|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 04:57 GreYMisT wrote:
they are just withholding their opinions causing chaos, or they are scum laughing at us
Cmon now. Really? You can't come up with any reason why we might not share who we are lynching today? You act as if we will never decide or something. Please unvote and we will share who will be lynched later in the cycle. At the moment, your team is the one causing chaos by voting for a player that the town hasn't come to a consensus about lynching. That is selfish.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:05 supersoft wrote:
its not selfish, its a risk. if kuru is town, scum has to hammer.
and if scum does hammer we lose. I'm not sure I'm understanding your logic.
Why don't you want a bugs vs you lynch? Please unvote.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:08 supersoft wrote:
i dont. i am 100% sure of wbg. obviously i cannot convince you..
Wait what? Why not?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:12 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2011 05:08 kitaman27 wrote:On November 10 2011 05:08 supersoft wrote:
i dont. i am 100% sure of wbg. obviously i cannot convince you.. Wait what? Why not? you accused me at the beginning of the day with no reason. i know i cant rely on your judgement.
There is a difference from ones intentions and the opinion one is trying to portray in the thread. We're looking for connections and attempting to bait reactions. There are two LYLO, not just one. Do you not agree that more information benefits town? Please unvote.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:21 supersoft wrote:
no. i got two scum catched there. wbg 100% and if kurumi doesnt die, we got the other one. it's an all in.
scum has to hammer.
Why do you get to make the decision yourself? If kurumi does die, then the game is over.
Why won't you let us discuss it first?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:25 supersoft wrote:
what how can we have a 100% lynch???
explain that to me!!! YOU DONT TALK TO ME!!!!
i wanna know your 100% plan or ill do that myself.
We're going to vote bugs in 24 hours. Don't make us beg. Unvote gogo.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 05:28 supersoft wrote:
from my pov i see a 50/50 lynch between me and wbg with your plan
You do realize that there has to be a lynch between you and bugs before the game is over....right?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
supersoft. Here is where we were at. We were deadset on lynching bugs and radfield at the beginning of the day. We would feel more comfortable about the GM/kurumi lynch if we had more information. You going around by yourself and voting isn't helping things. Don't change our mind. Unvote, stop threatining town, and lets be reasonable.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
*A wild wherebugsgo has appeared!
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 06:14 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2011 06:13 GreYMisT wrote:On November 10 2011 06:11 redFF wrote:
great since everyone is here. gm, chez or s&g? The Vote is going to ultimately come down to you team red21 Barring any sudden changes in opinion this is what we have thus far: me and WBG are going to vote against each other, Kurumi has already said he thinks I'm scum, and GM said that he thinks WBG is scum. Thats 2v2, leaving you as the tiebreaker. I'm going to vote for the opposite of whatever kurumi's team votes, because I know them to be scum.
err, that logic doesn't work.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 06:16 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2011 06:15 kitaman27 wrote:On November 10 2011 06:14 GMarshal wrote:On November 10 2011 06:13 GreYMisT wrote:On November 10 2011 06:11 redFF wrote:
great since everyone is here. gm, chez or s&g? The Vote is going to ultimately come down to you team red21 Barring any sudden changes in opinion this is what we have thus far: me and WBG are going to vote against each other, Kurumi has already said he thinks I'm scum, and GM said that he thinks WBG is scum. Thats 2v2, leaving you as the tiebreaker. I'm going to vote for the opposite of whatever kurumi's team votes, because I know them to be scum. err, that logic doesn't work. how so?
Kurumi being scum does not imply kurumi voting for scum.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 06:43 GMarshal wrote:
I'm just going to collapse into bed now.
Playing mafia when words are dancing on your screen is a lot harder than it sounds.
If you were the real doctor then you wouldn't have this problem now would you?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 06:54 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2011 06:52 redFF wrote:
also supersoft i know you're gonna waltz into the thread and tell us how amazing you are that you found the scum but honestly that was the worst town play i've ever seen and i've seen some pretty bad stuff. I think I get the award for that. I really thought it might win us the game at the time. Lesson learned, when you are practically hallucinating, your "brilliant plan" is probably not so brilliant. It *could* have worked though!
If it makes you feel better GM, this is what I posted in our quicktopic. It was exactly the response we were looking for.
I'm going to post in the thread suggesting that the medic should role claim. If this is a setup with a medic, then hopefully they will have enough sense to keep hidden and just trick mafia into hitting us. If this is a setup without a medic, then perhaps there will be a team that will be willing to fake claim medic and draw a hit allowing us to pull off the check.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 06:53 wherebugsgo wrote:
this was an uphill battle all game. We were punished for the fact that the PC appeared scummy.
We were considering claiming even before we got in trouble. Like we mentioned before, there is about a 10% chance of living to day 3 without a protection, so we felt the 66% chance of there being a medic/jailer would increase our chances. I do imagine it must have been frusturating with a partner that hasn't posted in the thread. I think he could have gotten away with it for the first two days, but blatently ignoring the thread when he is obviously posting elsewhere after multiple promises was essentially suicide. If it makes you feel better, we were leaning Chezinu/Nipple before receiving our check result.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Thanks for hosting Palmar and ON!
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I think super/grey did a real good job of establishing themeslves as town from the start. If they hadn't, the decision would have been much tougher. The main reason we checked Rad/bugs night 1 was because of Radfield's attempt to sway our check to a team we thought we were capable of lynching day 2.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 07:12 Kurumi wrote:
Well, I think this will be again last game in a while because I am tired of being called useless.
You did a pretty good job dodging the day one and day two lynches. If it weren't for RoL, I think you had a chance going up against GM.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 07:16 wherebugsgo wrote:
I couldn't bus Kurumi when he and RoL both came in at extremely odd times to soft defend us.
I even repeatedly sent Kurumi PMs telling him what I wanted him to do and every single time I'd look in the thread and there'd be this random single post that would make me and Radfield look like shit.
And I disagree with you completely on the day 3 business. I really don't think I got lynched on day 3 for any fault of my own. That lynch literally could've swung either way, and all the facts were on my side.
I know for a fact I would've hated to be in GM's or super's shoes as town. We were in a good spot. Town just flipped a coin and it landed correctly.
Also follow the cop IS an issue with the parity. All they need to do is check people who don't die and they have more than enough information on day 3. We couldn't do anything about a day 1 claim. That isn't our fault at all.
It did take guts to doubt our PC claim when you knew it had to be true. I liked that, although asking for our checks was kind of weird. It was interesting to see how much confidence you had with every lynch, knowing that they were all wrong lol. It would have been interesting to see how this game played out with a PC/jailer instead.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On November 10 2011 08:23 Ace wrote:
I told WBG I didn't read the game but skimmed the thread and saw when GM said he fake claimed to protect the medic.
There should have been an instant lynch right there with no hesitation. But the Town is ridiculous.
That wasn't the situation. He didn't fake claim to protect the medic. He fake claimed to protect the parity cop.
It was night two after two mislynches and a claimed PC with no knowledge if there is a medic in the setup. Best case scenario, the scum team get spooked and doesn't shoot the PC. Worse case scenario, the scum shoot the PC anyways and you chalk up the GM fake claim to a null tell.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
That's not what he meant though. At the time of the claim, he couldn't have known if there was a medic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
