|
On July 24 2010 02:16 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 02:11 rastaban wrote:On July 24 2010 02:03 citi.zen wrote:On July 24 2010 01:50 SiNiquity wrote:On July 24 2010 01:38 citi.zen wrote: It does confirm that either Tricode and BC are both red, or Triode is innocent. So it tells us more about Tricode than about BC at this time. True. Though if Tricode were Mafia, it would give us 2 Mafia members immediately, which would be a wealth of information for us. It would be one hell of a Mafia gamble to fake all of this, as they would have to bank on us not lynching Tricode. I don't know about killing tricode, it makes zero sense - he's almost confirmed and thus potentially very useful. I am wondering whether the two DTs can use tricode to coordinate between themselves. All he would do is pass them each other's name (or name of their contact). He would also have to keep his mouth shut to everyone else. If the two Dts were in contact somehow we'd be in fantastic shape. Comments? I like the idea, but just wanted to point out a couple caveats. 1. He isn't 100% confirmed it is risky. As of yet there is no evidence at all that the hit ever happened beyond both there words. While it is unlikely is it worth exposing both DTs to this possibility? 2. What if he gets a mafia claim? if the mafia claim fast then if 1 of the DTs isn't active he may go ahead and exchange the names. Even if all three go through would he then share them all, tell us who the three were? If the hit didn't even happen then we can assume both are mafia and that in general is a bad play by mafia, two public figures lying about roles. Either BC is mafia and lying or both are telling the truth. I think those are the only two real possibilities...right? More like a "very risky play for mafia". I view it as unlikely, but not impossible.
|
On July 24 2010 10:31 tree.hugger wrote: Hahahaha, BC where was that Day 1?
Also, I think we should lynch youngjeezy. He's like Subversion, (and tied to him) but more annoying. I think, seeing how he's rendered an opinion on practically everyone in the town by now, he's a lynch that'll keep on giving. I've thought he's mafia from the beginning, basically, and he's continued to get pretty much everything wrong since then.
But I guess I'm open to lynching citi.zen as well, as he's been spectacularly unhelpful, and has been sitting firmly in that grey area between activity and inactivity that usually harbors at least half of the mafia. Pop quiz: out of BC's list of himself, me or pyrr, who has been "hugging that green area" closest?
|
Ok, let's blow this taco stand.
I am a mad hatter. I am part of a dt circle. I would love to help the two dt's connect. Here's how we can do it:
1. Wait to see if there is a counter claim against me and Tricode, since together we should account for the 2 town Kp roles. If there isn't, we are both confirmed. If there is, we have a red player. 2. The other dt asks a confirmed person they checked to contact me. If more than one person comes forward I will ask the dt to claim. This way, if the mafia decide to fake claim we have two reds, not just one. 3. The two DTs, remaining publicly anonymous, are in contact. We give ourselves a chance to win.
|
On July 24 2010 12:05 citi.zen wrote: Ok, let's blow this taco stand.
I am a mad hatter. I am part of a dt circle. I would love to help the two dt's connect. Here's how we can do it:
1. Wait to see if there is a counter claim against me and Tricode, since together we should account for the 2 town Kp roles. If there isn't, we are both confirmed. If there is, we have a red player. 2. The other dt asks a confirmed person they checked to contact me. If more than one person comes forward I will ask the dt to claim. This way, if the mafia decide to fake claim we have two reds, not just one. 3. The two DTs, remaining publicly anonymous, are in contact. We give ourselves a chance to win. People like spam and I want this to be easy to find.
Also: if there is no counter-claim by tomorrow it would be wise for all blues to RC to me. Would a shame to lynch / investigate / bomb the wrong person. Thanks.
|
On July 24 2010 13:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 12:05 citi.zen wrote: Ok, let's blow this taco stand.
I am a mad hatter. I am part of a dt circle. I would love to help the two dt's connect. Here's how we can do it:
1. Wait to see if there is a counter claim against me and Tricode, since together we should account for the 2 town Kp roles. If there isn't, we are both confirmed. If there is, we have a red player. 2. The other dt asks a confirmed person they checked to contact me. If more than one person comes forward I will ask the dt to claim. This way, if the mafia decide to fake claim we have two reds, not just one. 3. The two DTs, remaining publicly anonymous, are in contact. We give ourselves a chance to win. Wait wait wait, what?
