TL Mafia L

On January 08 2012 02:57 Toadesstern wrote:


we're only at 39 players right now and got 50 slots. Why is everyone going for replacements right now instead of just joining as a player?
Is the list not up to date or is this some kind of trickery ? :p

On January 11 2012 00:12 supersoft wrote:
lol definitely

now tell me what the meaning of this is:

+ Show Spoiler +

On January 14 2012 00:51 igabod wrote:
I think that DT(s) should check people who ran for mayor, but didn't get the position. Vigilantes should probably save their hits untlil they are almost certain someone is scum.

On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote:


Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor.

On January 14 2012 01:29 Jackal58 wrote:

And what is wrong with the threat of a lynch on a BG? If you don't think scum aren't going to try to sub in at least 1 of them as a BG you're being quite unrealistic. Just leave the threat of it out there.

On January 14 2012 01:35 Palmar wrote:


Ciryandor, for speculating about if sandroba or I were going for the mayor position.

On January 14 2012 01:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
blahz0r, I see that you voted for me yet didn't say a THING in thread. Care to come play the game with us? Why do you support my election sir?

On January 14 2012 05:35 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

It's discussing the set-up, we don't really need that when we could be scum hunting.
There is enough information generated by elections already.

On January 14 2012 05:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


I feel like I might get shot? Mafia has to outweigh the importance of the mason role. Do they risk outing themselves faster by killing me, or keep me alive and hope that i get offed by town?

Do I think I will die, at some point yes, totally depends on how the game rolls.

On January 14 2012 05:48 Mattchew wrote:


so is it safer to have him not in office in your opinion?

On January 14 2012 09:25 Kenpachi wrote:
day1 sucks. ill vote the bandwagon.

On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote:


So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case?

Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case?

On January 14 2012 20:16 Palmar wrote:
Cause I feel like it Kurumi.

On January 14 2012 20:18 Palmar wrote:
Day 1 has two goals, getting someone I want in office, and killing someone I want to kill. Incog and Ciryandor fit the bill, my work is done here.

On January 14 2012 22:13 L wrote:
Holy Jalapenos. Just noticed my game started. Time to catch up.

On January 15 2012 03:12 Ciryandor wrote:
Whew, finally caught up after 25+ pages. Seriously. I just got home from being away all day today and had a long day at work yesterday, and people think I'm a good lynch candidate, especially for like half the mayor candidates? That's just fine and dandy, but there are other players who fit the same criterion.

Some reads on players of interest:
I honestly think GGQ has just as bad a posting history as mine, and that he has escaped scrutiny by creating an FoS on me just because I was asking why I should be believing the early candidates like Cyber_Cheese instead of Mr. Wiggles during that time.

I also can't blame Protactinium for thinking I'm bad as well with my responses, but I wouldn't vote for him just because he thinks BC is scum, and he hasn't buttressed that argument since. As far as I've read, I think BC has townie interests at heart and is in the usual situation with leading mayor candidates, having a hard time justifying what he would do with the position beyond the Day 1 lynch power, but a point against him as well is that he has not delivered his mason partner, which he had decided to reveal in one of his posts.

Also, risk.nuke being suddenly defensive after some criticism of him making a half hearted push for mayor is IMO very newbie townie play, or a scum being baited to attract others' attention to him. This should be noted as I think risk is noob town who does not know how to defend his positions properly.

Just a question, where is Kurumi? At least sandroba has posted even if he thinks I'm scummy for asking if he's running, and Palmar has said he doesn't really care now about the vote; which is uncharacteristically sour of him. I read Palmar as trolling town more than scum because of that, as he would have probably given a token "I support someone because they're worth trusting" post (as that could influence newbies/lurkers) who see people commenting at him being a veteran voting that way at the very least if he were scum.

Finally, I have to note that Bill's post that it is likely we have a scum candidate among the front-runners leads me to think we should actually do a vote-swing to a random strong candidate, and that the votes for that person should come from people who have already voted, as IMO it is more likely for scum to have delayed voting to have more influence over the result in a close race and not waste votes in a throw-away push for their candidate if a runaway win were to happen. Right now I'm torn between Proact and Sandroba in voting, because at least they're concrete in promising ONE NAME to lynch instead of being wishy-washy in getting a list of targets up, and that I think they have plans for town after Day 1 that don't need to be publicized yet.

On January 15 2012 03:34 Mattchew wrote:


what is a cloaked kingmaker?

and how is that a lie.

On January 15 2012 06:51 risk.nuke wrote:

This doesn't rule out scum mason.

On January 15 2012 07:22 Kenpachi wrote:

cool

i dont care

On January 15 2012 07:23 Kenpachi wrote:

no man i told you im townie

On January 15 2012 07:25 Kenpachi wrote:
i was sleeping

On January 15 2012 07:27 Kenpachi wrote:
no

On January 15 2012 07:29 Kenpachi wrote:

pure coincidence.

look i dont see what information youll get out of interrogating me for waking up right now

On January 15 2012 22:16 Jayjay54 wrote:

why is that

On January 16 2012 00:07 Jackal58 wrote:

Always. Rereading the game. And fwiw I agreed with Bugs on Palmar. If he hadn't been calling for him to be lynched I would have.

On January 16 2012 00:45 rtgICEMAN wrote:
Why kenpachi ? Why cyriandor ?

On January 16 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:


I like how you don't do this.

On January 16 2012 05:49 wherebugsgo wrote:


probably the one that kills you.

Or that Polish vodka, that shit is strong.

You scum this game btw?

Sandro where are you? Foolish where are you?

On January 16 2012 06:01 wherebugsgo wrote:


I'm just kidding, I don't actually want you dead.

What do you think of sandroba? BC? Protact?