|
On August 09 2010 14:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Yeah, I'm changing it up this game. Last game I posted a lot and got dragged into arguments and lines of thinking that ultimately didn't help the town and ended up being frustrated with myself. Since I have less time right now anyway, i'm taking a more laid back approach to this game and trying to think more analytically than emotionally. I'm sure you're not the only one to have noticed. That said I did some thinking and depending on what the tracker found, Xelin could be a confirmed innocent. Essentially, Xelin being framed to appear red doesn't matter - if Xelin is mafia and was tracked, the tracker will know that Xelin visited someone on today's kill list and ergo that he is mafia. If Xelin didn't visit anybody, then he's not mafia even if he was framed. So I don't think we need to worry about lynching Xelin. Exceptions: Xelin is Principal or Ninja, in such cases my previous logic does not apply since those roles can't be tracked. So basically this actually works out pretty well in that we have only 2 townies dead and 2 quasi-confirmed townies in Xelin and Foolishness.
Yeah too bad the tracker appears to be Chezinu and he appears to have tracked Papa Smurf.
|
he's the tracker?
why you guys believe anything that guy types is beyond me.
|
On August 09 2010 14:43 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:26 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 14:24 DarthThienAn wrote:On August 09 2010 14:08 youngminii wrote:
Why are we voting Divinek?
If we're gonna vote for someone completely random with no plan and no hard evidence I suggest foolishness. If he really is Vet, well he's lost his usefulness since he already soaked up a hit but I think he's scum trying to look active and pointing fingers everywhere. Obviously I have no evidence so if people want to vote someone else, be my guest but there's as much chance that foolishness is scum as Divinek/BM being scum.
Better get rid of foolishness now if he really is fake claiming then trust him later (assuming he is scum). Are you kidding me? If he really is vet, then he is a confirmed townie. How is that useless? On August 09 2010 14:14 Bill Murray wrote:On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? youngminii: already been said. I plan on doing an indepth analysis tomorrow (I really need to go sleep shortly >.<) Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Chezinu: Fits the bill with youngminii (notice how youngminii is protective of Chezinu during day 1). Also I don't think you're mafia, Pyrry's not mafia, I'm not mafia, which leaves Chezinu as top candidate for balancing purposes. Infundibulum also fits for balancing since he's one of the most experienced players in this game as well. Weeding through the inactives/lurkers is a tiring and troublesome process. This gives me townie cred with you I wish people would be more open with their roles, though. I'll be back in an hour or so. So that you can hit more accurately tonight? ^^ Didn't you read his posts? I've used up my extra life so I got nothing else to live for. Forget about establishing town circles and the what not...I've lost my extra life. Therefore I am useless. So perhaps we can lynch you to confirm this?
:/ is this now a joke game? Here's the deal.
1. Lynch some more inactive person like oh gee i dont know
Artanis[Xp]
KF91
Pandain
Amber[LighT]
iNfuNdiBuLuM
Roffles
larjarse
SouthRawrea
BrownBear
Forgive me if they have been active but i havent seen to much of them.
2. If you really want to accuse someone, do it with one simple post. Bold their name at the top and then analyze all you want. Mafia like nothing more then when EVERY SINGLE PERSON point to the person next to them. Honestly who hasnt been accused of being a "certain scum"
Just calm down, and present your argument CLEARLY. We can then democraticly discuss this and vote on a proper lynch victim.
3. We have information hopefully that mafia doesnt have. If you are a well informed town keep it to yourself unless someone is confirmed. I.E. We kill the GF, because no one is confirmed until that person is dead. Include that in your gigantic analyzing also.
Thank for riding Bum airlines.
|
On August 09 2010 14:54 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:43 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On August 09 2010 14:26 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 14:24 DarthThienAn wrote:On August 09 2010 14:08 youngminii wrote:
Why are we voting Divinek?
If we're gonna vote for someone completely random with no plan and no hard evidence I suggest foolishness. If he really is Vet, well he's lost his usefulness since he already soaked up a hit but I think he's scum trying to look active and pointing fingers everywhere. Obviously I have no evidence so if people want to vote someone else, be my guest but there's as much chance that foolishness is scum as Divinek/BM being scum.