So not only do we have you claiming the second KP role, your claiming your in touch with a dt, that your confirmed, and are now requesting a player the other dt has confirmed to check in and ask the dt to claim..... So, someone starts to FoS you, you then claim amazing inner circle, and are asking the DT or if nothing else a confirmed townie to trust you 100%. The DT's in your plan stay anonymous, except are forced to claim to people they haven't verified opening up confirmed people to potentially die, and yourself an easy out if either of them die by accusing the other persons "confirmed" person as red. Now as much fun as this would be We have two town KP roles claiming today. neither of which are confirmed (counterclaims could disprove this but requires wasting dt checks, lynches, time, and opening up everything to a bomber). Seriously people read the post, he is asking for a way into a town circle a dt has begun without confirming himself in the least, this is shady shady play and citizen knows it. Then couple it with Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 12:57 citi.zen wrote:On July 24 2010 12:05 citi.zen wrote: Ok, let's blow this taco stand.
I am a mad hatter. I am part of a dt circle. I would love to help the two dt's connect. Here's how we can do it:
1. Wait to see if there is a counter claim against me and Tricode, since together we should account for the 2 town Kp roles. If there isn't, we are both confirmed. If there is, we have a red player. 2. The other dt asks a confirmed person they checked to contact me. If more than one person comes forward I will ask the dt to claim. This way, if the mafia decide to fake claim we have two reds, not just one. 3. The two DTs, remaining publicly anonymous, are in contact. We give ourselves a chance to win. People like spam and I want this to be easy to find. Also: if there is no counter-claim by tomorrow it would be wise for all blues to RC to me. Would a shame to lynch / investigate / bomb the wrong person. Thanks. And you not only have him requesting DT's hes requesting all blues to roleclaim him. NO ONE, should be roleclaiming someone unconfirmed asking for so much out of the blue for this. This is beyond the matter of a simple roleclaim, and is now potentially a game ender for whatever side citizen actually is. Public roleclaims are bad enough, adding in a complete grab for blues is even worse.
|
On July 24 2010 13:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 12:05 citi.zen wrote: Ok, let's blow this taco stand.
I am a mad hatter. I am part of a dt circle. I would love to help the two dt's connect. Here's how we can do it:
1. Wait to see if there is a counter claim against me and Tricode, since together we should account for the 2 town Kp roles. If there isn't, we are both confirmed. If there is, we have a red player. 2. The other dt asks a confirmed person they checked to contact me. If more than one person comes forward I will ask the dt to claim. This way, if the mafia decide to fake claim we have two reds, not just one. 3. The two DTs, remaining publicly anonymous, are in contact. We give ourselves a chance to win. Wait wait wait, what?
So not only do we have you claiming the second KP role, your claiming your in touch with a dt, that your confirmed, and are now requesting a player the other dt has confirmed to check in and ask the dt to claim.....
So, someone starts to FoS you, you then claim amazing inner circle, and are asking the DT or if nothing else a confirmed townie to trust you 100%. The DT's in your plan stay anonymous, except are forced to claim to people they haven't verified opening up confirmed people to potentially die, and yourself an easy out if either of them die by accusing the other persons "confirmed" person as red.
Now as much fun as this would be We have two town KP roles claiming today. neither of which are confirmed (counterclaims could disprove this but requires wasting dt checks, lynches, time, and opening up everything to a bomber). I never claimed to be "confirmed". I only stated that if nobody else counter-claims, I will be. You know this.
Also, curious who it is that "FOS-ed" me. You? Look at your list of suspects above. I don't see an analysis on myself. Tree.hugger? Look at who he voted for. Do you really think this would be enough for a mafia to come up with a risky plan which can only end in a counter-claim? I know you know better.
Seriously people read the post, he is asking for a way into a town circle a dt has begun without confirming himself in the least, this is shady shady play and citizen knows it.
I am actually going to have access to both town circles. Scary, isn't it?
