Lord of the Rings Mafia - Page 34

On September 19 2011 08:48 kitaman27 wrote:


Wait, what? Is there a scum politician or something? He never posted to change his vote.

On September 19 2011 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
Can someone summarize why Erandor became the lynch?

I've read most of the posts that were made while I was gone and it's not really making sense to me.

On September 19 2011 04:48 Radfield wrote:
Errandor is a fantastic Day 1 vote. Lets break down what we're looking for:

1. Low-Mid range activity
2. Vote Contradictions
3. Paragraphy vote posts with BS reasoning
4. 'Contribution' posts that say nothing

+ Show Spoiler +

First post details that WBG is probably just trolling, and while stupid, isn't really worth much attention. Frankly I agree, but whoops with his second real post Errandor is now willing to vote out WBG:



We've gone from WBG trolling to now being worthy of getting lynched day 1. This is the most BS post in the thread right now. First we have the contradiction. Second we have the justification that even if he is town, he's worth getting rid of. NOPE. I realize that's not precisely what's been written, but that is absolutely the intent. Third, this is a complete and utter bandwagon. WBG picks up a couple votes, and Erandorr slides into the scene. Fourth you add in a bit of extra post restriction business which does nothing but cut him down. This is not why we vote! This entire post is showing that Errandor justification for voting WBG is not in fact that he's scum, but rather a bad townie who deserves to die.

An hour and a half later, Errandor posts this:

"Okay I read the whole thread now."

Whoops scum slip. Why are you voting for a player AND THEN reading the thread? Not how townies play.

This is all followed by a bunch more suspicion on WBG, but no actual points against him:

+ Show Spoiler +



To paraphrase: "You're actually playing good now, but you trolled before. You're targets are all good, but your behaviour is bad"

It's hard to justify killing townies when you're scum isn't it?

Errandor is very scummy, and likely the best vote we'll get:

##Vote: Erandorr

On September 19 2011 09:04 wherebugsgo wrote:
Did he get lynched solely because of the edit?

On September 19 2011 09:05 jcarlsoniv wrote:


That was sort of the last nail in the coffin. If there were any people on the fence before that, the edit pushed them over the edge. But the bandwagon started before the edit.

On September 19 2011 09:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
I think the case on Jackal is still pretty strong. We should consider lynching him tomorrow.

Other people who stand out to me are Drazerk and Dr. H.

Palmar still needs to post more, I think I saw a couple by him but he doesn't normally lurk this much.

Sandroba will hopefully have internet tomorrow and will be able to weigh in on all of this. It's not a very good idea to lynch either of them unless they begin showing signs of harboring a scum agenda.

On September 19 2011 09:52 Jackal58 wrote:

What case? Oh the one where I thought lynching a 3rd party suspect was better than a mislynch? Or the one where I'm supposed to be some sort of mafia messiah and I haven't delivered you to the promised land yet?

Mig convinced me to stay btw. <3

On September 19 2011 09:57 wherebugsgo wrote:


The one that involves you telling people to give me the ring day 1 (when it's outlined in the OP that the ring may only pass hands at night) and also to lynch me at the same time, coupled with the fact that there were likely multiple scum on my wagon, meaning if I were to receive the ring (and not die) and then be lynched the ring would be sent to one of my voters. AKA scum.

That case.

On September 19 2011 09:57 wherebugsgo wrote:


The one that involves you telling people to give me the ring day 1 (when it's outlined in the OP that the ring may only pass hands at night) and also to lynch me at the same time, coupled with the fact that there were likely multiple scum on my wagon, meaning if I were to receive the ring (and not die) and then be lynched the ring would be sent to one of my voters. AKA scum.

That case.

On September 19 2011 10:11 DoctorHelvetica wrote:


I don't understand. Are you saying scum voted for you because they thought someone would give you the ring so they could get the ring when you got lynched and thats why me and drazerk voted for you

On September 19 2011 10:06 TranceStorm wrote:

I would like to know why you said that as well Jackal. Did you not read the OP or something?

On September 19 2011 08:45 iGrok wrote:
Ok, lets review. Who of the following are the scummiest?

Palmar - Not doing much so far
Radfield - Has been active. Pulled wagons off GreyMist and WBG, onto Errandor. Suspicious.
Syllogism - Was active early on in Ring discussions.
prplhz - Leaving this until later
kitaman27 - No great analysis, but decent reasons for voting and has worked to pressure
OriginalName - After watching him play in Resurrection, he's playing the same way. Minimum contribution to avoid focus.
Vain - 1 liners except to defend prplhz
Erandorr - somehow appeared on his own vote list?
TranceStorm - I see a connection between TranceStorm and Radfield forming when I filter him. TS often references Radfield's arguements. TS also attacked prplhz early on

On September 19 2011 10:12 wherebugsgo wrote:


No, I'm saying scum were already voting me.

Jackal tried making up a reason to vote me and it failed pretty hard.

On September 19 2011 10:35 Jackal58 wrote:

I just think we're all better off without you and the ring in the game.

On September 19 2011 10:34 Radfield wrote:


You tell us iGrok. Who's the scummiest on that list? You seem to have decided not to answer your own question.

By the way, I found someone to add to your list:

iGrok - suspicious of Drazerk, oops not suspicious of Drazerk anymore. Wants to lynch WBG to see what his role does. Contributes absolutely nothing to the eradorr/prp lynch discussion. Makes a list of a seemingly random segment of players

Who's the scummiest person on your list now?