EPTResurrection Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 29 2011 06:17 iGrok wrote: I'll mark you as a replacement. Even if its a mini, it'll be slightly long for a mini fine by me. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 30 2011 09:12 Sknowman wrote: Hump: Palmar I like your style | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 31 2011 07:41 redFF wrote: HAPPY BIRTHDAY ON I'm not saying happy anything until I see a party hat. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 31 2011 11:48 wherebugsgo wrote: Varp we died together. Like badasses. serves us right for being so active and making such useful posts at night. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
I'd like to reemphasize that i will be moving into my dorm and then starting classes on the 7th and the 9th respectively. My activity level will almost definitely decline at that point, so if i'm not active during times when i usually would be, or have gotten lurky, check the date, because it might not be intentional. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On August 31 2011 08:05 Varpulis wrote: I'm not saying happy anything until I see a party hat. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/DMrP0.jpg) HAPPY BIRTHDAY ON | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
As an aside, claims should never be trusted outright. If we trust every claim, mafia will claim with impunity and we'll get destroyed. Palmar, could we try to start discussion without you tunneling the first person you see? | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 09:18 Palmar wrote: I'm here to find scum, not to please your idea of a "pro-town atmosphere". Bad attitude detected. A pro-town atmosphere makes it easier to achieve the goal of finding scum. If everybody posts on-topic and constructively, and weighs in on every issue and discussion point, the chances of scum going under the radar decrease drastically. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
This achieves all of the goals of a day one lynch (lynch somebody who people have given an opinon on and who will give information when/if we see them flip, as per the goal of a normal game), as well as eliminating a lurker. Lurkers are hard to read and dare i say distracting to the town as the game goes on, so i'd like to take advantage of the tools given to us and get rid of them early. As the game continues we will have more information to go on, and the chances of us accurately lynching more than one scum are increased, so we can lynch normally. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
What's this about comparing me to Kurumi? | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 10:38 redFF wrote: not comparing you to kurumi, just noting how your play is similar to your play in kurumi's game when you were scum. Ah, that. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
You want me to refute an opinion you have about similarities in my play as scum 3 or 4 games ago, which i obviously don't agree with? You have given me nothing to refute. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 11:21 jcarlsoniv wrote: It's going to be natural for people to read into other peoples' play styles. Also, GMarshal...claiming? And shrouded in nonsensical babble. Why? you didn't read the whole post, did you? GMarsal isn't playing. Basing votes and lynches purely off of meta is hit and miss. sometimes it can have accurate results (example being Mig in XLIV) but in other situations, (such as this one) it can lead to mislynches because somebody is playing "off their meta." I seem to get accused of this every other game, actually. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
And you know that chaos13 gave me lots of shit at the beginning of WW mafia, when i was scum, mind you, for doing the exact opposite of what i do in most games? Meta can't be counted on as the main point of an argument. If you're calling me scum because you disagree with my proposal, fine, that's an acceptable argument (though it's wrong) but if your primary reason for voting me is meta, you seriously need to rethink things. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 11:58 redFF wrote: meh your first post was still scummy as shit varp, dont lurk, spam or troll, thanks for the tip. what happens in almost every game? People lurk, I thought it was pertinent to add that little tip. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
nice tunnel bro. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 12:25 redFF wrote: ... lol if im tunneling no point in worrying bout me why don't you just scumhunt? because there are 2 pages of posts so far and half the people in the game haven't even posted yet, maybe? Damned if I do, damned if i don't. I'm going to bed. finger's crossed that RedFF will see sense by the time i wake up. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
I'm not going to try to defend myself past this statement: I'm town. If you lynch me, you bring yourselves one step closer to lylo and one step further from winning. If you're deciding upon a scumteam based on who is defending me, you're going to lose this game handily. I'm going to try and reread the thread and find a better lynch than me. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 01 2011 12:02 wherebugsgo wrote: ACE IS SCUM OMG On September 02 2011 00:53 wherebugsgo wrote: Oh herro framer  On that subject (sort of) we don't get the role information from our lynches, correct? Even from the second lynch? So then how do we find out if we struck red? We don't? These are WBG's only 2 posts in game, barring a question to the host. I know you can do better than this. Step it up and contribute. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
Here's what I see: A shitty bandwagon that scum feel free to join, wherein anybody disagreeing is scum because I'm scum herp derp. I'm down with lynching Kenpanchi, he's unreadable and lurks in every game he plays. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
