EPTInsane Mafia 2 - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
what else would anyone be talking about on night 0 if not the mayoral elections? im sorry if you are too lazy to read 50 pages but thats on you, dont blame me for playing the game. this is why i play this way on early days: go big or go home. but you know what i DID do? i got fuuuucktons of people on the record in a huge, huge way in some cases. even if i didnt win the argument, my long term play won the day. but things change and i adapted. my play is fluid. i find it hilarious how kav, et al pretty much admit i am a town but they still want to get rid of me. warning sign much? we do not have many chances to take out the TEN scum in the game, you know. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
i actually fully believe you are blue now. unrelated to your defense of me, too. i picked up on something subtle. my opposition is dropped. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
i had at least 50% of the contribution prior to conceding when i saw how horrible the items were. i think my inability to convince players as town is not my fault, but more of the fault of most of TL, who fails to see math and/or logic. but alas. "A strong and good argument isn't one that you continue to bash over people's heads even thoguh they disagree. A strong and good argument is one that's can inherently be seen as good and agreed upon by at least a decent amount of people." ... a good argument has nothing to do with the number of people agreeing with it at any time. see: plessy v ferguson. 8-1 decision. and yet the lone dissent swayed the majority in brown v board decades later. "While some (including me) agree with some of your points, the few points that I agree with are drowned out by all the other spam and garbage that you've posted (not to be mean)." so you are willing to admit you agree with at least some of my arguments, but you are literally going to go ad hominem and try to use my METHODOLOGY for presenting the argument as a way to rationalize ignoring it? are you kidding? you literally just admitted to saying "he had points i liked, but lets kill him anyway." i swear the scum just come out so easily these days | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
chalk another one up to someone who does not understand math and game theory its okay, i cannot argue to people who don't even understand the chessboard upon which i place my moves. "and it almost feels like he was spamming intentionally" of course i was "spamming" intentionally. to you its spam, to me it's trying to prove my point, but it most definitely was intentional. i wont even get into your PBPA because honestly you wouldnt even understand my counter arguments anyway. but it looks a lot like confirmation bias to me. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:18 tnkted wrote: and @annul: what are your thoughts on the IG players? i have many thoughts about IG players. i cant tell you what they are, though, because it will interfere with my strategy to win us item game. as long as bumatlarge is laying off of me, i am sure he will have no problems picking one of the other 5 to blow up tonight. depending on the flip tonight i can tell you more. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:26 Rean wrote: Hmmm. It's probably in black's best interest to start killing off the item-game players as fast as possible, while the red's would want to take it easy there to prevent black taking the cake, since black is arguably the biggest threat to the red team at the moment. So with 1 night-kill a time, it comes down to some good analysis and a few lucky medic/dt's for town to walk away with the items. Out of the 6 players currently i've got a gut feeling that Annul is scum (my gut feeling for Annul is notoriously bad though >.>), and as for the second scum... I really don't have a clue, without access to some of the pm's going around it's hard to judge, so i think we're gonna need to rely on IG players to give us some solid analysis. I reckon it's best to DT check annul for now (miller claims will NOT be believed this time  ), medic the best analyzer in there and pray it doesn't all go to hell.rofl yeah rean, lets only say what i said 30 times yesterday... oh, and annul is scum. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
i am dead tomorrow or earlier. don't waste a DT on me. DT somebody else in item game. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:31 Rean wrote: first you want to be voted out day 2 at the earliest and now your fate is sealed? the fuck? i said to give me one night to live. if you want to vote me out day 2 then go for it. i am acting with the presumption that this is going to happen over any protest i have, so i need to play the game knowing this. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
im very close. | ||
| ||
