EPTOn September 17 2011 19:23 xtfftc wrote:
Also, none of the currently discussed lynch targets are viable. They are all easy ones. I'd rather go for a random lynch out of the remaining players.
Also, none of the currently discussed lynch targets are viable. They are all easy ones. I'd rather go for a random lynch out of the remaining players.
". So no, I don't want to pick someone random. I said that I'd rather pick a random player out of the remaining 27 than one of these 3 because lynching them would give us absolutely nothing. "
From his second post. This is a very strange thing to say. How does lynching a random person give us 'more' than one of the 3 day 1 bandwagons? This makes sense if
A. He's scum trying to divert from the possibility of a teammate being lynched.
B. Is scum and implicitly knows none of those 3 candidates are mafia and thus would gives us "nothing".
I can't really make sense of that statement. I'll give xtfftc a chance to clarify his reasoning further.
I'm not happy with Jackal and WBG has been way way way way too active from the very beginning to be mafia.
Way too active from the beginning to be mafia? What does that mean. I've never heard that reason before. Plenty of scum have been active players since the beginning of day 1 in mafia games it happens all the time?
Now he's promising some sort of analysis on 3 players (kind of distracting, should narrow it down to one that he finds most convincing. An analysis that comes up with "I think they're town" is noise). Oddly enough, he starts it at night 1.
I find a lot of holes and mistakes in the logic and the longer posts don't really seem to be saying a lot and what does stand out from them are poor arguments and a sort of refusal to take a serious stance on anything.
