determine the 1-2 least helpful/scummiest players and agree to vote them. I don't see any merit in roleclaiming now, or even townie-claiming. If kenpachi and hiroruby would explain why they did so I would be ever so grateful. Personally I will not claim for now, but that is open to change. Both the warning in the OP and the lack of activity so far makes me hesitant to do so. But in your next post you vote for two people, both kenpachi and kbibit. + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2011 04:14 DCLXVI wrote: did did you just not read the thread then? That option was brought up several times. @LSB I didn't know that kenpachi always townie claims day 1, it has been forever since I have played. It still does not allow him to post 2 other useless one liners and then leave. I just don't think that you should just write off kenpachi so quickly. Zephirrd confirmed early then came back later and actually posted stuff. Once I look that over and see if it is good material I can comment more on it, but at least he posted something. Kenpachi posted useless one liners in response to hiroruby (so there was stuff to talk about, he just decided not to) and then disappeared. I want to see more out out of Kenpachi than this. If he has played enough games for this behavior to be standard, then he should know that this doesn't help the town. ##Vote Kenpachi and now for a new topic: first post is fine, counts for nothing what does this mean, you want to lynch inactive people - really? How many, how inactive, why do so? I won't accept you just "more or less agreeing" with people. That is not helpful and super scummy imo. Now after some time has passed and more topics are brought up to discuss: Once again a wishy washy agreement with the general consensus, but not actually taking a side. This is also allowing mafia get away with lying if we used it. Once again you think that it is ok for townies to lie badly, we should cut them some slack? Why are you trying to allow scum to get away with occasional inconsistencies/small lies? All Kibibit has done is to sort of agree with everyone, make excuses for potential liars, and lurk (after he says we should probably lynch lurkers.) ##Vote Kibibit How is this not a contradiction? | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 16 2011 10:40 chaoser wrote: I didn't fabricate analysis though. Forumite built a shitty case on LSB out of nothing. The difference between him and I is that I didn't try to hide my case behind long paragraphs and shitty reasoning. I just went "lawl scum *vote*" But back onto the topic of pressuring: In XXXIX redtooth makes a bullshit case on Irish_Punk with no real reason and I followed up on his vote. There is no "leading the whole thread" in that game at all because the natural reaction to a bullshit vote is to go "wtf?", especially when clearly there was no real case in the first place. Who is going to be lead along by "lawl scum, *vote*" as the only reason for voting someone? No one, as was true in that game (people ended up voting Kurumi off 6 votes compared to the 2 on Irish) Anyway, due to the random no reasoning pressure, Irish overreacts and responds in a crazy manner. This then created discussion; At my expense though =[. More importantly, because of how he responded to the situation and how the rest of the players responded to his response of the situation, I was able to get a solid read on about half the thread and ended up pinning two other players as being mafia. My day two read/suspicious/vote was on amber was completely based around the fact that he was very flaky between voting Kurumi and being suspicious of Irish. Then I directed a vigi shot at GGQ due to how he handled the Amber lynch. Thats the problem though, because with your first vote you didnt fabricate analysis, because you didn't make any analysis until I prompted you. And This is directed at a lot of people, but whats up with reciting the history of a bunch of past games? I mean unless you are using it for meta analysis it servers only to act as filler really. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
| ||
