|
On October 31 2010 02:01 ghrur wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 01:57 kitaman27 wrote:On October 31 2010 01:52 ghrur wrote:
Why do I feel ignored? T_T At this time, I would like to declare my intentions to vote for the noble candidate ghrur. As much as I appreciate this, I really think I shouldn't be. I mean, I threw my name in because I feel like I'm able to keep my calm, but now that I look over it, I'm not active enough. I also really gain nothing from bodyguards as I can do this as a townie. Also, I feel that my role isn't strong enough. Instead, I really want to hear Glasse's platform once again.
Lol i don't really want to be mayor i just like having fun :D
Its my second mafia game, i can't be as active as others.
However i can prove that i'm town easily.
All depends if you want the possibility of a mafia mayor or not :O
|
On October 31 2010 02:19 ghrur wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 02:02 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 02:01 ghrur wrote:On October 31 2010 01:57 kitaman27 wrote:On October 31 2010 01:52 ghrur wrote:
Why do I feel ignored? T_T At this time, I would like to declare my intentions to vote for the noble candidate ghrur. As much as I appreciate this, I really think I shouldn't be. I mean, I threw my name in because I feel like I'm able to keep my calm, but now that I look over it, I'm not active enough. I also really gain nothing from bodyguards as I can do this as a townie. Also, I feel that my role isn't strong enough. Instead, I really want to hear Glasse's platform once again. Lol i don't really want to be mayor i just like having fun :D Its my second mafia game, i can't be as active as others. However i can prove that i'm town easily. All depends if you want the possibility of a mafia mayor or not :O I think we would all like to eliminate the possibility of a mafia mayor. We just want to know who has the best "way" to prove it with as little reasonable loop holes as possible. And thanks Kita, lol. xD
well i'm fairly sure i have the best way. i could prove it on day 2 :S
|
|
|
I made a list with what i think people are.
+ Show Spoiler +
1. DoctorHelvetica
2. Hyperbola
3. Bumatlarge
4. Veldril
5. Pandain
6. Aeres
7. deconduo
8. Coagulation
9. annul
10. infundibulum
11. Amber[LighT]
12. Kenpachi
13. lol1221
14. Nemesis
15. ghrur
16. KtheZ
17. QuickStriker
18. CubEdIn
19. Meapak_Ziphh
20. SiNiquity
21. DCLXVI
22. Divinek
23. Lexpar
24. ShmotZ
25. Orgolove
26. Node
27. youngminii
28. jcarlsoniv
29. BrownBear
30. Infinitestory
31. Masq
32. NB
33. Glasse
34 Misder
35. kingjames01
36. Ace
37. Fishball
38. kitaman27
39. LunarDestiny
|
On October 31 2010 05:55 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 05:50 Glasse wrote:I made a list with what i think people are. + Show Spoiler +
1. DoctorHelvetica
2. Hyperbola
3. Bumatlarge
4. Veldril
5. Pandain
6. Aeres
7. deconduo
8. Coagulation
9. annul
10. infundibulum
11. Amber[LighT]
12. Kenpachi
13. lol1221
14. Nemesis
15. ghrur
16. KtheZ
17. QuickStriker
18. CubEdIn
19. Meapak_Ziphh
20. SiNiquity
21. DCLXVI
22. Divinek
23. Lexpar
24. ShmotZ
25. Orgolove
26. Node
27. youngminii
28. jcarlsoniv
29. BrownBear
30. Infinitestory
31. Masq
32. NB
33. Glasse
34 Misder
35. kingjames01
36. Ace
37. Fishball
38. kitaman27
39. LunarDestiny
your posting is funny and cute but honestly at this point you are shitting up the thread. I'm requesting that you please stop, no one wants to wade through a bunch of your spam and god forbid someone take your current nonsense seriously.
So I can't play this game how i want to play it anymore? Not everyone's post need to 10 page long analysis on random posts. I don't feel the need to post my analysis out in the open and give reds time to react and make up more shit. If something really important comes up you'll know.
Also, hopefully someone takes my nonsense seriously, i am serious cat and this is a serious election.
