|
On March 27 2011 08:50 Coagulation wrote:
Do you really think if he is scum he would put himself in the spotlight with an elaborate plan to catch scum... when all he would have to do is sit back and let town continue riding the annul is scum wave that the whole town was roaring about earlier.
Think about it?
Whos the easier target annul or tack
Well it's not like it hasn't happened before. BC did it once in a game I think. I don't think it's as likely, but I wouldn't say that's impossible/implausible.
However, I do think that had you said your reasoning for trusting Jackal earlier as "He made a plan with me to confirm ourselves to one another and I don't think mafia would do this" I think we could have avoided a lot of shit.
|
On March 27 2011 09:04 Jackal58 wrote:
You've done nothing but call me scum. How do you propose to eliminate the red and the black from the item game? What's your plan hot shot? How do you propose going about doing it. Oh I know. I'll defend the hell out of my scum buddy. That's your plan.
Ok let's cool it guys, both of you. That's not even real logic anymore. Just cause someone defends someone else that you think is scum, doesn't mean they're scum. I can understand where Insanious is coming from as Tack has been posting pretty pro-town in thread (my opinion) while I also finally understand where you're coming from with Coag. Let's all take a step back and reassess everything.
First we need to think about this Jackal-Coag confirm plan. Even without knowing the details, is it possible for mafia/black to mess it up. And then we need to go over Tack's posts in detail. Are they actually pro-town?
I have a headache from god knows what right now so I'll take some aspirin and lay down for bit to think about it all. I hope everyone else does too.
|
Also, Bum, can we get an update on what your circle is saying about the lynch? Day ends in 2 hours right? At this point I think I'd rather lynch Darm than Jackal/Tack. Will update after I review everything.
|
On March 27 2011 09:20 ilovejonn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 09:19 chaoser wrote:
Also, Bum, can we get an update on what your circle is saying about the lynch? Day ends in 2 hours right? At this point I think I'd rather lynch Darm than Jackal/Tack. Will update after I review everything. Wtf are you talking about, lynching Darm won't do us shit and the Jackal vs Tack debate will go on for another Day. Tack/Jackal has to go today.
I said right now -_- and that I was going to go to review. As in if I had to vote RIGHT NOW, I'm not ready to make a decision on Jackal/Tack. But I will soon. Right after this fucking aspirin kicks in.
|
So yeah, you can turn this thing on all sides, but the only other alternative would be to lynch outside IG and hope neither team has enough brawn to try and wipe out all the others.
IF we hit the item game, I predict a slaughter. But I could be wrong because, as I said, both teams may fear the other team too much to make a move.
okaaaaaaaay.
so who would I pick from item game? Coag, but that's based purely on that little thing I posted regarding his defense of Jackal.
So you talk about how it's bad to hit the item game cause it'll lead to a "slaughter" by your predictions and insinuate that we should lynch someone outside it but then go on to talk about lynching coag when we've already established why his logic and defense of Jackal makes sense?
Yeah...ok....
Also @bum. At this point the Tack/Jackal/Darm situation strikes me like this:
Rereading over Tack's first few posts, it does seem very pro town at first but under review it's basically listing a lot of stuff and writing about things that everyone was talking about: Mayor vote, whether mayor should allow for town vote or not, etc. There wasn't much NEW things added. At the same time, a lot of other people did that to a certain extent. Though the fact that it took a few read-throughs to pick up on this fact worries me. Good scum maybe?
But then, he passed tnkted's (?) test so that gives him some green cred in my mind.
In regards to Jackal, at this point I think Jackal and Coag are way more townie than Tack though just because I finally understand the whole "WE HAVE A CONFIRM EACH OTHER PLAN!! MAFIA WOULDN'T DO THAT!!" situation.
And like you said, darm is lurking and not really posting shit. We all got powers, there's no reason not to get involved if you're town.
Darm>Tack>Jackal right now in terms of scumminess for me.
|
From: LSB [ 3116 posts | Profile | Buddy | Report ]
Subject: Re: Item Game
Date: 3/26/11 11:52
The people in the item game pre-picked their roles, however there may be exceptions.
