EPTTL Mafia XXXVII - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
Gofarman
Canada646 Posts
I'm going to bed now, I'll be back before the end of the day I'm sure. | ||
|
LastArgument
United States152 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:26 Foolishness wrote: Did anyone else find something odd about the above post? Which post? Gryfs? or the one below it? | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Gofarman's post. | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:26 Foolishness wrote: Did anyone else find something odd about the above post? 1) pushes bad case on lurkers vs inactives which is null at best on day 1 2) votes someone who isn't even a lurker "to that end" 3) in his next post claims he is "going out", becoming a lurker himself, and an active one I'd rather lynch an active lurker than an inactive one. At least with an inactive one, we might have a chance of convincing the moderator to message them or replace them. | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
Probably, but I'm still stuck on GMarshal's obviously scum-motivated plan | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
HEY HE ONLY POST 3 POSTS AND THEY WERE SUPER FUCKING SCUMMY DURR HURR VOTE VOTE When the days over hes DT or something /facepalm Plus, never really backed with good evidence at all. How about picking off the town that are just skimping through people's posts by agreeing and providing fake insight or something along the lines (ex. GMarshal from Mini Mafia V) | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:32 Kenpachi wrote: And also, the people who want to kill inactives are usually town and end up being lynched after getting all their lynches wrong EBWOQ | ||
|
LastArgument
United States152 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:29 Foolishness wrote: Of course, I giggled inside when you said you didn't want to kill an active player then you voted for one of the top 4 most active people in this game. Gofarman's post. It is odd. I am still a little irked by gryfs before it though. I read the town guide that is here and it seems well, off? It mentions a lot of what we are not supposed to do. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
What's bad is that if the person don't respond and bandwagon on that person happens. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
icemac JBright ohN astroorion ICanFlyLow CubEdIn Ser Aspi Gofarman | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
The smarter ones are the ones who pick up on what I'm doing, and make fun of me for it. See: 3 people claiming vig/veteran last page after I did. It was mainly a joke to judge reactions. I'm liking Foolishness/Kenpachi on this page, not liking GMarshal for the reason i voted him, and now I'm disliking a few other people. I don't like that vote on annul, and I dislike LastArgument's very-weak FoS of me that lacked reasoning. @LastArgument, what, exactly, "irked" you in my post? | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
i just noticed gofarmans post above. disregard him. | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:38 Coagulation wrote: well if gryffindor is bill murray than hes probably making shit up for attention as far as his role claim goes I'm doing that, but I don't know this Bill Murray character you speak of  | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:38 LunarDestiny wrote: Voting inactives are bad, but there are people who will only reply if their names pop up. I understand the game just started, but I think pressure voting to get someone start talking is good. What's bad is that if the person don't respond and bandwagon on that person happens. That's only bad if they're town, unless you want to out every power role haphazardly. Is that what you want? | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:43 Coagulation wrote: gryffindor ARE YOU BILL? my name is Sam, actually, who is Bill? | ||
| ||