Glasse 2010
On October 31 2010 05:53 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 05:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On October 31 2010 05:30 jcarlsoniv wrote:One thing I want to point out: On October 31 2010 05:01 Kenpachi wrote:
##Elect DoctorHelvetica From voting thread. Kenpachi has not posted once since the game started. Let's keep a closer eye on lurkers than we did in Haunted. I started a list of lurkers but it's as home, if a list isn't posted by 8 or so tonigh when I get home I'll post mine. Another quick reason why to vote for doc, he's already stated his day one lynch would be youngminii who so far has been the scummiest player. I no longer feel youngminii is the scummiest. In fact I would like to hear from every townie who their #1 suspect is of scum, if they have one at all. I would like to hear other peoples opinions. There has been a lot of campaign shitflinging and very little scumhunting of any sort. I don't think the mafia feel very pressured right now.
You are my #1 scum suspect.
|
need to be 10 pages long*
|
On October 31 2010 06:08 infinitestory wrote:
TBH I'm more interested in pressuring them into talking than actually pointing FoS at them.
not the smartest thing to say imo :3
|
On October 31 2010 06:14 infinitestory wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:08 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:08 infinitestory wrote:
TBH I'm more interested in pressuring them into talking than actually pointing FoS at them. not the smartest thing to say imo :3 In Mafia XXXI, we had a huge number of people either: 1) posting but without real content 2) posting hardly at all which hindered proper analysis. Like jcarlsoniv said, we need to keep a much better eye on lurkers. I'm not sure why you think that's not smart. also, 1) posting but without real contentthis is a hint
....
ok i'll stop posting. i'll post whenever i die to say bai.
just answering this though:
so saying that you want to pressure em into posting is smart?
just saying what he said before that sentence was enough, this just meant "hey, please post now, i'll read your post 100 times to see if i can find information in it"
|
On October 31 2010 06:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:22 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:14 infinitestory wrote:On October 31 2010 06:08 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:08 infinitestory wrote:
TBH I'm more interested in pressuring them into talking than actually pointing FoS at them. not the smartest thing to say imo :3 In Mafia XXXI, we had a huge number of people either: 1) posting but without real content 2) posting hardly at all which hindered proper analysis. Like jcarlsoniv said, we need to keep a much better eye on lurkers. I'm not sure why you think that's not smart. also, 1) posting but without real contentthis is a hint .... ok i'll stop posting. i'll post whenever i die to say bai. just answering this though: so saying that you want to pressure em into posting is smart? just saying what he said before that sentence was enough, this just meant "hey, please post now, i'll read your post 100 times to see if i can find information in it" versus letting them lurk and having mafia slip through the cracks of inactivity, yes it is smart. a mafia under no pressure can sit back and watch town kill eachother, it's ideal.
wtf is wrong with you, i facepalmed
saying the part of your plan that should stay in your head out in the open is stupid
fuck
sorry couldn't hold it
|
On October 31 2010 06:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:29 Fishball wrote:
We've had similar roles in previous games before. Basically a role that gets an extra vote, and would show up anonymously as "elder".
To be quite bold, I don't like the band wagon you're getting. There are quite a few players that have voted for you, I consider "suspicious" in my books. My only defense is that the last time I was a scum mayor I specifically ordered the mafia to create a "close win" and have me win by 1 or 2 votes. Doubtlessly there are mafia in this bandwagon though. Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:27 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 31 2010 06:22 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:14 infinitestory wrote:On October 31 2010 06:08 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:08 infinitestory wrote:
TBH I'm more interested in pressuring them into talking than actually pointing FoS at them. not the smartest thing to say imo :3 In Mafia XXXI, we had a huge number of people either: 1) posting but without real content 2) posting hardly at all which hindered proper analysis. Like jcarlsoniv said, we need to keep a much better eye on lurkers. I'm not sure why you think that's not smart. also, 1) posting but without real contentthis is a hint .... ok i'll stop posting. i'll post whenever i die to say bai. just answering this though: so saying that you want to pressure em into posting is smart? just saying what he said before that sentence was enough, this just meant "hey, please post now, i'll read your post 100 times to see if i can find information in it" versus letting them lurk and having mafia slip through the cracks of inactivity, yes it is smart. a mafia under no pressure can sit back and watch town kill eachother, it's ideal. wtf is wrong with you, i facepalmed saying the part of your plan that should stay in your head out in the open is stupid fuck sorry couldn't hold it What are you talking about? Why is it bad to pressure/force inactives to post? Why would we want people to just stay inactive and get away with it when mafia can just hide amongsts them and never get pressured...