Original Message From chaoser:
What is the item game?
The item game is a game within a game, so you can play both. Keep in mind, if you sign up for the item game, you will get no other role. Basically I'm giving people the opportunity to pick their roles right now if they want to play the item game
Do you mean that the people in the item game pre-picked their roles and you won't give them another one or that being in the item game is a role aka they are in the item game and they can't be vigi/medic/DT etc. ?
|
|
|
On March 27 2011 10:50 CubEdIn wrote:
That's reserved for the cool posters.
On March 27 2011 10:50 CubEdIn wrote:
And me.
So sad when people are deluded in their own prowess...
|
|
|
On March 27 2011 11:10 annul wrote:
yeah thats not cheating as all darmo ;\
What do you mean?
|
On March 27 2011 13:11 GGQ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 10:55 GGQ wrote:
Voting bumatlarge for mayor.
Suggesting darmousseh as primary lynch target for now. Oh, hi! I know I've been pretty inactive thus far, so I'm quoting this post where I'm the first person wanting to lynch darmousseh in order to boost my credibility in this game. Quality, not quantity! I'm suggesting Lanaia and maybe Amber[Light], after going through all of their posts, as additional blacks. Less sure about reds, but Meapak and OriginalName are on my list. Let's get some suggestions of protects/investigates out there. Specific people, not just generalities.
Supporting a lynch of a red/black player doesn't mean as much as it usually does since reds don't know black and visa versa. It's more important to look at who's against the lynches.
|
On March 27 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote:
yeah no shit kav
Yo, don't be so mean lol, maybe it's not all crap. Kav, you going to post soon? Too drunk, too sleepy, going to go eat some chocolate and vinegar chips and crash . Peace outside motherfuckers, going to sleep.
|
On March 27 2011 14:19 Coagulation wrote:
sorry i was trying to be enthusiastic.
its ok its ok lol <3 <3 <3 coag
|
Oh god....wtf happened...
|
I can't go to sleep and I wake up to a bukkake fest of LIES and PAIN. Don't go annul =[
|
On March 27 2011 16:23 kevconsim wrote:
doesnt everyone lie at some point in this game?
Who here can say they have never lied?
scumslip...?
|
Man...you had bad guidance huh...
|
On March 28 2011 00:21 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 23:43 Tackster wrote:I also want to insert a message here @Annul. You claimed special 'secret' information from the PM circle. As was obvious you outed your PMs and there was absolutely no information that anything was going on except people were basing there opinions on what was going on in the thread anyway. Why keep a secret when a. There is no secret & b. It doesn't help town anyway... I would refer you to: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=3974110 The secret he revealed is you let slip you received a PM from RoL. And as a first time player it's fascinating that you would be picking the "how to play scum tips" to determine how to play.
I call bullshit on the whole "it was a mistake on my part I mixed them up". No fucking way is RoL anywhere close to Jackal. Not to mention he's not in the item game. I bet you looked at your PM box, wrote the first name at the top cause you weren't looking too carefully to make up a lie and it just happened to be RoL. If someone shoots Tack/we decide to lynch him tomorrow and he flips red, we gotta take a look RoL.
|
On March 28 2011 00:59 Tackster wrote:
Besides the only way RoL can PM me is if he's red and i'm red. If that's the case how can I assume he is allowed to PM annul?
If I did make a mistake and use the wrong name why is it more likely that I used a name from another PM and not a name from the main thread? When I started all your names looked like the similar the non-referenced gibberish all over the internet. Now that the game has gotten further I can finally remember (some) of the names of people in this forum.
The point is that he can't PM annul -_-. If they're both mafia and that was some crazy play, which i doubt since annul left the other game too and asked to be replaced, then that's some pretty good acting.
|
On March 28 2011 01:08 LSB wrote:
Question for you guys, what's up with Annul claiming someone broke the rule?
Basically RoL ##shoot annul in thread and then on AIM messaged him a smiley face. So annul thought that the hit went through cause obviously PMs aren't allowed between the two of them I assume. So he figured it was a real hit and he dumped all his info. And then RoL said it was a bluff. Technically the smiley face was cheating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
