|
On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote:
*Addition*
Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that?
He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too.
I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum.
|
On July 22 2010 11:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
There seems to be enough of us online to change votes. I'm fine with BC or Tree.Hugger dying. BC's too deadly, and Tree.Hugger...well...He defended Darth in a bull shit no information and false information way, and jumped on Subversion with shitty logic. That is all.
AND he PM'd me, which is a no no. I only want PM's when I'm checked and saved.
last minute wagons are both fun and whacky, though they can be harded to draw conclusions from if we're wong
|
@Princess Bride: But if he weren't immune, it would be wifom.
|
I am willing to put my reputation on the line for Tree.Hugger too.
Right now this means I've defended Tree.Hugger, Subversion and DTA. I'm quite confident that Tree.Hugger and Subversion are town whereas in DTA's case, I think it's likely that he's town although he could be playing sneakily and toying with me (unlikely)
|
On July 22 2010 11:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
There seems to be enough of us online to change votes. I'm fine with BC or Tree.Hugger dying. BC's too deadly, and Tree.Hugger...well...He defended Darth in a bull shit no information and false information way, and jumped on Subversion with shitty logic. That is all.
AND he PM'd me, which is a no no. I only want PM's when I'm checked and saved.
I don't think lynching either is smart. BC is dangerous but he's also dangerous if he's town-aligned. Since we have a decent idea of who is siding with who with today's discussion we should stick with our original suspects and go for either DTA or Subversion at this point. Causing a last minute bandwagon will ruin the last 20+ pages as we gain absolutely no new knowledge.
|
Totally sticking to chaoser.
|
Question: if I am town, who does that implicate?
|
On July 22 2010 11:28 DarthThienAn wrote:
Question: if I am town, who does that implicate?
Subversion asked the same question. I don't get why we have to prove that we have more reds in our hands to vote for someone we think is red.
|
On July 22 2010 11:23 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote:
*Addition*
Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that?
He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too. I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum.
Why would you think this makes him town aligned? All he is doing is putting forth a reason to vote me off. Me being town, this would be a pretty scum thing to do?
|
On July 22 2010 11:30 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:28 DarthThienAn wrote:
Question: if I am town, who does that implicate? Subversion asked the same question. I don't get why we have to prove that we have more reds in our hands to vote for someone we think is red.
More than one person has said, what happens if all three of us is town?
|
8] DarthThienAn (~opz~, d3_crescentia, Pyrrhuloxia, XeliN, zeks, Subversion, LaXerCannon, rastaban)
6] Subversion (tree.hugger, bumatlarge, jayme, Amber[LighT], chaoser, DarthThienAn)
7] chaoser (SiNiquity, youngminii, Roffles, SouthRawrEa, misder, citi.zen, BrownBear)
1] Brownbear (tricode, )
2] Amber[LighT] (BloodyC0bbler, Divinek)
Abstain: (, Protactinium, Infundibulum,Pandain, lakrismamma)
been a few pages since an update this is how it stands im pretty pretty sure
|
On July 22 2010 11:31 Subversion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:23 youngminii wrote:On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote:
*Addition*
Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that?
He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too. I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum. Why would you think this makes him town aligned? All he is doing is putting forth a reason to vote me off. Me being town, this would be a pretty scum thing to do?
No
|
It is not scum like to put my reputation linked to Subversion's flip.
|
On July 22 2010 11:35 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:31 Subversion wrote:On July 22 2010 11:23 youngminii wrote:On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote:
*Addition*
Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that?
He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too. I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum. Why would you think this makes him town aligned? All he is doing is putting forth a reason to vote me off. Me being town, this would be a pretty scum thing to do? No
Errr... elaborate?
|
I don't like how this situation is playing out...the votes are so close, Mafia should be able to save their own if they wanted to if one of their own was in trouble. But they're not. What does this mean...
|
On July 22 2010 10:41 SouthRawrea wrote:
Edit: Removed because what I wrote made no sense.
.........................................what did you edit
|
SouthRawrea, this is your 1 warning. Ask me if you want to edit something.
|
SouthRawr, it is against the rules of any online mafia game to edit your posts.
|
Day ends in an hour and 20
|
On July 22 2010 11:39 chaoser wrote:
I don't like how this situation is playing out...the votes are so close, Mafia should be able to save their own if they wanted to if one of their own was in trouble. But they're not. What does this mean...
If you flip red, it means there are loads of mafia in DTA/Subversion's bandwagons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
