Personality Mafia! - Page 5

On August 17 2011 03:17 Jackal58 wrote:

OMFG! YOU CAN DO A BETTER FUCKING COAG THAN THAT!!!!!!!!

On August 17 2011 03:59 Curu wrote:


I know you have. This is partially all your fault, except it's even worse this time.

On August 17 2011 05:19 Pandain wrote:
We should not kill Bumatlarge

Has he been retarded? Yes


But just because someone is being dumb is not a reason to lynch him. For example, see almost every game I play. I always end up doing something dumb, and get lynched. But I always have the truest intentions.

The point is, bumatlarge hasn't been scummy, he's just been shady. And that's an important distinction. When seeing someone who's doing "off" things, we need to look at if they have a mafia INTENTION when they do it.

Would a mafia be so reckless and careless when defending himself? Not unless he has already given up, in which case we would've at least seen a defense from him intentionally.

Would a mafia have been so reckless as to FRICKIN NUKE KAVDRAGON? I mean seriously, that was just retarded.

I feel Bumatlarge is town just for the pure fact he hasn't acted mafiaesque. Yes he's acted shady, but remember the difference. He hasn't been extremely active to appear pro town. He hasn't been inactive either.

Furthormore, the fact that there has been no resistance to bumatlarge being lynched has me worried. I feel like mafia are just letting town mislynch again and again, while usually when a mafia gets lynched they always at least offer up a counter lynch.


I'm not sure exactly who to lynch, but I'm sure there are better options then bumatlarge. I'll analyze and report my findings soon.

On August 17 2011 05:19 Pandain wrote:
We should not kill Bumatlarge

Has he been retarded? Yes


But just because someone is being dumb is not a reason to lynch him. For example, see almost every game I play. I always end up doing something dumb, and get lynched. But I always have the truest intentions.

The point is, bumatlarge hasn't been scummy, he's just been shady. And that's an important distinction. When seeing someone who's doing "off" things, we need to look at if they have a mafia INTENTION when they do it.

Would a mafia be so reckless and careless when defending himself? Not unless he has already given up, in which case we would've at least seen a defense from him intentionally.

Would a mafia have been so reckless as to FRICKIN NUKE KAVDRAGON? I mean seriously, that was just retarded.

I feel Bumatlarge is town just for the pure fact he hasn't acted mafiaesque. Yes he's acted shady, but remember the difference. He hasn't been extremely active to appear pro town. He hasn't been inactive either.

Furthormore, the fact that there has been no resistance to bumatlarge being lynched has me worried. I feel like mafia are just letting town mislynch again and again, while usually when a mafia gets lynched they always at least offer up a counter lynch.


I'm not sure exactly who to lynch, but I'm sure there are better options then bumatlarge. I'll analyze and report my findings soon.

On August 17 2011 08:40 Jackal58 wrote:
If Aidnai had flipped scum I could have confirmed 2 personalities as town. Was not to be.

Curu - How do you pick the players you are defending?

On August 17 2011 08:40 Jackal58 wrote:
If Aidnai had flipped scum I could have confirmed 2 personalities as town. Was not to be.

Curu - How do you pick the players you are defending?

On August 18 2011 02:37 Jackal58 wrote:
I'd be down with lynching LSB instead.