Throughout this game I felt you did little more but offer boiler-plate "tactical" advice. Like your long post about the game set-up: interesting but useless, other than to try to shed some suspicion on me. Now you are trying to stop this without any solid counter-argument. You also placed yourself on a "to check" list day one, so I'd guess you know you'd pass. You make a compelling GF right now. So, unless I hear of a confirmd red from the other DT:
##vote BloodyC0bbler
|
On July 24 2010 14:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 14:25 Divinek wrote:On July 24 2010 14:18 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 24 2010 14:13 youngminii wrote: What's suspicious is that you're trying to block this from happening. Not pointing fingers but it's quite obvious that this is a pretty solid plan with minimal chances of being infiltrated by scum, even then it will be obvious as the game progresses if he's lying or not. From blocking it? I actually contest many claims in many games that are completely out of left field. No one agreed to claiming to someone who thought d3 was almost fully legit, yet your agreeing to claim to someone who has appeared out as the last KP role? as well as saying "sup im the medic spokesmen, got myself a circle already" etc... Its too good to be true this early. But surely if he's coming out as the last kp role it would have to be contested if he's lying? Though I could think of some reasons why the remaining kp person might not want to counter claim him it seems like it would be worth it to bust a fake circle of trust Say for instance He is lying.[blah... blah...] Stop right there. We will need a counter claim from your gang for that to be a possibility. Anytime now.
|
On July 24 2010 15:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Citizen, you know im criticizing you because what you proposed isn’t a solid plan.
You offered a plan that your “confirmation” was no counter claim. A dt has to prove he’s a DT after day 2 by handing over a red typically. A vig has to have wasted a shot and been willing to die (see tricode), a hatter would have to offer to sacrifice their-self. Instead you offered a plan that relies on everyone to implicitly trust your word. You are aware of what a hatters job would be, just as much as you know trust in a mafia game isn’t freely given like your asking. Ontop of that your asking for all the blues to claim to you? You have offered nothing but a plan with holes ones you knew were open. Also, if you were really the hatter, you would most likely have a bomb on me already, so are you willing to lay your life on the line Godfather? If your legit you would be able to put the dt the other person your dt confirmed in contact with the other dt liason and would let claiming possible to them. Shall we do this rationally then?
Once the two DTs are connected, you are no longer needed. So you should be willing to do your job.
First off, I am not asking anyone to take my word. I explained this already: I am putting myself out there with this claim. If I am red there is another town kp role who can point me out. As I said, you need to sacrifice a red to at least create some confusion. Are you willing to?
Second, I have no problem dying to prove my innocence. It's an odd plan though, since if I am red the damage is already done after I have the dt names: the rest of the mafia team know them. So your "plan" does nothing in fact, even if I am red.
So you're wrong on both counts. At this point I don't get why people can't see how obviously red you are. I say we lynch BloodyC0bbler for confirmation. If the other dt wants they can wait until your flip to talk to me. That is how sure I am you are red.
|
Notice: my proposal protects the DT identities in all cases. BC's does not. In fact, his plan offers nothing to "protect" the town.
I am a bit surprised how sloppy BC is playing right now. Panic mode I guess...
|
On July 24 2010 17:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 17:20 youngminii wrote: What information? I'm running under the assumption no 'important' information will be passed along. I hope they're smart enough not to tell each other what blue roles they've found. dude your trusting someone with a game breaking plan and assuming someone isn't going to pass information of whos been cleared (even if all you say is cleared) down a line. People screw up in pms all the time. the longer a mafia sits in with them with you the higher chance you have to screw up. BC is telling us here that the DTs should not coordinate with each other because there is a chance of a slip-up. Again, he is acting as red as can be, using his credibility to try to spread misinformation.
Vote for him in today's lynch and don't tell me the Dt names until you see BC flip GF. Easy win after that.
|
On July 24 2010 22:52 XeliN wrote: I'm going to ##vote SouthRawrea and DoubleLynch for now. I've barely had time to skim over this thread having been away from home and have to go out now as well.
I'd request people don't vote for me simply because I know this won't benefit the town, but I can understand if I'm a target due to suspicion or simply inactivity. Right. Please just choose between me and BC. No reason not to - this is where the town gets a break. One way or another: -)
|
Right, sadly for them they can't kill me for a while. By then it'll be too late. They also gave BC to us, so we're looking good!
|
BC is plainly not making sense. He is red. Stop trying to distract.
