EPTMy Little Pony Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On September 14 2011 11:50 Curu wrote: It's not a lynch lurker policy. It's a lynch-the-player-I-know-will-be-the-most-Anti-Town-regardless-of-alignment wagon and that's sinani. Normally I would be in favour of lynching a scummy read rather than a policy one but sinani took it to ridiculous levels. You tell me what's wrong with this. ##Vote Curu | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On September 14 2011 13:32 Curu wrote: chaos13 went from super convicted and huge walls of text on Forumite to "he's not going to get lynched today" (huh, there wasn't even any other candidate, what made you say that?) to voting for me with a complete blanket reason that he declines to explain or respond to me about. Yeah, cause everyone was voting for Forumite, of course he was gonna get lynched. Go back and read the reactions to it. For the most part it was either completely ignored or ineffectual, I think sevryn and one other voted for him. This post is why I'm voting for you On September 14 2011 11:50 Curu wrote: How are we supposed to be able to tell his alignment? It's the first day, you shouldn't be sure of anyone's alignment. Are you sure of someone's alignment? It's not a lynch lurker policy. It's a lynch-the-player-I-know-will-be-the-most-Anti-Town-regardless-of-alignment wagon and that's sinani. Normally I would be in favour of lynching a scummy read rather than a policy one but sinani took it to ridiculous levels. Just a snapshot of how his play makes me feel. Because you don't care whether he is town or scum. I would have voted you for this regardless of who you were attacking. If you think you've caught scum by attacking sinani, think again. Chances are everyone involved in this are town and scum are sitting back and laughing at it. Now take a step back, re-read, and figure out if you still think sinani is scum. | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On September 13 2011 22:15 tnkted wrote: Eh, I'm not buying the forumite lynch. His initial statements were pretty lame, but he's been acting like an unjustly accused town since then. I want to shift town conversation back to Greymyst. Now I wanted to wait until after the nightpost to say this, but jackie beat me to it. This is a crazy scummy post. Its sheepy, and its a poor attempt to blend in with everyone, etc. His response to the pressure everyone gave him was this: Okay, lets look at the appeals he makes here. He doesn't try to defend his scummy post at all; instead he appeals to the emotional ("Would you rather I didn't post at all?") and then basically restates his first sentence. This is NOT how you react to pressure. A true townie would read their post and either say, "That wasn't scummy at all!" Or they'd defend themselves and explain what they meant. Greymyst did neither. Oh, and then the rest of his posts are all about the d1 post and the clues it might contain, which successfully shields him from having to hunt for scum. ## Vote Greymyst Namely the first line. I read that and went "Yeah, he kinda has", but after going over those posts again, he's probably scum. Take a look at tnkted's case here. I'd be willing to say he's a better town player than this. I don't have time to make a full analysis of him right now and I probably won't anyway since we need a majority to lynch. So vote Forumite. ##unvote ##Vote Forumite | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On September 14 2011 21:20 Forumite wrote: I´m not following this argument, Chaos13, you are saying that you distrust something tnkted said, and that makes me scum? No, when I read tnkted's post I agreed with him without actually reading things over again. Then when I did read things over again I realized I still thought you were scum. I think tnkted is scum for other reasons, and I'll leave that alone until tomorrow or another day cause right now it would just be cluttering up the thread. Not a good thing to introduce new suspects this late into a majority lynch. | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
Are you saying my giant post on Forumite wasn't an explanation of why I'm voting for him? I was pretty sure I outlined it fairly well there. | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
Which is why lynching lurkers on D1 usually ends up producing shitty results. They are free to push the lynch off of one of their own lurkers (if any) to a town lurker and actually be supported by the whole town in it rather than scrutinized. Oh well. I need to collect my thoughts on this game. It's been a bit of a mess so far. | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On September 15 2011 19:07 Lucidity wrote: Why do you think it happened fast? i.e. Please quantify your understanding of "fast" with evidence to back up your claim that it did happen fast. The same way I saw it happen. Yeah the votes didn't necessarily pile up all at once, but nobody mentioned having a problem with lynching him until I came along, and I was jumped on for that. As soon as his name was mentioned along with the tag lurking everyone immediately went "Yeah, he's anti-town." That's how it built up fast. | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
Good luck everyone | ||
| ||
