Well. The game hasn't started yet. I wouldn't have /out if the game already started and the roles were sent out, but the hosts delayed the start of this game by another day.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 00:58 GMT

#207

As I said, the game technically hasn't started yet, as the hosts delayed the game by a day. If it started as scheduled and the roles PMs were sent, I wouldn't have opted out.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 01:06 GMT

#209

... If the roles were already assigned, then I guess I have to stay.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 01:34 GMT

#213

On May 04 2011 10:16 KillerSOS wrote:
We don't want someone who doesn't want to play.

Rofl

I doubt I can be active in both games.

It's not that I don't want to play. I just found Ver's role list very compelling.

However, I do realize that the hosts could be flustered by this.

I'll just stay in this game. I'll still do my best in here.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 03:03 GMT

#254

Well, what did I expect after that fiasco before the game started.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 05:46 GMT

#292

Is Irish a new player? Could make sense if he's new - he wouldn't want his first game end so quickly.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 07:36 GMT

#303

redtooth, what was the name of your smurf during haunted mafia?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 07:38 GMT

#304

Oh, and insane 2 too. Both games you apparently went by another name.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 08:19 GMT

#306

Lies.

Haunted Mafia:

On October 24 2010 07:47 redtooth wrote:
vote HeavOnEarth

On October 24 2010 09:58 LSB wrote:

Show nested quote +

redtooth isn't playing.
He probably forgot to log onto his smurf

Insane

On April 04 2011 18:20 redtooth wrote:
can we wait til insane 2 ends? then i can be in this one =)

Another (as of yet unknown) game:

On March 15 2011 05:31 redtooth wrote:
can i /in?
i haven't played a game in so long.
is playing in 2 concurrent games still allowed?

not the item game btw.

Lynch all liars.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 20:22 GMT

#409

Anyway. Redtooth insisted on wasting town's time by focusing on "sharing mafia experiences" instead of actual scumhunting - why does previous experience matter? That's not the focus we should have at this point.

And yet he posted his inane essay trying to derail the whole thread. I still insist that he's a red.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 20:34 GMT

#415

Right now all evidence is circumstantial, but if I had to make a pick, I still think it's redtooth.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 04 2011 21:36 GMT

#437

So we're just letting people divert our attention from the actual scum posts. Redtooth has shown clear signs of scummy behavior, both in his lies, his attempts to turn this discussion into useless pages about "experience," his lies, his inane essay posts without any real substance, his lies, his lies, and his lies.

And we're just letting the suspicion go just like that?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 05 2011 19:15 GMT

#688

On May 06 2011 02:49 chaoser wrote:
[image loading]

Great post. We need to look at the people who've been pointing fingers indiscriminately, like 5, 18, and 22.

Hmm...

I'm trying to see a pattern here between the players the reds want to coordinate against or no.

Are the numbers in chronological order of the way they were speaking out against?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 05 2011 19:20 GMT

#690

Oh and 17 too.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

May 05 2011 19:23 GMT

#692

I mean - in terms of the order they spoke in the thread- i.e. chaoser, in order, accused 27, 21, 1, 22, 15, 9 in the thread within the span of 1 day.

Hm.

Can you give me this spreadsheet? I may have some pattern recognition software that I might be able to gather, and coordinate the time of the accusatory posts with the contents to see if a particular group of players (reds) were on-line and accusing the same person at around the same point in time.