EPTLooking forward to playing.
Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia I
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Looking forward to playing. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 14 2011 00:17 GMarshal wrote: Alignment checks are PMed to the detective. Unless the game says its no flip it is assumed that players are flipped on death Full flip, so a dead doctor shows up as the Doctor, or partial, the doctor shows up as Town? | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 15 2011 15:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote: we vets should take over this thread, flame the shit out of everyone and cause utter destruction. >.< I hope we don´t get too many non-player posts, they are basically flooding the debate, making it harder to see what´s going on. On April 15 2011 11:41 Shcoleosis wrote: I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky. Lynching inactives is a decent tactic, because scum usually try to stay under the radar and not help so much, then again any mafia with 5 minutes on the internet would know that and try to post more to avoid the first blasts. Been reading through these first posts and these are my first notes, not complete of course, just the first summary. While I partly agree with those who want to lynch people who post little, we should still think about how and why we lynch. It doesn´t take many lynches of slow-posting townies before we loose. Want to lynch inactives emlizzt Zorkmid Eternalmisfit Tries to not lynch inactives, at least yet Senj Scholeosis | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 15 2011 23:03 Zorkmid wrote: This points to Forumrite. It doesn't matter that he posted this before he was even PM'ed.....if my assumption about sandroba holds true, than he has already revealed he AND Forumrite. How do you plead? I don´t understand your analysis at all. I´m in the game, posting, but unfortunately I can´t be online all the time. I will try to compensate by posting more when I can. -------- I see 2 things people should take note off. Please call me out if I misinterpret the situation, I WANT to hear your defence against these accusations. That I accuse Zorkmind immediately after he´s suspicious of me is bad form, but please check his posts if you don´t believe me. 1. Ssandroba and Zorkmind are both suspicious of Shcoleosis, apparently because she (?) wants to be carefull about who to lynch. 2. Zorkmind has posted that he is suspicious of Forumite (me), Ssandroba (twice) and Shcoleosis, all three who try to encourage analysis and debate and doesn´t want to lynch innocents. I feel this is scummy behavior because analysis and carefull lynching is what Town wants. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
For the reasons mentioned above in my post, and because Zorkmid hasn´t made any effort at all to change my mind. ---- Is there a voting thread yet? | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 16 2011 03:59 Zorkmid wrote: I'm all up for scumhunting, and will defend myself at any point that I think it's necessary. Let's hear from the lurkers! Why do you accuse those who want debate and analysis? Isn´t that a good way to find Scums? I want an answer from the lurkers too, especially if they are quiet tomorrow too, but the way you focused on them now, at the time that I want answers from you, feels more like you are trying to direct the heat to someone else. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 16 2011 02:34 elmizzt wrote:This seemed retarded at first, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.... I and Eternalmisfit has accused Zorkmid, I think he´s trying to get reasonable people lynched and Eternal noted that he´s subtly derailing the talk. I have Zorkmid and Sandroba against Shcoleosis. Zorkmid thinks Sholeosis doesn´t want to lynch lurkers because his buddy is a lurker, while Sandroba makes a case about how he´s not helping the debate but only stating the obvious. Wants to Lynch Inactives: emlizzt Zorkmid Eternalmisfit Wants to Not Lynch Inactives: Forumite (me) Senj Shcoleosis Still not much to go on, but good to keep in mind for now. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On April 16 2011 06:04 VarpuliS wrote: would you care to share your data with the rest of us? And because I like tripple-posting; Yes, and you are welcome. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Nope, not anymore. Senj and Vain seem like the lurkers now, but I´m not sure, counting their posts in this thread might be a good idea. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
I stand corrected. Senj has posted some, it´s not really a matter of non-posters anymore, but just some posting less, taking less part and taking less room in the debate. Information: Going offline early tonight. Will be back online tomorrow. Play nice while I´m gone. | ||
| ||
