|
On July 26 2010 15:33 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:23 Pandain wrote:On July 26 2010 15:21 Divinek wrote:On July 26 2010 15:14 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
#vote SouthRawrea
#vote Pandain
I'm just going to start with who I know for 100% sure has lying. Hasn't worked well so far but I don't give a fuck. my logical trail takes me down the same path, ill likely end up on a liar as well for my other vote because if you're town for fuck sakes dont openly lie to the town, at least in such a stupid and poor manner Just to clear it up, I did NOT lie to town. I lied only to Youngmini because we were going to let him into the circle but had to be sure he wasn't GF(since he had checked green.). I did NOT lie to the town or jeopardize it, until Youngmini reaveled it, probably with good intentions :/. It was ???,Subversion, and I's secret expirement. If I still lived, than youngmini wasn't GF and we would let him in our group. That's the extent of my lie, to youngmini for one day. The pms with Subversion I posted verify this. Lying in PM = lying to town, because whoever gets your mail and catches you in a lie has an obligation to tell the town about it. Maybe if you are DT and check a red you can try lying to them to get more info but really that will probably just screw you over.
Again, that's true. I was going to tell Youngmini the truth if Citizen ended up being blue/green. However, within 30 seconds probably he already had told so................. yeah.
|
Also, Pandain, don't blame yourself entirely for subversion's death. You wouldn't have even been in a position to accidentally leak info about subversion if young hadn't called you out publicly like a fucking idiot.
|
On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion.
I find it more amusing you think im dumb enough to multiclaim to people. I'm smart enough to know I'd be outted for something like that. But then again, with half the crap going on this game, the low level of thinking doesn't surprise me.
|
On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion.
Can you provide any definite proof of your claim of BC?
I would like an explanation that isn't bullshit or a manipulative of what actually occurred.
If you can provide me with that information then I will ignore BC and vote for him.
|
i blame tricode for all of this
if he played to win instead of shooting BC on a personal vendetta none of this would have happened
|
I know you deny that South was mouthpiece and that you are MH. I'm lynching you for trying so goddamn hard to get citi.zen lynched yesterday instead of South.
You fuck with town, town fucks with you. If you really aren't red, I'm sorry, but your play has been too scummy for me, and I trust Pandain a hell of a lot more than I trust you. Thus, I'm voting for you, and if there's gonna be someone to change my mind it sure as hell isn't going to be you.
|
....You guys talk a lot...I was going to vote you BC, and I promised to long before this bandwagon began....And I've done it already once this game....But it's far to early for the day to end, so I would like some suspects and analysis. You can do some on me if you'd like, I'm pretty thoroughly scummy looking. But the point is, I would like something to analyze after you die. Remember sir, death brings knowledge and truth. So please, at least help us out with that. Uncooperative actions now will just further your scum appearance, and whats more important, you living, or the town winning. Besides, you might sway enough votes.
|
On July 26 2010 15:40 Tricode wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion. Can you provide any definite proof of your claim of BC? I would like an explanation that isn't bullshit or a manipulative of what actually occurred. If you can provide me with that information then I will ignore BC and vote for him.
1) BC decided my roleclaiming plan was idiotic, despite the fact that it benefits town.
2) BC decided instead of going for South (who was 99% confirmed mafia) we should go for citi.zen. You see how that turned out.
3) BC hasn't really been sparking town discussion, he's been flaming people, calling every plan stupid, deriding every player as playing poorly, etc. This is very scummy, as he is intentionally trying to break down town unity rather than build it.
4) BC has been on the wrong side of every vote so far.
You want more? I've got more.
|
EBWOP:
And likely enough my own vote...I gotta go look back at when citizen was alive...but I always distrust you. Lol.
|
On July 26 2010 15:41 BrownBear wrote:
I know you deny that South was mouthpiece and that you are MH. I'm lynching you for trying so goddamn hard to get citi.zen lynched yesterday instead of South.
