|
Ok, I forgot about the IM chat with annul.
Also, why does Opz need protection, I though vig only got 1 shot?
On December 23 2010 11:48 flamewheel wrote: Vigilante You may, only once during the game, kill a player of your choice during the night.
|
if we have any more vigilantees... next night, please kill Brocket... I want to see if I was right that he is a mafia...
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
Can we get a confirmation that RoL was protected?
|
On January 03 2011 13:26 orgolove wrote: Can we get a confirmation that RoL was protected?
That would require a medic to claim, at worst
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
Hm. It's just, the only likely possibility, apart from the remote sense of two vigilantes acting, one of which targeted RoL, is that medics did not protect RoL. Possibly because of the noise caused by Barundar during the night shame.
Then the hit sequence could've been: 2 hits from reds - to RoL 1 hit from a vigilante, possibly ~OpZ~ - to Node
The only concern then, regarding the vig hit, is that the hit on Node follows mafia's patterns on hitting experienced players. is ~OpZ~ really town aligned? Did he actually hit RoL (unlike what he claimed, "hitting an inactive"), and the mafia hit both RoL and Node?
~OpZ~, can you explain who you hit?
|
Well... RoL posted a list of inactives, and Node was on the list I can let that slide...
Btw, just for me, can we pick at least 1 lynch target(or both...) from these people:
- Meapak_Ziphh - Brocket - Jackal58
|
On January 03 2011 13:59 Insanious wrote: Well... RoL posted a list of lurkers, and Node was on the list I can let that slide... EBWOP
|
On January 03 2011 13:59 Insanious wrote: Well... RoL posted a list of inactives, and Node was on the list I can let that slide...
Btw, just for me, can we pick at least 1 lynch target(or both...) from these people:
- Meapak_Ziphh - Brocket - Jackal58
Meapak still looks scummy to me, just because of that spreadsheet debacle
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
One of the my votes is still on Meapak based on his highly, highly suspicious voting pattern vs annul, which he still has not fully explained.
|
On January 03 2011 13:59 Insanious wrote: Well... RoL posted a list of inactives, and Node was on the list I can let that slide...
Btw, just for me, can we pick at least 1 lynch target(or both...) from these people:
- Meapak_Ziphh - Brocket - Jackal58 I'd say Brocket, he's the only one that voted for you. My votes for double lynch are going to be on Mr. Zergling based on Barundar's analysis + Meapak as of now. I do hope we at least get 1 scum out of this double lynch. Gonna have to review a lot of posts to find other lurking targets.
|
On January 03 2011 13:00 ilovejonn wrote: and lol@Barundar thinking RoL was mafia. =/ My thoughts exactly.
|
I don't have much confidence in my analysis of Mr.Zergling then. My initial thought of Meapak was something was off with him, but I shrug it off as blue. He claimed green though. Will go back and look it over...
|
Just use logic then, try not to apply so much feelings. I read over your analysis and most of it was pretty accurate. And where are our DTs... are they even pming confirmed townies who they used it on? It's so quiet right now... no one is suggesting other targets besides mr.zergling and meapak. Either they are red, gave up and not defending themselves hardcore, or they are not red and the lurkers are watching us fail this double lynch. Hopefully more discussion can arise tmr.
|
Also, I've done my first analysis in HP mafia before, and the result was wrong, sometimes you just gotta live with it.
|
On January 03 2011 12:13 Insanious wrote: So do we have 0 vigilantees or did everyone just attack RoL? Because wow...
Vigilantees should of hit lurkers DTs check lurkers
We should lynch Meapak and Mr.Zergling and thats how today should go...
BTW, anyone who through RoL was red was a dumbass...
RoL spearheaded the lynch on Annul, no mafia would kill their own godfather thats just stupid... so either the mafia double hit RoL or we have a Vig who killed the strongest town left alive...
/rage, and I wanted to go comotose on this game since we got two mafia by day 2... but apparently I need to keep playing now, thx a lot RoL... wait...
wtf were our medics doing? RoL was an obvious hit, why did no medics protect RoL... wtf is this town doing...