|
On July 25 2010 00:26 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2010 21:58 citi.zen wrote:On July 24 2010 17:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 24 2010 17:20 youngminii wrote: What information? I'm running under the assumption no 'important' information will be passed along. I hope they're smart enough not to tell each other what blue roles they've found. dude your trusting someone with a game breaking plan and assuming someone isn't going to pass information of whos been cleared (even if all you say is cleared) down a line. People screw up in pms all the time. the longer a mafia sits in with them with you the higher chance you have to screw up. BC is telling us here that the DTs should not coordinate with each other because there is a chance of a slip-up. Again, he is acting as red as can be, using his credibility to try to spread misinformation. Vote for him in today's lynch and don't tell me the Dt names until you see BC flip GF. Easy win after that. no, he actually has a really good point - that people screw up all the time. i can't tell you how many games i've been in where the dt's manage to start a blue circle, include one too any idiots and get the role info leaked to the mafia = dead blues; or inadvertently let the mafia directly into the PM circle = dead blues your plan is solid but not error proof nor fool proof, and we can't pretend like it is the reason to be careful is that this is basically THE GAME right here. if town screws up they lose it's over, if it works then town is sitting pretty OK - let's encourage discussion. DTs talking to each other: good or bad in your view?
|
On July 25 2010 01:20 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2010 01:02 citi.zen wrote:On July 25 2010 00:26 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On July 24 2010 21:58 citi.zen wrote:On July 24 2010 17:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 24 2010 17:20 youngminii wrote: What information? I'm running under the assumption no 'important' information will be passed along. I hope they're smart enough not to tell each other what blue roles they've found. dude your trusting someone with a game breaking plan and assuming someone isn't going to pass information of whos been cleared (even if all you say is cleared) down a line. People screw up in pms all the time. the longer a mafia sits in with them with you the higher chance you have to screw up. BC is telling us here that the DTs should not coordinate with each other because there is a chance of a slip-up. Again, he is acting as red as can be, using his credibility to try to spread misinformation. Vote for him in today's lynch and don't tell me the Dt names until you see BC flip GF. Easy win after that. no, he actually has a really good point - that people screw up all the time. i can't tell you how many games i've been in where the dt's manage to start a blue circle, include one too any idiots and get the role info leaked to the mafia = dead blues; or inadvertently let the mafia directly into the PM circle = dead blues your plan is solid but not error proof nor fool proof, and we can't pretend like it is the reason to be careful is that this is basically THE GAME right here. if town screws up they lose it's over, if it works then town is sitting pretty OK - let's encourage discussion. DTs talking to each other: good or bad in your view? lol no matter what role i am i would answer this question the same way, so essentially it is a nonquestion. try again! (the answer is that it is good) Basically my worry is that you need a way to deal with false claims. The mafia are at an advantage right now in terms of kills and I wouldn't be surprised if they decide to send in one of their players as a false DT representative in order to sacrifice himself, disrupt your plan, and buy them another day Situation: two people PM you claiming to be representatives of a Detective (they don't tell you his name). Now, since you know the name of the other DT or are at least in contact with him indirectly, we know one of these guys is a liar. How do you deal with this? We would have to publicly expose the names of the representatives, in order to spend a day role checking or lynching (double lynch?), which costs the town another 2 kills before the plan goes into effect. Is there another, cleaner, plan? Now one possible way to avoid this situation entirely is to have the remaining DT contact you himself, as you are confirmed town (unless there is a real vig/hatter out there and he is really really stupid or really really inactive). However, this still opens you up to false claims from the mafia, and in this case "your" DT can check one of the claimants (don't forget about the godfather!), thereby determining the innocence of the other. Still, you lose a night before getting the real DTs in touch with each other. And then, the possibilities of what happen during the night can destroy the plan entirely. The suicide bomber comes to mind. On the whole, this is a very powerful plan which is why i would expect mafia to interfere given that they haven't lost a member yet. Since the idea of the plan has already been set in motion it seems to me that the town has little choice but to participate - consider a scenario where the actual remaining DT is too nervous to contact citizen, and then citizen gets contacted my a mafia "detective." Since only 1 claim came to citizen, can he assume the innocence of this claimant? This scenario alone shows why we basically have no choice but to follow through with the plan now, and that the remaining DT needs to follow the plan and find a way to contact citizen. Personally, I'm not sure which method of contact is superior for the plan (representative to citi or actual DT to citi). Both have pros and cons here, can anyone else shed some light? Two things: if you trust me, you trust me DT. I got checked night 1 and personally chose night 2's check target. No way for the two of them to "play me". Second, multiple claims are fine. The mafia will give up 2 people. At night we investigate one of the competing groups. We get two reds either way.
