|
On January 16 2012 16:22 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Hi all, today we are lynching GGQ. Town has played without direction so far so I'm going to change that. An analysis post will be made early tomorrow PST. In the meantime I will be awake and active on my itouch for an hour or so. Feel free to ask me any questions as long as the answer does not involve copy/pasting quotes.
This had better be one excellent analysis post because as I see it GGQ is definitely not the play today.
|
On January 16 2012 17:39 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2012 17:13 Scamp wrote:On January 16 2012 16:22 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Hi all, today we are lynching GGQ. Town has played without direction so far so I'm going to change that. An analysis post will be made early tomorrow PST. In the meantime I will be awake and active on my itouch for an hour or so. Feel free to ask me any questions as long as the answer does not involve copy/pasting quotes.
This had better be one excellent analysis post because as I see it GGQ is definitely not the play today. Pray tell who do you think is the right play? I looked back through your filter and was left baffled by the lack of substance. Congratulations! You earned yourself a spot of the "people getting analyzed tomorrow" list.
I find it hard to believe you're calling me out for lack of substance and can't figure out who I would call out to be on the list. It should be easy to spot if there isn't much there.
I actually am not opposed to what you're proposing, I just find it suspect that you think you have the right to do such a thing. As in, what exactly makes you think we should listen to you? Also, we have a list of five people to talk about but GGQ is a slam dunk?
Like I said, this analysis of yours had better be damn good.
|
It's called accountability, and it's also called playing the game well. Since you have no interest in either of those things, it makes perfect sense that you would vote for me as a knee-jerk reaction.
I expect you to try to find scum when you're done crying.
|
WBG, you're not finding any scum, you're acting like a spoiled brat. And it's better to be "useless" than a detriment to the town. Did you not notice that Meapak has flagged you for discussion? Nothing to say about it?
The point is after Palmar you're carrying on without any substance. If day 1 were a normal vote Palmar would not have been lynched. You've also said that you would look into certain people, but have failed to do so. All I'm saying is to stop carrying on like the Palmar lynch was not a gigantic mistake.
And please. I specifically name Sheth in that quote, but you didn't even look at what Sheth said? If you do, it's obvious you've taken my quote way out of context.
Your little tirade against me is moronic and shows exceptionally minimal effort. It's hard to believe that you're trying to scumhunt when that's the result.
As is, this has gone on long enough. There is no point to this and I don't want it to become a distraction. I will not reply to anything more you have to say about me.
|
Well neat, you're looking into people. Didn't expect that to pop up in the time it took me to reply. I commend you for that.
Still, though, did you look at what Meapak posted? I'd like your thoughts on that.
|
Okay, whoever is voting for the double-lynch needs to either cut it out or actually give a good explanation for it. I've already explained why it's a better idea to wait for practically every reason possible. If someone has a good reason for using the DL now, I'd love to hear it.
Did anyone else notice Protact's long post on page 92 that makes a case against Ciryandor as if he's still alive?
Also people need to take a serious look at Ciryandor's filter in it's entirety. Don't just listen to the parts people have picked out. There is a definite link to him and Protact/Sandroba as well as a distancing to GGQ. Yes it's possible that he was intentionally trying to bus GGQ and buddy up to a townie duo but that's no reason to dismiss the evidence.
However, I am not acting on any of these suspicions because it's far more important right now to get everyone talking rather than single out and tunnel one person. There's more than enough discussion today for everyone to speak on something. You don't need to contribute with lengthy analysis or anything, but you do need to contribute. Right now we really need to hear from BC, BM, L, and GGQ, amongst a smattering of others.
|
On January 17 2012 09:58 Protactinium wrote:
Everyone is talking too much about bussing when it doesn't really make any sense at this point.
This I will quote for truth.
|
On January 17 2012 10:04 Protactinium wrote:
Another example of people who don't read. That post was a re-post of a post I posted on the wrong account before Ciryandor flipped red.
Ah, you're right. My mistake.
I still don't think GGQ is the right play, though. Can we hear from Macpo?
|
BC for the love of god, why did you think it was a good idea to post up a large case against Jackal when we already have a number of suspects to work through?
|
If you really think Jackal is the best play, I don't mind the large case. I'm just opposed to gigantic distractions.
Macpo is currently the clear play. I wish he would say something.
|
Double lynch activates for the next day. We don't just instantly get another vote.
|
Jayjay is getting really annoying with his anti-Macpo lynch posts.
Can you please explain what information GGQ gets us as compared to Macpo? And correct me if I'm wrong but isn't he going to get modkilled too?
Not that we should expect modkills to do the work for us.
|
You get modkilled if you don't vote, please read the OP.
And yeah, if your going to go with the information argument you need a lot more than what you're saying GGQ provides us.
|
"Probably" and "whatever". That tells me all I need to know.
|
By the way, Jayjay. If you feel that way about our lynch, why the hell are you voting for a double lynch?
|
On January 18 2012 05:28 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2012 05:23 Scamp wrote:
By the way, Jayjay. If you feel that way about our lynch, why the hell are you voting for a double lynch? because I think there is an abundance of lynch candidates. sandro, BC, chaos, ggq. a double lynch also enchances the chances of lynching an established player. e.g if today was a double lynch the race for the second place would be REALLY interesting.
No, if everyone had two votes this day there would also be 17 votes on GGQ and you would think he is town as well.
Enhances the chances of lynching an established player? What?
|
GGQ just voted without posting.
Interesting.
|
And there we go.
I agree with sleep. Night y'all.
|
Guys stop relying on meta.
|
On January 19 2012 12:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
Scamp has spent the majority of the game criticizing others' play. My problem with this is that his play has been nothing to write home about. His advice is "Stop relying on meta." My advice is WATCH HIM!
The irony here is that if you knew my meta at all you wouldn't be saying this.
On January 19 2012 12:40 VisceraEyes wrote:
Something doesn't feel right.
BM didn't incarcerate L.
Toad got shot.
I got shot.
Bill needs to get in here and tell us who he incarcerated. I'm totally not ruling out the possibility that a vig tried to shoot Toad, but that means that there are only 3 Mafia KP...which means that Bill incarcerated scum last night.
I don't know...something smells fishy.
Actually, before we even do this I think we should clarify when mafia KP goes down. It says under the Sheriff description that mafia KP may go down but it doesn't say exactly when.
If a mafia is incarcerated which would cause the KP to decrease, would it decrease for that evening or the next?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
