EPTTL Mafia XXVIII - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 12:30 tree.hugger wrote: And this bandwagon against Hyperbola is just dumb. ## Vote Laxercannon why is it dumb | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Just in case to avoid modkill | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On July 18 2010 12:23 Hyperbola wrote: Hrm. Exactly what scum would do. Starting a bandwagon against me when I've accused one of their operatives. And SiNiquity, you took your time to write another rather lengthy post against me. I'm quite flattered but this is quite suspicious in my book. You almost seem on edge and unload the big guns on a random passerby on the street who looked you the wrong way. And as a semi-legitimate defense: I'm quite quiet in all of my games. Yes I have been mafia in some but I've also had my fair share of green and blue roles. You've picked the wrong person to act as your scapegoat bucko. Um... I'm not aligned with SiNiquity at all right now. I know nothing of him. However, I do know that your post seems really... odd, to say the least. Also, what is wrong with a lengthy post? His first lengthy post was just a list of names that have not contributed (I was on that list... hopefully I'm doing ok helping out the town as much as I can). His second lengthy response, I admit, is completely against you; but he has a point. Just because you were townie aligned before does not mean that you can act sketchy and get away with it. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
5] Hyperbola (Misder, Divinek, Pandain, Zeks, SiNiquity) 2] DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, citi.zen) 1] Amber[LighT] (jayme), 1] d3_crescentia (darthThienAn), 1] citi.zen (rastaban) 1] chaoser (~opz~) 1] Divinek (bumatlarge) 1] SiNiquity (Hyperbola) 7] abstain (BloodyC0bbler, LaXerCannon, youngminii, tricode, Pyrrhuloxia, Roffles, Foolishness) Not voting and in risk of modkill: 10 | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
The reason it was introduced in the first place what completely ridiculous. Nothing smart about any of it. We should lynch people for good reasons, not dumb ones. I'm still looking for more nominations for people to lynch. I think those three are a good start. Time to pick one, yes? How about I PM five people a list of the candidates in order, and then someone in the thread will choose a number from 1-3? | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
On July 18 2010 05:28 Bill Murray wrote: INCOGNITO IS NOT IN THIS GAME. YOU MUST VOTE OR ABSTAIN, OR BE MODKILLED. DAY ENDS IN 28 1/2 hours Wat... ##Vote BillMurray for thinking im not in this game. Plz don't modkill me gud zur... | ||
|
LaXerCannon
Canada558 Posts
On July 18 2010 13:45 tree.hugger wrote: The reason it was introduced in the first place what completely ridiculous. Nothing smart about any of it. We should lynch people for good reasons, not dumb ones. I'm still looking for more nominations for people to lynch. I think those three are a good start. Time to pick one, yes? How about I PM five people a list of the candidates in order, and then someone in the thread will choose a number from 1-3? or On July 18 2010 09:04 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: IF we wanted to do the random thing, we could tie it in advance to something numerical in one or both of the playoff games tonight. Like number of factories made by WeMade players, or that number divided by two, or taking the number of letters in each winning player's ID and looping back to 1 if it goes over 30. It wouldn't be random, but we could independently agree on it, and none of us could influence it in advance. We don't know the distribution of red/blue/green in the list so it is almost as good as random unless the reds get us to agree on a bad number (like maybe they get us to agree on something times 2, which would never land on the first person on the list). | ||
|
LaXerCannon
Canada558 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 13:45 tree.hugger wrote: The reason it was introduced in the first place what completely ridiculous. Nothing smart about any of it. We should lynch people for good reasons, not dumb ones. I'm still looking for more nominations for people to lynch. I think those three are a good start. Time to pick one, yes? How about I PM five people a list of the candidates in order, and then someone in the thread will choose a number from 1-3? but WHY was it ridiculous, WHY was it not smart, WHY were the reasons dumb. You might as well have not posted as there was no substance to what you just said | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