Better get rid of foolishness now if he really is fake claiming then trust him later (assuming he is scum). Are you kidding me? If he really is vet, then he is a confirmed townie. How is that useless? On August 09 2010 14:14 Bill Murray wrote:On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? youngminii: already been said. I plan on doing an indepth analysis tomorrow (I really need to go sleep shortly >.<) Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Chezinu: Fits the bill with youngminii (notice how youngminii is protective of Chezinu during day 1). Also I don't think you're mafia, Pyrry's not mafia, I'm not mafia, which leaves Chezinu as top candidate for balancing purposes. Infundibulum also fits for balancing since he's one of the most experienced players in this game as well. Weeding through the inactives/lurkers is a tiring and troublesome process. This gives me townie cred with you I wish people would be more open with their roles, though. I'll be back in an hour or so. So that you can hit more accurately tonight? ^^ Didn't you read his posts? I've used up my extra life so I got nothing else to live for. Forget about establishing town circles and the what not...I've lost my extra life. Therefore I am useless. So perhaps we can lynch you to confirm this? :/ is this now a joke game? Here's the deal. 1. Lynch some more inactive person like oh gee i dont know Artanis[Xp] KF91 Pandain Amber[LighT] iNfuNdiBuLuM Roffles larjarse SouthRawrea BrownBear Forgive me if they have been active but i havent seen to much of them. 2. If you really want to accuse someone, do it with one simple post. Bold their name at the top and then analyze all you want. Mafia like nothing more then when EVERY SINGLE PERSON point to the person next to them. Honestly who hasnt been accused of being a "certain scum" Just calm down, and present your argument CLEARLY. We can then democraticly discuss this and vote on a proper lynch victim. 3. We have information hopefully that mafia doesnt have. If you are a well informed town keep it to yourself unless someone is confirmed. I.E. We kill the GF, because no one is confirmed until that person is dead. Include that in your gigantic analyzing also. Thank for riding Bum airlines.
Okay let's waste some more lynches on those inactives. Before you know it we'll be lylo, okay thanks but I'd rather not ride a plane that's going to crash and burn.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On August 09 2010 14:34 Divinek wrote:
On August 09 2010 14:29 youngminii wrote:
I don't understand how you guys can automatically assume he's a confirmed townie. I feel no "townie vibes" coming off him, his posts aren't hugely scummy but afaik he's a good player.
On August 09 2010 14:31 youngminii wrote:
##Vote Foolishness
cool story bro
|
ok inf decides to join the party, take a seat right over there, we can all use a little "changing it up this game"
I personally feel Chez is tracker, because hes not inhuman. He may be doing some scum stunt, but I think we can at least rely on him to do his job if he is tracker. Otherwise he is a free hit. So Chez if you would like to clear anything up, please do so. We can understand if you want to confuse mafia members luring them in to hit you, but Im sure you can give us an idea of what you are doing. Honestly if you said "I am a Tracker" they would still think twice about hitting you, even without buses and medics
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
My quote tags were being stupid, just wanted to repost that.
|
holy shit thread.
Too much shit to think about right now. Will read through and post later.
|
On August 09 2010 15:00 Foolishness wrote:
My quote tags were being stupid, just wanted to repost that.
why quote when you can spam image macros?
![[image loading]](http://www.youchewpoop.com/wiki/images/7/70/Cool_story_bro.jpg)
|
On August 09 2010 14:57 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:54 bumatlarge wrote:On August 09 2010 14:43 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On August 09 2010 14:26 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 14:24 DarthThienAn wrote:On August 09 2010 14:08 youngminii wrote:
Why are we voting Divinek?
If we're gonna vote for someone completely random with no plan and no hard evidence I suggest foolishness. If he really is Vet, well he's lost his usefulness since he already soaked up a hit but I think he's scum trying to look active and pointing fingers everywhere. Obviously I have no evidence so if people want to vote someone else, be my guest but there's as much chance that foolishness is scum as Divinek/BM being scum.
