EPTYou haven't done anything similar to this all game so I find it very strange.
TL Mafia L - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
You haven't done anything similar to this all game so I find it very strange. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
On January 17 2012 09:18 Kenpachi wrote: what the fuck. are you joking or something No. I'm most definitely getting carried away with this but I'm not joking. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
On January 17 2012 08:33 wherebugsgo wrote: ##vote Protactinium On my phone; in short, massive slip. When the "day 1 summary" was posted by Protactinium, it suggested that there was pre-knowledge that the chaos was town-induced. Note how Protactinium never questions that the people who pushed Palmar for lynch (WBG and other hardliners) were anything but town. It's not possible to make absolute generalizations like Protactinium is doing unless there's knowledge that those generalizations are true. That knowledge is only available to scum. I'll post more about this shortly when I get comp access. As opposed to: "Note how Protactinium never questions that I or the other people who pushed Palmar for lynch were anything but town" This is the line that I'm wondering about. I don't know why you are claiming it doesn't exist or why you are so indignant. It just read incredibly fishy. I've never referred to myself like this online and I've never seen anyone else do it. You aren't omitting anything you substituted in an acronym for your nickname that I have never seen you use and everyone else commonly uses. Add Kenpachi coming out of no where to make me feel like a dipshit with no reasoning and I'm just more suspicious. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
Maybe you're paraphrasing and I've caught you on absolutely nothing but for now I'm putting in my vote to ##vote wherebugsgo | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
On January 17 2012 10:27 wherebugsgo wrote: LOL You're jailing them to lower their KP? Is that even how the KP functions in this game? You should be jailing to protect. Also, you're pretty much wrong about mafia KP being 3 yesterday. If you truly believe mafia KP was 3 why aren't you calling kita scum for his hit claim? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=253716¤tpage=93#1860 it wasn't a direct quote since I was on my phone, I just paraphrased it. fair enough. kenpachi if this is why you were scolding me you're justified but stop being a dick and start being helpful please. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
Anyways I'm all for voting Bill Murray as his behavior yesterday was incredibly erratic. Which leads me to this post and my second vote: On January 18 2012 11:20 supersoft wrote: I am voting Chaosquo. I like cybercheeses case against him the most. The case against BM is hard to understand for me right now. I propose that we lynch this macpo guy (even if town, he's no real loss/he won't be able to reestablish his innocence even if he's town) and Caosque. I just read through BMs filter and I don't see it. This post seems extremely odd for a number of reasons, first of all he has this proposition that we lynch macpo, but refuses in putting his vote in for him. I cannot understand why a townie would come in with a post explaining his vote and feel it necessary to express his distaste for another player he wasn't voting for but oddly still supports lynching. Feels like he doesn't want to vote Macpo but at the same time wants to get in this last sliver of distrust so his intentions aren't questioned at the time. Secondly, he just latches on to another case when explaining his vote (keep in mind even cybercheese didn't feel strongly enough to vote for Chaosquo), this feels like a lazy cop-out for having to post an explanation. Finally he has this bit about the case against BM being hard to understand. I have this as the weakest point because it is buttressed if BM flips red, but I thought all along the BM case was incredibly clear cut. He made some odd claims and had a lot of erratic behavior, which not surprisingly drew a lot of suspicion. Even if you don't agree with it I don't think it at any time has been difficult to grasp why people want him lynched. Couple that with this suspicious chain of posts following L's candidacy for Mayor and I feel strongly enough to make this my second vote today. "Maybe I'll vote for L" "BM most likely town!!" bs #mafiatalk ##Vote Bill Murray and ##Vote supersoft guys!! Ferrr liquidia! | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
And VE I know we have a lot of candidates. The important thing is that we get the ones we feel the most strongly about. And I feel like this case is a home run. Clear cut. Lazy voting behavior. He even manages to bus his own team member while voting for someone else. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
1) I need to vote and explain myself - enter line 1: "I am voting Chaosquo. I like cybercheeses case against him the most." GREAT DONE! 2) I need to distance myself from Macpo, he's a goner - enter "I propose that we lynch this macpo guy (even if town, he's no real loss/he won't be able to reestablish his innocence even if he's town) and Caosque." He even says "this macpo guy" yeah "this guy I have no relation to at all, I don't know him, never did, don't get any ideas" 3) (again I'm less sure on this but it fits if BM is mafia) BM looks to be in trouble tomorrow, we can't lose our mafia sheriff, I need to inject some doubt - gives you the junk between where he "can't understand" and "can't see it" It don't think I could write up a more clear cut case. His not even being able to provide any solid reasoning for disliking a BM lynch just makes me more set. ##vote Bill Murray ##vote supersoft | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
"i really didn't care too much about yesterday's lynch" "i was okay with" "I don't mind being lynched" | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
Day 1 during the Mayor vote we had like 20 pages of useless Mason talk, so I spoke to that, what little bit I could but mostly I was disappointed as I said it was very difficult to focus on who was the best candidate during that mess. Yes I didn't make a stand at that exact moment but it was very difficult to do so at the time. The thread was in ruins. Again I don't see what you are trying to prove by showing my reasoning for voting Protactinium for mayor. I feel that while it isn't the most verbose explanation it is very to the point and says exactly why the other candidates were deficient. It doesn't leave anything to the imagination. I wanted to get a mayor who wanted to hang some mafia members and I voted for one who is 2 for 2 thus far. As for the Palmar thing, yeah it doesn't help so much when you say "I told you so!" after the fact but I couldn't help myself. The lynch Palmar drive based on meta didn't sit well with me and that was another big factor why I voted for Protactinium. I know I made a promise to go through the thread again, but sometimes I just have to get away from this game it is very time consuming as is and eventually you have to pull yourself away to do other things. That said, I feel I just presented a very strong case and we have 2 for-sure mafia who just exposed themselves in BM and supersoft. I trust that town will see these two for what they really are and take them down. In the next quote I am not using this "I'm a n00b" defense at all. Kitaman raises a question about why I didn't care about masons/Palmar meta discussion and instead only cared about the election. I told him I don't have experience with masons and I have never played with Palmar to know the meta that the lynch was based upon. But I never said "I'm a n00b." You're really grasping at straws here if that's what you got out of it. Now you list a hoarde of posts that are short questions. I saw what I thought were questionable actions by players. In a few of the cases they were misunderstandings and mistakes in reading what was posted. They were very real. I thought wherebugsgo made a serious slip for a second and voted for him but I was proven wrong and shown that he was just paraphrasing what someone else said. It wasn't obvious and it was quite confusing as there was no context given. Kenpachi swoops in being the troll he is and gets under my skin a little. I'm human. Whoop de doo. | ||
| ||