...it is frequently put forward early in the game as a strategy by newbie Scum, to try to divert the town from using their most powerful weapon. I am surprised he put it forward, it is definitely a bad plan and I think we should keep an eye on him. I have to agree with tree.hugger that this bandwagon of Hyperbola doesn't make sense, it seems more poor townie than scum since it is so obvious. got home late tonight so headed to bed, will catch up tomorrow and try and provide more useful information. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On July 18 2010 13:49 Incognito wrote: Wat... ##Vote BillMurray for thinking im not in this game. Plz don't modkill me gud zur... you've posted more than a lot of players. please stop posting in the thread if you are not a player. if you wish to replace in, ok. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
5] Hyperbola (Misder, Divinek, Pandain, Zeks, SiNiquity) 2] DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, citi.zen) 1] Amber[LighT] (jayme), 1] d3_crescentia (darthThienAn), 1] citi.zen (rastaban) 1] chaoser (~opz~) 1] Divinek (bumatlarge) 1] SiNiquity (Hyperbola) 8] abstain (BloodyC0bbler, LaXerCannon, youngminii, tricode, Pyrrhuloxia, Roffles, SouthRawrea, Foolishness) Not voting and in risk of modkill: 9] brownbear, chaoser, xelin, lakrismamma, Amber[LighT], Infundibulum, Subversion, ketomai, tree.hugger day ends in 19 hours | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
RNG vote sucks....I'm not following that. Infund is right, lynching inactive is better. -__-...And besides, long running tradition, shows people we mean business...Ya feel me home slice? | ||
|
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 18 2010 12:03 citi.zen wrote: A few comments on how I see the game going: 1. PMs are allowed so trust circles are the way to go. Sooner or later they will form because of Dt checks, medic protection, vet soaking up a hit when we know they are the lone vet, etc. When this happens we'll be in good shape. 2. BCs list is fine, but many people seem to miss its point entirely. 3. There is no roleblocker, but there is a suicide bomber. Be very careful with your circles. Speak through confirmed townies if possible. 4. We lynch an inactive and/or bad player day one. Hyperbola is a fine target. Bumatlarge is ok too, bringing grudges from prior games here can derail us for many pages. 5. I already voted for Darth, why is it not counted? I will likely change it, but still! Good post! Abstaining is stupid. Part of why suggesting voting for for inactive persons is to make that person become active to defend himself therefore we get more to read from and mafia cant hide in the inactives. I think Hyperbola has defended himself pretty well. ##vote LaxerCannon He is usually more active so get to it Laxer. | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
I dont feel he really defended himself well at all | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 18 2010 08:12 Jayme wrote: As far as I know they can't miss any votes at all. We have more of a chance to land on a townie with any day 1 method we choose simply due to the fact that there are 24 townies and 6 mafia...there is no way of avoiding this. As a matter of fact I would say we have a better chance of hitting a good red player through RNG because I mean...who's to say that this "good townie" isn't just a red being a good townie. I understand lynching an inactive is killing someone who wouldn't have helped anyway but you're still doing just that...just about guaranteeing a green lynch which is completely pointless. As I said before I'm willing to go with either, there isn't much we could do. The issue I see with RNG is verifying if it's actually RNG. Actually....I'm done for this....Let me read a little more and we'll see who I want to die.... Also, I'm tired of these idiotic plans. We can pm. Dt, check someone PM them, pass turn, check someone PM them and the other person, pass turn. Quit playing like idiots and realize the benefits of having PMs....Nubby ass mafioso. And go back and look at games with PM's day one, no body does anything that day... The best thing I could say is everyone Roleclaim to me, and lynch me today...Or wait til tomorrow and do it. I'd inform of match ups, over counts, and die out as proof. How does that sound? I can send the PM out, and inform before death of everyone who doesn't respond, over counts of roles, ect. ect. I could be checked night one if that would be a problem, (wouldn't recommend organized multi checking though) and lynched day 2. Even if I was god father, god father would be out and too many blues to snipe with a list of roles and over claims. *yawn* But I don't really wanna die too bad, or abuse how easy this game could be. | ||
| ||