Better get rid of foolishness now if he really is fake claiming then trust him later (assuming he is scum). Are you kidding me? If he really is vet, then he is a confirmed townie. How is that useless? On August 09 2010 14:14 Bill Murray wrote:On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? youngminii: already been said. I plan on doing an indepth analysis tomorrow (I really need to go sleep shortly >.<) Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Chezinu: Fits the bill with youngminii (notice how youngminii is protective of Chezinu during day 1). Also I don't think you're mafia, Pyrry's not mafia, I'm not mafia, which leaves Chezinu as top candidate for balancing purposes. Infundibulum also fits for balancing since he's one of the most experienced players in this game as well. Weeding through the inactives/lurkers is a tiring and troublesome process. This gives me townie cred with you I wish people would be more open with their roles, though. I'll be back in an hour or so. So that you can hit more accurately tonight? ^^ Didn't you read his posts? I've used up my extra life so I got nothing else to live for. Forget about establishing town circles and the what not...I've lost my extra life. Therefore I am useless. So perhaps we can lynch you to confirm this? :/ is this now a joke game? Here's the deal. 1. Lynch some more inactive person like oh gee i dont know Artanis[Xp] KF91 Pandain Amber[LighT] iNfuNdiBuLuM Roffles larjarse SouthRawrea BrownBear Forgive me if they have been active but i havent seen to much of them. 2. If you really want to accuse someone, do it with one simple post. Bold their name at the top and then analyze all you want. Mafia like nothing more then when EVERY SINGLE PERSON point to the person next to them. Honestly who hasnt been accused of being a "certain scum" Just calm down, and present your argument CLEARLY. We can then democraticly discuss this and vote on a proper lynch victim. 3. We have information hopefully that mafia doesnt have. If you are a well informed town keep it to yourself unless someone is confirmed. I.E. We kill the GF, because no one is confirmed until that person is dead. Include that in your gigantic analyzing also. Thank for riding Bum airlines. Okay let's waste some more lynches on those inactives. Before you know it we'll be lylo, okay thanks but I'd rather not ride a plane that's going to crash and burn.
there are always mafia lurkers, always always. We have to force inactive people to post or how can we analyze their play
|
On August 09 2010 15:00 bumatlarge wrote:
ok inf decides to join the party, take a seat right over there, we can all use a little "changing it up this game"
I personally feel Chez is tracker, because hes not inhuman. He may be doing some scum stunt, but I think we can at least rely on him to do his job if he is tracker. Otherwise he is a free hit. So Chez if you would like to clear anything up, please do so. We can understand if you want to confuse mafia members luring them in to hit you, but Im sure you can give us an idea of what you are doing. Honestly if you said "I am a Tracker" they would still think twice about hitting you, even without buses and medics
wait where did I hear this before..
On July 04 2010 15:39 bumatlarge wrote:Ah dern it Chez could say I AM THE GF and some people still wouldnt lynch him.
You were totally right then and your totally right now. Without further a due. "I am The Tracker!" if there is more than one tracker, I am The Tracker and the other person is the "other tracker" or just "a tracker"
|
So then. We can assume Xelin is practically confirmed, yes yes? Foolishness, were you med protected or vet protected? Would be nice to know you and a med are in cahoots.
|
On August 08 2010 12:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Lol.
Wow...Thread explosion.
His only post since day 20. Lol. I didn't even know he was playing. Why isn't he on the inactive list above?
|
On August 09 2010 15:13 ~OpZ~ wrote:
So then. We can assume Xelin is practically confirmed, yes yes? Foolishness, were you med protected or vet protected? Would be nice to know you and a med are in cahoots.
Lmao. I point out you're missing and you show up. Sorry, bro.
|
On August 09 2010 15:13 ~OpZ~ wrote:
So then. We can assume Xelin is practically confirmed, yes yes? Foolishness, were you med protected or vet protected? Would be nice to know you and a med are in cahoots.
Actually that would suck because it would mean another blue ignored the plan.