/RAGE RAGE RAGE RAGE... *cries*
Alright back to the game, I guess, time to actually go back to looking at what people have been saying since I analyzed meapak and everyone ignored it. Another rage post on how stupid town is?
|
Meh, I was raging pretty hard myself, but I decided not to post something about it.
|
My first death before the very end, here's hoping mafia burned a hit on me. GG all and go get 'em town.
|
Well if I have to mention something positive, both LunarDestiny and Pandain who pushed for annul with me survived. If OpZ did vigi, then I guess that is atleast 3 people I consider confirmed townies...
|
On January 03 2011 12:40 Mr.Zergling wrote: There go two of our best players. I don't think there is anything I can do to convince you that i am not red, so you all are going to waste one of the lynches on me, at least its double. Choose your second more wisely. You could start helping out. What do you think of the meapak vs insanious debate?
We got a double lynch. I feel we should atleast devote 1 of these to a lurker. The people who actually add in with opinions are going to be more valuable in this game for us, mafia or not.
|
First of all ARGHHHHHHHHHH
I told Opz to hit darthien/Ryu. It seems he must've hit RoL. But this is actually good, as I was somewhat suspicious of RoL, so that's another suspect of our chests. Furthormore, it seems that now we do have a confirmed vigialante, as this means 3 kp was used over the course of the night. If another vigilante used a KP, they need to tell me immediately. Otherwise I'm going on the assumption that Opz is confirmed town.
In another news, I was roleblocked last night. I was aware this was a possibility but fortunately it means I am still alive .
With other news, here's the analysis on darth. Small because of lack of posts, but that in itself is noteworthy.
29. Ryuu314/DarthThienAn-likely scum + Show Spoiler +On December 27 2010 17:46 Ryuu314 wrote: Probably. I don't see how else the game could run otherwise.
First off, edited. Very suspicious to me. But I'll share his explanation of it as well. On December 27 2010 18:25 Ryuu314 wrote: Show nested quote +
Oops x[ I remembered after I edited hahaha.
I \was basically gonna say that Coag probably couldn't be mafia as the timing of his ban would probably prevent him from making hits? But then I looked up the time of his ban and it disproves my theory.
First off that really doesn't explain anything. Note that he said "Probably, the game couldn't run otherwise." This implies that he KNEW coag was mafia. Very suspicious post to me. On December 28 2010 11:36 Ryuu314 wrote: I'll be afk for a good bit of time because I'll be flying back the NA from Asia so I'll do some of my noobie analysis (first game woot!) here for the time being.
While the debate between annul and LSB is interesting and they both have quite a few scum posts, I'd go so far as to say that their debate is very non-argumentative. At times in their debate it seems as though they're really arguing about nothing since the debate jumped from whether or not voting inactives was the proper move to do on Day 1. They both more or less agree. Then the debate goes into DT strategy. Again, it still all seems very non-argumentative as at this point in the game, DT strat is pretty pointless as checks will all be more or less random and luck-based. TBH all it really seems like to me is just a bunch of dancing. Granted, it stimulates discussion straight off the bat, but I really don't believe it merits enough to vote for them. As such, I'm going to change my vote to one of the inactives who have yet to post. Immediately said his analysis probably isn't that good("noobie analysis") Then starts to say they might both be scum. Doesn't really go into it, so somewhat suspicious, but it is new content. Unsure about this post. On December 29 2010 18:55 Ryuu314 wrote: Show nested quote +
Threats? :O Seems scummy.
I have to agree with Node on his analysis on Pandain. Before I changed my previous vote from Pandain to why, who was at that time an inactive, Pandain PM'd me asking me why I voted him. Now, it was probably just a little nudge to see why I was voting the way I am and likely fueled by curiosity as anything. Still, after going through all his posts he seems quite too wishy-washy to me. Add to the fact that he hasn't posted anything for quite some time makes me wonder.
Doesn't go into anything, says that since I haven't posted it makes him wonder, finally says I'm wishy washy without going into anything. On December 30 2010 04:34 Ryuu314 wrote: Show nested quote +
Me. But I think that might've been out of curiosity/panic than anything. The bandwagon on him was rather fast and (almost) unjustified.
Well he voted for me, so why would youv ote for an (almost) unjustified bandwagon. Darth hasn't said anything worthwhile, so nothing about that.
|
|
|
|