Its not! but the "TBH I'm more interested in pressuring them into talking than actually pointing FoS at them." was not needed and may have fucked up his plan. Just suspecting them and saying it was because they were lurking and stuff was enough to make em talk.
|
On October 31 2010 06:34 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Glasse you are playing this game extremely different than Haunted Mafia in which you are a town aligned blue role. In that game you were very helpful and honest about what you were doing. Now you are antagonistic, refuse to explain anything about what you say, and have taken the mind boggling position that town shouldn't pressure inactives.
What is up with that?
It was my first game, i can't try something different? I was planning on being the same but that's no fun for me :3.
Unfortunately it looks like you are going to win the election... which could mean that if you think i'm red you will lynch me(I think thats how it works). This is also not fun.
I think playing the random/stupid/troll player is fun.
Btw, changing the way I play is a way to make you and others unable to analyse my playstyle like you are trying to do right now.
I'm pretty sure through my whole "shitting the thread up" part i've been honest, probably not as helpful though, but not having clues is part of that, if you go read my posts back there its mostly about clues  I loved to analyse profiles and stuff.
Also i did not say town should not pressure inactive, you just don't get what i'm trying to explain :3
|
On October 31 2010 06:43 infinitestory wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:38 Aeres wrote:On October 31 2010 06:28 infinitestory wrote:On October 31 2010 06:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 31 2010 04:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
1.5 hours to go
Doctorhelvetica: 12
Doctorhelvetica
LunarDestiny
Aeres
jcarlsoniv
Node
SiNiquity
Meapak_Ziphh
Veldril
CubEdIn
Amber[LighT]
Kenpachi
Elder vote
Bumatlarge: 6
Bumatlarge
Ace
Lexpar
Divinek
deconduo
infundibulum
Fishball: 5
youngminii
orgolove
Fishball
Misder
KtheZ
Pandain: 3
Nemesis
Coagulation
Pandain
Brownbear: 1
Brownbear
DCLXVI: 1
DCLXVI
kingjames01: 1
kingjames01
annul: 1
annul
kitaman27: 1
kitaman27
Glasse: 1
Glasse
infinitestory: 1
infinitestory
ghrur: 1
ghrur
NB: 1
NB
Not voted yet: 5
Hyperbola, lol1221, QuickStriker, ShmotZ, Masq hey yo what the fuck is an elder vote guys bet it's a special role which gets 1 extra vote (since there are only 11 people voting for you) You must have miscounted. Including this "Elder" fellow, there are 12 votes for the Doc. So, maybe the role you're talking about has been nerfed for this game, or has some other power in conjunction with vote anonymity. fuck i assumed it meant that one person in the list gets an extra vote, which is listed as "Elder"
I was reading a bunch of roles on mafiascum wiki and i saw something interesting. The "elder" could be only able to vote on 1 target, but give 2 votes. which means one of the voters has 2 votes.
Now look at the first vote count where elder wasnt and the vote count where vote is. Now this could have been a PM he held off until now but it could also be someone that was just added and counted as 2
People added to his list that could have 2 votes :
SiNiquity
Meapak_Ziphh
Veldril
CubEdIn
Amber[LighT]
Kenpachi
|
On October 31 2010 07:08 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Artanis told me he would like my top 3 candidates rather than my 1st. There are situations in which my top candidate may not be lynched and he would have to default to second choice.