The people saying that we shouldn't revive lynches are right. If scum want a lynch back, let them do it themselves. Zombies are temporary, so unless they're as scummy as scummy can be, lynching them night not be necessary. If they're increasing kp, by all means lynch lynch lynch, but if you believe mafia to have, for example, 3 players left, a zombie won't actually increase their kp, so you might as well just wait for them to die. High priest should be reviving night kills, because those are far more likely to be town. Without further ado, my reads: Jackal58 + Show Spoiler + leaning green, but there's not much to go on. he's playing his usual style as far as i can tell, and the reasoning behind his vote is relatively sound. RedFF + Show Spoiler + He's wrong, but he's not mafia. His suspicion and application of pressure and moderate tunneling are both pro town and effective. Sknowman + Show Spoiler + lurky, but his one post is good and informative. Not sure, leaning town. Kenpachi + Show Spoiler + no fucking clue, as usual. Wherebugsgo + Show Spoiler + scummy. Most of his posts are talking about mechanics and plans, aka "hey look i'm contributing without actually taking a stance or giving reads." Then he jumps on ace, who's as much lynch bait as i am at this point. sinani206 + Show Spoiler + also scummy. Soft defends me and then votes redFF with the explanation "he's scummy." When that doesn't work he jumps on the bumatlarge wagon again with the explanation "he's scummy." No explanation, nothing. Keep a close eye on this guy. Drazerk + Show Spoiler + lurky. Only 2 posts in the game, votes sinani, which i agree with. needs to post more. jcarlsoniv + Show Spoiler + i've got a town read on him, based on his attitude, activity, and the content of his posts. I don't see the scum motives in his posting, but this is more of a gut read than anything else Ace + Show Spoiler + had some early posts that weren't too bad, then started trolling with his journal. Null read, would like to see him actually contribute. A player who trolls even when asked to stop is a liability. OriginalName + Show Spoiler + Doesn't like meta lynching, votes Kenpachi on meta (???). contradiction, scummy. Needs to post more Palmar + Show Spoiler + Strong town. considers multiple points of view, and is able to step out of tunnel vision and make objective decisions. Filter him if you need any more convincing Chaos13 + Show Spoiler + wishy washy as hell. Not taking risks, votes palmar because Palmar was mean to him (aka didn't listen to his atmosphere post) Leaning scum bumatlarge + Show Spoiler + votes me because i made a "useless post" when there was nothing to discuss or post about. Unvotes with literally the same clause as redff (I still think he's scum, but let's lynch somebody else) Makes little sense to me. votes kenpachi on meta. I disagree with his posts about the high priest always reviving lynches. tl;dr the following people are scummy: WBG sinani206 Chaos13 bumatlarge Out of that pool, I'd like to lynch either sinani or bum. I'll look at the vote counts (I think i'll have to look through manually, but whatever) then make my decision with a proper accusation. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
-chaos13 - Varpulis 1 - - - -Kenpachi Kenpachi 2 -bumatlarge -OriginalName redFF 0 - bumatlarge 2 -Palmar -sinani206 jcarlsoniv 1 -Sknowman Chaos13 1 -Jackal58 I count 8 votes, which means almost half the town hasn't voted yet. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 04:31 jcarlsoniv wrote: This is not accurate. I know at least myself and Draz have voted for sinani. did you ad "##" to the beginning of your vote? because if not i didn't find it. I did a search for "##" with the thread set to all. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 02 2011 14:37 sinani206 wrote: I'm sorry, I though it would be obvious that I knew that you thought I could be scum. I have acknowledged this in previous posts. Anyway, redFF just keeps feeling more and more scummy to me. I will put my vote on him for now. ##Vote: redFF PS: I know you think I'm not contributing too. I'm explicitly acknowledging this so that you don't think that I'm disregarding it. terrible vote. "he's scummy." is a shitty cop-out vote reason for scum who know that they can't make a plausible case. his PS is BS, basically saying "yeah i know i haven't been contributing, please don't vote for me." On September 03 2011 01:40 sinani206 wrote: Meh. I'm the first suspect in this game too, it seems. Anyway, I can see that I'm not going to get a case for redFF going, so I'm going to change to bumatlarge, who was my next suspect anyway. ##Vote: bumatlarge "my attempt to start a wagon against redFF failed miserably, i'm going to go and hop onto another wagon without explaining anything at all." Also, right now the votes are INCREDIBLY spread out. something like 11/15 people have voted, and we've got a bunch of people tied with 2 votes. With a roleblock and/or an unlucky pious, scum can really screw us over and ensure that only townies die if we don't refocus and get votes piled up on 2 or 3 candidates. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
To those critiquing my giving reads on everybody, even when i didn't have a solid read: I did this before tallying up the votes, under the assumption that i was going to get lynched. More reads from a dead townie is better than less, was the logic i followed. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 04:49 Varpulis wrote: there is no voting thread WBG. ebwop | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 05:03 OriginalName wrote: NOTE THE BOLDED/ITALICS/UNDERLINED SECTION OF THAT -_- It's kenpachi. I'll gladly vote for him if you can show me examples of him not shitposting as town. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 05:28 bumatlarge wrote: High priest does revive at day not night FUCK had it backwards, my bad sandroba. but there aren't any night, according to the OP. This works like WW Mafia with concurrent day/night phases. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 05:28 bumatlarge wrote: High priest does revive at day not night FUCK had it backwards, my bad sandroba. but there aren't any nights, according to the OP. This works like WW Mafia with concurrent day/night phases. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 03 2011 05:51 jcarlsoniv wrote: I was about to get real mad at people not reading the thread again, but that description seems rather ambiguous. I'm going to assume it's once per day, but clarification would be nice. It's basically a detective for corpses, so i'd assume once per day. I've got to go, I'll check back in after the lynch, assuming i'm still alive. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 04 2011 22:17 wherebugsgo wrote: joncarl whatever the hell his name is. joncarlsoniv. I memorized the name at the beginning, because i care. (I'm still dead, don't worry) | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
If you're reading this, it means those assholes lynched me while i was eating dinner and didn't resurrect me. Bastards + Show Spoiler + I'm just kidding, <3 all you guys, I hope to be able to play more once i get settled into my school schedule | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
 | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On September 06 2011 11:44 GMarshal wrote: As a spectator I kindly request we cut the flaming. ^_^ | ||
| ||
