Haunted Mafia - Page 4

On October 14 2010 14:22 aztrorisk wrote:


hehe, how are you so sure? If you don't like it, just ignore it.

On October 14 2010 14:27 aztrorisk wrote:


maybe you'll see my importance when I die and their happens to a pumpkin at your door?

On October 14 2010 14:36 KhrisKruel wrote:


you mean a day 1 shit fest in which scum got lynched? Yeah clue speculation doesn't work at all.

Unless you are a vampire of course. That didn't go well for vamps at all.

On October 14 2010 19:42 KhrisKruel wrote:
I want to put my two cents in about blue roles.

Firstly, if you have a blue role, for the love of god don't claim unless you have a good reason. Don't even hint at them. You are giving the scum more information to easily make their nightkills.

Secondly, don't discuss what blue roles need to do. NB did this during day 1, and he was the mafia godfather. Blue roles will do what blue roles do, and they will give us information when they want us to.

Thirdly, don't claim to people in PM's. Don't listen to them when they say others have already claimed. You have no idea if they are townie or not, and knowing who you are you will die and the town will lose a blue role.

If that person tries to gain your trust by showing you a PM of them from DrH, they're cheating. They can tell you any role they have. All role PMs are public. Also, we were given two role pms, one of which has been changed. How do you know he isn't showing you the one given before?

As a rule, people discussing blue actions and asking people to PM them are never trustworthy. I hope the newbies to mafia don't fall into this. If you are a blue role, do what you think is best and don't listen to what anyone else tells you. Don't play WIFOM games of "well if we talk abou tit, then it won't happen." Just do what you believe is best. Don't worry about failing. Failing would be letting the mafia influence your night action for their benefit.

As a rule I'm highly suspicious of anyone discussing blue actions publicly.

On October 14 2010 12:24 KhrisKruel wrote:
how someone plays a game is not a reason to vote for them, even if they're annoying. Any green/blue lynches are bad for the town.

Voting for information is stupid too.

On October 15 2010 00:26 CubEdIn wrote:


Yes, it -somewhat- explains the number of messages, but then again, it's the kind of thing a red would do. Pick-up clues.
Also, the thing that urges me on is DrH's reaction to BM's threat. It's not damning, but it's sure suspicious. I explained why. He's not off my radar.

And thirdly, does't it strike you as odd that all but one kills were on target?
I mean sure, M/V have more information, but this was A LOT of information. Basically, only one or two of the kills tonight even came up in our suspects list, how did the others know who to go for?
I'm intrigued.

On October 15 2010 06:55 CubEdIn wrote:
Cool, I'm being suspected, makes me feel important!

Anyway, you can check, this is my first game, so I didn't really think that NOT voting for Veldril on the first hour of day 2 would somewhat incriminate me. I guess it makes sense, since it does seem that I tried to cast blame OFF Veldril TO Masq (and I did, lol), but it was also fairly obvious back then that Veldril would die if Masq is mafia.

This is reflected in today's votes, but me voting for him as well (now that I've been accused) will only look like an attempt to cover my tracks. I probably WILL end up voting for him anyway, since nobody else seems close to being more of a positive match, but since he's already heavily under the gun, I don't think my vote in particular would cause more pressure (he's currently top voted with 10 votes vs 2 votes for the next candidate).

However, my biggest problem as of now, is not who to vote for, since I already have Veldril to aim for, but who ELSE is a suspect.

Think about it, on day one we had masq, and then a shitstorm of posts that incriminated a lot of people (and if you don't believe that they did, take a look at the kill count in night 1). I, frankly, didn't catch those "hints" which has me worried.

If Mafia/Vamp managed to aim correctly since night one, then those hints were there, for sure. Why did we not see them as well? What are we not seeing now?

I need to go through all this thread again but I don't have time right now, and it's only getting bigger. After that (prolly in about 12h or so), I'll set my vote.
Frankly, I think that I'll end up voting for Veldril anyway, but I'm not convinced that he's Vamp just yet, I was way, way more "sure" of masq.
Downside is that, apart from him, everyone else is just a blur.

On October 16 2010 14:20 Coagulation wrote:



this looks like our best bet now if we dont get any major implications from night post.