I think this would be information I should share with the town.
so a role that can't be lynched hmm...
if this is true then there is probably a tree stump as well, who can't die or vote after he roleclaims
|
On October 31 2010 07:10 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 06:50 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 06:43 infinitestory wrote:On October 31 2010 06:38 Aeres wrote:On October 31 2010 06:28 infinitestory wrote:On October 31 2010 06:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 31 2010 04:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
1.5 hours to go
Doctorhelvetica: 12
Doctorhelvetica
LunarDestiny
Aeres
jcarlsoniv
Node
SiNiquity
Meapak_Ziphh
Veldril
CubEdIn
Amber[LighT]
Kenpachi
Elder vote
Bumatlarge: 6
Bumatlarge
Ace
Lexpar
Divinek
deconduo
infundibulum
Fishball: 5
youngminii
orgolove
Fishball
Misder
KtheZ
Pandain: 3
Nemesis
Coagulation
Pandain
Brownbear: 1
Brownbear
DCLXVI: 1
DCLXVI
kingjames01: 1
kingjames01
annul: 1
annul
kitaman27: 1
kitaman27
Glasse: 1
Glasse
infinitestory: 1
infinitestory
ghrur: 1
ghrur
NB: 1
NB
Not voted yet: 5
Hyperbola, lol1221, QuickStriker, ShmotZ, Masq hey yo what the fuck is an elder vote guys bet it's a special role which gets 1 extra vote (since there are only 11 people voting for you) You must have miscounted. Including this "Elder" fellow, there are 12 votes for the Doc. So, maybe the role you're talking about has been nerfed for this game, or has some other power in conjunction with vote anonymity. fuck i assumed it meant that one person in the list gets an extra vote, which is listed as "Elder" I was reading a bunch of roles on mafiascum wiki and i saw something interesting. The "elder" could be only able to vote on 1 target, but give 2 votes. which means one of the voters has 2 votes. Now look at the first vote count where elder wasnt and the vote count where vote is. Now this could have been a PM he held off until now but it could also be someone that was just added and counted as 2 People added to his list that could have 2 votes : SiNiquity Meapak_Ziphh Veldril CubEdIn Amber[LighT] Kenpachi This is interesting. It's sort of like a mini-Mayor without the protection, and with some privacy? Would the two votes have to be for the same person? Or could it possibly be someone who voted elsewhere, but then secretly voted for Dr.H so people don't know that's where he really wants his vote? I wonder what other applications it has, it sounds like it's just useful for helping rig elections. Additionally, do you think it's coupled with another power, or a standalone role?
I think having 2 votes is a big power and probably don't have another action. They could, however, be able to vote for someone else for their second vote.
|
Sorry i am catching up on reading, im at page 50 and i'm seeing pms between fishball and orgolove. I thought pms were not allowed either shouldnt fishball get modkilled as well?
+ Show Spoiler +
PMs:
PMs are not allowed this game unless you are PMing me or LSB, have explicit approval to PM or you are mafia, and then you may only PM your fellow mafia. I think PMs are too OP for town, so most things will happen in the thread this game. Always send in your PM actions to both LSB and myself or they might not be used.
|
On October 31 2010 11:17 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 11:16 Glasse wrote:Sorry i am catching up on reading, im at page 50 and i'm seeing pms between fishball and orgolove. I thought pms were not allowed either shouldnt fishball get modkilled as well? + Show Spoiler +
PMs:
PMs are not allowed this game unless you are PMing me or LSB, have explicit approval to PM or you are mafia, and then you may only PM your fellow mafia. I think PMs are too OP for town, so most things will happen in the thread this game. Always send in your PM actions to both LSB and myself or they might not be used.
Apparently fish, orglove and 4 other people are members of a neutral circle. But how did you get through 50 pages without hearing about that? :p
i only read quickly through the first 25 pages since i joined late, probably missed it
|
On October 31 2010 11:33 Nemesis wrote:
Do bodyguards protect the mayor from ALL hit or one hit each
from what i understood the mayor can't be hit at all until mafia finds and kill the bodyguard
|
i feel like this is directed at me
:3
|
On October 31 2010 12:24 Qatol wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 11:33 Glasse wrote:On October 31 2010 11:33 Nemesis wrote:
Do bodyguards protect the mayor from ALL hit or one hit each from what i understood the mayor can't be hit at all until mafia finds and kill the bodyguard This is not quite correct. If the bodyguard takes a hit (and dies) the same night as the mayor takes a hit, both will die (assuming the mayor doesn't survive because of a medic protection/veteran extra life/ etc).
well what i said is still true though, if the bodyguard is dead obviously the mayor can die 
|
i guess i should of said die instead of hit in my first post, its what i meant anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://208.116.9.205/10/content/14517/1.jpg)