Xelin is 0% confirmed because we have someone claiming tracker who claims to have tracked VayeshMoru instead of Xelin.
|
On August 09 2010 14:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Yeah, I'm changing it up this game. Last game I posted a lot and got dragged into arguments and lines of thinking that ultimately didn't help the town and ended up being frustrated with myself. Since I have less time right now anyway, i'm taking a more laid back approach to this game and trying to think more analytically than emotionally. I'm sure you're not the only one to have noticed. That said I did some thinking and depending on what the tracker found, Xelin could be a confirmed innocent. Essentially, Xelin being framed to appear red doesn't matter - if Xelin is mafia and was tracked, the tracker will know that Xelin visited someone on today's kill list and ergo that he is mafia. If Xelin didn't visit anybody, then he's not mafia even if he was framed. So I don't think we need to worry about lynching Xelin. Exceptions: Xelin is Principal or Ninja, in such cases my previous logic does not apply since those roles can't be tracked. So basically this actually works out pretty well in that we have only 2 townies dead and 2 quasi-confirmed townies in Xelin and Foolishness.
If a tracker speaks up, then we would all need to PM Xelin. Basically, tracker, whoever you tracked if they visited ANYONE and the person visited didn't die, you got us a confirmed townie. If they didn't visit anyone, you shouldn't pm them. GF, Ninja....Lil scary world out there.
But, Tracker, if you visited Xelin, and Xelin visited someone. And given the watcher watched Xelin....We should have one hell of a town circle. VARY NICE?!
So once Tracker posts that he followed Xelin...Should we mass claim to Xelin? We dont have the number of roles, BUT we can assume by balance....
|
On August 09 2010 15:13 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:His only post since day 20. Lol. I didn't even know he was playing. Why isn't he on the inactive list above?
I was already here. Check the post above yours.
Got a new job. Remember I was talking about it last game? Sorry bro. Been missing my ass? Hold on, I'll come shake it.
|
You are awesome chez, and my bad thought I saw OPZ post recently, I must be delusional.
|
On August 09 2010 15:18 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 15:13 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On August 08 2010 12:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Lol.
Wow...Thread explosion. His only post since day 20. Lol. I didn't even know he was playing. Why isn't he on the inactive list above? I was already here. Check the post above yours. Got a new job. Remember I was talking about it last game? Sorry bro. Been missing my ass? Hold on, I'll come shake it.
Wait. I take it back. You're retarded. THE POST YOU QUOTED WAS BEFORE YOU POINTED ME BEING MISSING.
-_-
If you're gonna point out I'm missing, can you do it before I post...Then brag about me just showing up AFTER you post, when in fact I posted BEFORE you even pointed it out.
|
On August 09 2010 15:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2010 14:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:On August 09 2010 13:52 Bill Murray wrote:
@foolishness: top 3 suspects and why? Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything. Yeah, I'm changing it up this game. Last game I posted a lot and got dragged into arguments and lines of thinking that ultimately didn't help the town and ended up being frustrated with myself. Since I have less time right now anyway, i'm taking a more laid back approach to this game and trying to think more analytically than emotionally. I'm sure you're not the only one to have noticed. That said I did some thinking and depending on what the tracker found, Xelin could be a confirmed innocent. Essentially, Xelin being framed to appear red doesn't matter - if Xelin is mafia and was tracked, the tracker will know that Xelin visited someone on today's kill list and ergo that he is mafia. If Xelin didn't visit anybody, then he's not mafia even if he was framed. So I don't think we need to worry about lynching Xelin. Exceptions: Xelin is Principal or Ninja, in such cases my previous logic does not apply since those roles can't be tracked. So basically this actually works out pretty well in that we have only 2 townies dead and 2 quasi-confirmed townies in Xelin and Foolishness. If a tracker speaks up, then we would all need to PM Xelin. Basically, tracker, whoever you tracked if they visited ANYONE and the person visited didn't die, you got us a confirmed townie. If they didn't visit anyone, you shouldn't pm them. GF, Ninja....Lil scary world out there. But, Tracker, if you visited Xelin, and Xelin visited someone. And given the watcher watched Xelin....We should have one hell of a town circle. VARY NICE?! So once Tracker posts that he followed Xelin...Should we mass claim to Xelin? We dont have the number of roles, BUT we can assume by balance....
Not sure if im following... You realize mafia might have framer and roleblocker, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
