Team Mini Mafia III BCE

On January 06 2011 23:28 deconduo wrote:
Everyone claims to be a cop and gives out a report, if/when the real cop dies town can then look at what the reports were. Its used in situations with a roleblocker or when theres no medic protection so that cop can't safely claim openly. The biggest disadvantage with it is that mafia can work out who the cop is quicker than normal by eliminating people who give wrong reports.

On January 07 2011 17:10 TheMango wrote:
since we've largely ignored this team, what does everyone think of Deconduo/Chezinu? I haven't seen anything from them except decundo trying to convince everyone to 'hypocop'. I don't get a scum tell from that necessarily, but they have been on the quiet side so far otherwise.

@aidnai: as for flamwheel/orgolove, I don't agree with your analysis aidnai. Orgolove's activity has been spotty in the other game I'm in as well, and I don't see any major deviations in posting (I also do not get a scum feel from him in that game either)

If I had to vote now, it would be between kingjames/aidnai (kingjames for his over the top response in trying to get subversion lynched, which was based off faulty data - aidnai for pushing for 0 discussion during night) and subversion/incognito (for obvious reasons, could be lying about being roleblocked).

I'd like to hear from incognito if possible, since he's been largely MIA this game.

On January 06 2011 01:52 deconduo wrote:


It is beneficial in a number of ways:

1. It encourages activity. People don't want to be lynched, so they will (hopefully) start posting more.

2. It gets rid of inactive townies earlier on rather than later. Mafia have no incentive to kill an inactive townie, so they live until the end of the game if they aren't lynched. You then might need to pick a mafia out of a bunch of people with less that 3 posts each, not at all helpful to town.

3. If the mafia do push the lynch to a green rather than a mafia, we still get to look at the voting patterns and the posts. For example today, who voted for BC/Beneather over other inactives, and why? Were BC/Beneather the most inactive team?

Problems:
-Assuming Nemesis is really a DT, why not pick orgolove night one? why not pick me night two?
-I don't believe Gmarshal et al are scum.
-Doesn't explain Subversion's complete lack of interest in the game.

i dont really see what the point is of DTs checking inactives if its publicly announced. Surely then mafia will just make sure they're not inactive to avoid being detected?

On January 05 2011 09:00 Subversion wrote:
omg, somehow completely fucked something up in the above post, sorry for the random screwed up quotes =/

also need to bold my vote

##Vote Beneather/BC

Oh okay, soz, that actually makes a lot of sense.

Ugh this Day 1 vote is really just.. meh. Really not much to go on. For now I'm going with:

##Vote Beneather/BC

My main reasoning here is that Beneather seems reluctant to say anything without BC being here to give him advice. Seems like a scummy junior would be scared of exposing himself without a senior to run his posts by. Also, BC yet to make an appearance.

The reason nemesis had to fake claim:
Mafia wants to say subversion fake claimed role block, i.e. there isn't really a roleblocker. That means we're in a setup with 1 blue role. Where's the blue? they had to fake claim. Was hoping some team would come along and point this out, but nobody did. Still wanted to believe in ace/meapak, but I really can't now.

On January 11 2011 14:37 aidnai wrote:
making people feel bad. Not as much fun as if I had won, but maybe I learned more this way. GG everyone.

On January 11 2011 15:21 aidnai wrote:
My advice for the future would be to help define the senior's role more clearly. Voting partner or not? are they expected to post? should their posts be limited? etc. I personally like Ace's stricter inactivity guidelines too i.e. post every 24 hours. Although that's a lot harder to enforce.