EPTmaybe you want to reply to my PMs and maybe then you will get the strategic play you seek ;(
Insane Mafia 2 - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
maybe you want to reply to my PMs and maybe then you will get the strategic play you seek ;( | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 15:46 Tackster wrote: As far as the IG game goes I personally think all the greens should all agree to Defend until it goes to lower numbers. That way even if the scum only pretend to agree and use their items we might: A) See what their items do B) We could maybe work out who the scum is based on the effects of the items C) Prevent scum from stealing any green items as i told you before, i fully intend to steal tonight. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 20:06 deconduo wrote: Annul has said he has no read on Tack. i never said i had no read on him i said i did not tell jackal my read. big difference. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
in order of scumminess, i have: jackal + tackster tied for level of scum darmo. myself (obviously), lemon, and coag are good people. i also do not suspect darm nearly as much as the other two. if you need my reasons, let me know. but i don't think you do. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 27 2011 03:07 Tackster wrote: LOL annul I definitely want reasons - list them please if bum wants them, i shall give them. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
^^^ are all things bum said/implied. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 27 2011 03:56 Tackster wrote: There is nothing going on in the IG at the moment that is obscured from the main game. this is 100% false don't act like you know who i am in PM chat with. that's the entire point of PM chat: you DON'T know. i have my reasons for FOSing you and jackal. if bum needs them, i will tell him. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 16:20 bumatlarge wrote: Since people in the IG have kept quiet about most things, I'll trust them just saying who is scum. so, he probably doesn't need my reasoning. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
Jackal: Trust me, I am pro Annul: Ok" would never happen | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:34 Mr. Wiggles wrote: So, this is a bit different. While Black will no longer have any interest in winning the items, they may still wish to shoot into the game to kill the assured red. (Not sure how likely this is) this wont happen. black's win condition is to outnumber nonblack. they want to prolong item game as much as possible. they want teams to be reasonably balanced (as opposed to more imbalanced due to controlling 6 items) for as long as possible. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
cool, i agree, and this is what i have been saying from the get go. as for what to do in the future, let's see what the flip is | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
 | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
| ||
