TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 5

On July 23 2010 11:13 Pandain wrote:


How do you know it was a PM?

Maybe I'm a psychotic liar.

Didn't think about that, did you?

On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote:

If you would read the thread once in a while, you would've read my reasoning earlier. It's okay, I'm kind enough to explain it again.

There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense.

Anyway, what's wrong with you people. You lynch DTA and say 'we fucked up' and 'we didn't learn anything'? I'll come back when I have some free time and lay down a solid argument against chaoser. Until then, have fun.

On July 23 2010 12:37 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
? am i just misreading it? how is what he said an answer for "why don't you think tree.hugger is red, given all the sketchy shit you say he's doing?"

On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote:
so excited to see who died.

even tho i really think it might be me, lolz.

On July 23 2010 13:07 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
Or, youngminii, you could answer the question and clarify your position for the rest of the town.

As it is right now, you are

1) dodging the question
2) becoming hostile

I was not hostile - the post you made about tree huggers PM's is actually pretty important and I didn't really follow your thought process. You obviously know a lot about tree hugger, yet you are refusing to share this information with the town. Why? I looked back in the thread and didn't see the clarifying post you mentioned before.

I don't understand why you're so uncooperative. Like I said, if i was in your position, i would be thinking pretty hard about tree hugger being scum, especially since he'd been pushing for Subversions lynch over chaoser - someone who you thought (think) was red. But you don't think he's scum. I asked why, a reasonable question, and you haven't answered.

Why are you dodging the questions?

On July 23 2010 13:10 Pandain wrote:


He did partially answer the question. He said if Subversion was scum, than Tree.Hugger wouldn't be lynching him. However that does leave off the question if he thought subversion wasn't scum.

Youngmini can explain himself better than I just did, but you get the point.

Also, I'm highly suscipious especially of Chaoser because it seems to me that as soon as day started, youngmini started getting hammered. Lay off, I don't want this to become another bandwagon. Let him explain.

On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:

I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2.

Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks.

On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote:
so excited to see who died.

even tho i really think it might be me, lolz.

On July 23 2010 13:37 youngminii wrote:
That's so dumb holy fucking Christ. Apologies for the mess I made.

Anyway, back to chaoser. Why are you bringing up subversion?



I don't see what this has to do with anything we were talking about. Subversion's scumness doesn't have a thing to do with what I said previously.

On July 23 2010 13:51 Pandain wrote:
Now that things have settled, I think now would be a good time for everyone who hasn't voted to double lynch to do so now. I really feel like we should've had it for this day, but I guess we'll have to wait.

Opinions? Anyone see why we SHOULDN'T double lynch? If not, I urge all of you to vote so now.

On July 23 2010 14:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


We know we have two kp roles, one is a vig, the other could be hatter or vig.

On July 23 2010 15:36 SiNiquity wrote:


If BC is lying, then there were only 2 hits last night. If there were only 2 hits last night, then no Vigilante fired a shot (unless Mafia stacked, but this seems highly unlikely). Therefore when we call for a Vigilante to claim, some Mafia could claim it worry-free, since no one else could claim it. Worse yet, this Mafia member that claimed could be Godfather and have picked the Vigilante role, so there's no way to know there either (or BC is GF under the guise of a Veteran).

Thus both the claiming Vigilante and BC would need to be checked. If neither were Mafia, only then would we know for sure.