Clear?
|
On July 25 2010 03:34 SiNiquity wrote: Well with 2 / 2 KP roles have claimed (Tricode Vigilante and Citi.zen Mad Hatter), and with no counter claims up to this point, it seems likely that they're both innocent. The only scenario I can imagine where even one of these players isn't innocent is if:
1. Mafia knew the identify of the other KP role (else this player could blow the whistle at any time). 2. Knew that the other KP role would be inactive today (maybe they posted something to this effect).
As far as I can tell, the only way 1. could be accomplished is if they had already infiltrated a DT circle. This then requires
3. Knew that the DT would be inactive today (as the DT would also know 1.)
I searched and it seems Misder is the only one that hasn't posted since the Tricode / Citi.zen claiming party and has hinted he would probably be inactive this go-around. I think everyone else has at least posted, though a few only dropped in some one liners just saying they were either active or trying to catch up and didn't reference Tricode / Citi.zen directly, so it could be they missed it.
Am I missing anything, or barring this outlandish scenario are Tricode and Citi.zen clean? Pretty good points: the mafia would need to know that the DT AND other KP role would be AFK today, yet only 1 person has failed to post.
So yes, me and Tricode are confirmed.
|
On July 25 2010 03:47 SouthRawrea wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2010 03:37 Pandain wrote:On July 25 2010 03:34 SiNiquity wrote: Well with 2 / 2 KP roles have claimed (Tricode Vigilante and Citi.zen Mad Hatter), and with no counter claims up to this point, it seems likely that they're both innocent. The only scenario I can imagine where even one of these players isn't innocent is if:
1. Mafia knew the identify of the other KP role (else this player could blow the whistle at any time). 2. Knew that the other KP role would be inactive today (maybe they posted something to this effect).
As far as I can tell, the only way 1. could be accomplished is if they had already infiltrated a DT circle. This then requires
3. Knew that the DT would be inactive today (as the DT would also know 1.)
I searched and it seems Misder is the only one that hasn't posted since the Tricode / Citi.zen claiming party and has hinted he would probably be inactive this go-around. I think everyone else has at least posted, though a few only dropped in some one liners just saying they were either active or trying to catch up and didn't reference Tricode / Citi.zen directly, so it could be they missed it.
Am I missing anything, or barring this outlandish scenario are Tricode and Citi.zen clean? Yeah, pretty sure. I had been thinking about this for a while now(past 20 minutes) and I was thinking up a couple of ideas. Would it be good for everyone just to pm roleclaim to either Tricode/Citizen. I mean, they're both clean. This could really really help us. And in the chance that a mafia will counter claim to be a kp town, than we have 3 suspects to deal with. DONT ROLECLAIM YET, NEED FEEBACK Sorry I'm back, I slept in today. This has caught my eye though because I have no choice but to counter claim Citi.zen here as if I claim later, I will become less and less believable which is not really good to the town assuming that one of us is the mafia which is most likely. Again, sorry for not being on early enough to respond to his claim. It should be fine as long as the DTs have not yet claimed to Citi.zen. Of course you "have no choice". You guys already gambled everything at this point and this is your last chance.
Now, you say you "slept in". I had no way of knowing that and no motive to gamble that you would be AFK. As I've said before, I was under no pressure what-so-ever when I claimed. You also say this:
On July 25 2010 03:52 SouthRawrea wrote: So far I've been trying to slip under the radar so I don't get lynched early on or killed at night. I've actually only placed one bomb thus far as I was a little hesitant to kill place two people at risk even if I suspect them. My only one at the moment is on chaoser but that was placed yesterday after seeing that he didn't get lynched. I decided to abstain from placing a second bomb because of the first vote placed on me by Bumat... I felt threatened. :/
## Vote Citizen for now Why "for now?" If you are the hatter (which I konw you aren't), you would 100% vote for me since you would 100% know I am lying. Yet you say "for now". Perhaps the mafia should have chosen a stronger player to do their counter-claim... but what do I know.
Lynching Southrawarea will confirm my claim once and for all... The mafia already gave up many names in the past 24h, so the town is in a better position. My DT has a lot of information, whatever happens to me.
|
Oh, right:
unvote ##vote SouthRawarea
|
BM: just to clarify, the SB kill goes through AT THE END of the night, correct? This is why they take with them any visitors - people need to put their actions through, right?
AKA: I cannot get killed the second after we lynch South.
|
Make sure you vote. As a town you gain nothing from delaying. Abstain helps the mafia.
|
|
|
|