BC and RoL: Salem Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On November 29 2010 12:22 annul wrote: ;D ... ;D that said, the other, more probable alternative way this could fuck town over (other than him being godfather i mean) is that he is actually mafia and his "DT" is either another mafia player and/or doesnt exist. in a game like this with only 1 mafia team, sacrificing 1 member for completely fucking the town circle is a good play, especially if he can get a few other blues out of the deal. this was bad in haunted because the red teams wanted to kill the other red team and NOT the town, but here with only 1 red team and their target the town, those blues will fall pretty quickly to a play like that. Please do tell how this is more probable? I do agree that there is a chance but the most probable? DT checks DrH's identity and then reveals his identity. How is it a sensible strategy to then put two mafia members at risk for a town circle that no one trusts at this point? As well, there are no other DT mouthpieces at this point to counterclaim which would've been perfectly sensible to do after I claimed to be a DT mouthpiece seeing as how its unlikely that there would be 3 DTs in a game of this size. I never said I needed the identity of DrH's medic either. So what? I get 1 potential blue out of this whole ordeal for 2 reds at the end? | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
EBWODP | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On November 27 2010 08:07 Glasse wrote: hi, don't waste a blue role on me, not worth it. (medic, dt, other stuff we have) meatshield represent. Seriously, what on earth is this? It's not like you really took it back the next post either? I realize that people have PMs on this and if there is anything useful in them such as motives or intents feel free to share them. On November 28 2010 06:53 Glasse wrote: wow pming drh is a bad thing i guess he just posts everything rofl Why would posting information publicly be bad? Assuming that you're not revealing your role or anything too important, you'd really have nothing to be afraid of regardless of who is posting it unless you have something to hide which you don't. You're green right? On November 28 2010 09:43 Glasse wrote: yea now that i actually read them that's kinda true :3 Just catching his mistake or scumslip. On November 30 2010 23:17 Glasse wrote: Alright i can't be on for the rest of the vote ends so i'm going to vote myself due to me thinking kenpachi is town and he's an easy bandwagon for scum. I'll try to be more active in the future, lots of work to do at college these days. If you were fully aware that you were going to be inactive for the rest of the vote, why not give reasons for why you are suspicious of certain other people instead of effectively abstaining by voting yourself? Aside from the PMs which I should probably ask DrH about in PMland, there's been nothing but early game spam, an immediate (and pointless) green claim that really suits no purpose but to distance yourself from the discussion and a potential scumslip. Now I know he might not be on to defend but it seems that he has a failed attempt to clear himself from suspicion, disregards any town discussion but posts semi-regularily to avoid being one of the inactive lynch candidates. In a slow game like this, the best way to hide as mafia is to not discuss anything important. Alot of the scum are in hiding this game and Glasse stands out as scum who's made an early game slipup. To me, he is a better lynch candidate than Kenpachi and so I'm voting him. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On December 01 2010 12:04 jcarlsoniv wrote: If this can be confirmed by South, that would be lovely. So at least you are being kept in check by them. How do you feel about a mass claim Doc? I don't quite understand what needs to be confirmed but yeah I was dt checked N1 and DocH has been sharing his info with me. (Be back in about 8 hours TT.TT) | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
On December 03 2010 04:16 Kavdragon wrote: Durp. Radfield has only really spent his time defending himself, and has continued to not post anything of benefit to the town. I was supportive of lynching inactives during the very beginning of this game but as I have realized, "inactive" describes half of the town. At this point we've had quite a few replacements as well which results in a very slim amount of people actually having a decent-sized post count (without even considering benefical posts) barring spam. While inactive may be unhelpful to town, I suspect that there are about 3 mafia hiding within the inactive pool while the others are either defending themselves right now or sheeping along. Ideally we want to find the active mafia, get the town involved in discussion thereby reducing the number of inactives and providing material for analysis, and rinse and repeat until victory. While I'm not saying that your judgement is incorrect, I'd rather search for mafia-esque behaviour rather than lack of town behaviour now. My apologies for using "inactive player" and "player who fails to contribute anything useful" interchangeably. | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
![]() | ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
SouthRawrea
Canada608 Posts
| ||
| ||