You fuck with town, town fucks with you. If you really aren't red, I'm sorry, but your play has been too scummy for me, and I trust Pandain a hell of a lot more than I trust you. Thus, I'm voting for you, and if there's gonna be someone to change my mind it sure as hell isn't going to be you.
Rofl. Dude I criticized a plan with holes. Hey look, tree.hugger, chaoser, and infundi did as well but your not going for them. Your also ignoring obvious liars. Hell. I would even except that after the full day if people want me offed, then sure. Instead we have people such as yourself saying everyone should ignore my ruckus, and instead just majority lynch me as fast as possible.
If that isnt a scum move what is? Your moving to deny someone a chance to save their-self. Hell, so far my talking today has been so confusing. In fact so confusing that it makes sense? Why would you be trying to stop the flow of any form of discussion, rash lynches and no talking benefits mafia, not town.
|
On July 26 2010 15:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion. I find it more amusing you think im dumb enough to multiclaim to people. I'm smart enough to know I'd be outted for something like that. But then again, with half the crap going on this game, the low level of thinking doesn't surprise me.
1.Rastaban had said(before revealing who DT is) that there was a triple claim.
This is true. Therefore Rastaban did have a DT or had inflitrated. However, Zeks could easily have said"You didn't have a DT".
Subversion and zeks' person are dts. Therefore Rastaban's "DT" is not.
Its whether Rastaban is more trust worthy than you and I believe he is.
|
Hey BC, plz post your PM's with South and Rastaban. Please copy and paste them, not type them. Thanks in advance.
|
On July 26 2010 15:43 BrownBear wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:40 Tricode wrote:On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion. Can you provide any definite proof of your claim of BC? I would like an explanation that isn't bullshit or a manipulative of what actually occurred. If you can provide me with that information then I will ignore BC and vote for him. 4) BC has been on the wrong side of every vote so far.
Not bothering with the rest of your post, but this is demonstrably false. Anyone can go back and read my vote list at the bottom of Page 132 and see that you either have a very poor memory or are lying.
|
On July 26 2010 15:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:41 BrownBear wrote:
I know you deny that South was mouthpiece and that you are MH. I'm lynching you for trying so goddamn hard to get citi.zen lynched yesterday instead of South.
You fuck with town, town fucks with you. If you really aren't red, I'm sorry, but your play has been too scummy for me, and I trust Pandain a hell of a lot more than I trust you. Thus, I'm voting for you, and if there's gonna be someone to change my mind it sure as hell isn't going to be you. Rofl. Dude I criticized a plan with holes. Hey look, tree.hugger, chaoser, and infundi did as well but your not going for them.
I was under the impression they were all next to die too....
|
More importantly, BC's death gives us something concrete to go off of.
Much like Day 3 where Tricode red ==> BC red, we now have BC not red ==> South and Rasta red.
So it's a win/win for town. Either get one red (BC) or two (South & Rasta).
|
On July 26 2010 15:48 SiNiquity wrote:
More importantly, BC's death gives us something concrete to go off of.
Much like Day 3 where Tricode red ==> BC red, we now have BC not red ==> South and Rasta red.
So it's a win/win for town. Either get one red (BC) or two (South & Rasta).
I wish it were so but sadly we have a double lynch. So its a mafia/innocent or mafia mafia. Still gives us info, but not us win/win
|
On July 26 2010 15:46 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Hey BC, plz post your PM's with South and Rastaban. Please copy and paste them, not type them. Thanks in advance.
On July 26 2010 15:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 14:51 SiNiquity wrote:
Also BC, while you're here. Do you deny PMing Rasta and South? You probably only have minutes left at this rate. That I do. I could name you the players I have pm'd and they would most likely confirm that they have had some form of messages with me.
|
On July 26 2010 15:43 BrownBear wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:40 Tricode wrote:On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion. Can you provide any definite proof of your claim of BC? I would like an explanation that isn't bullshit or a manipulative of what actually occurred. If you can provide me with that information then I will ignore BC and vote for him. 1) BC decided my roleclaiming plan was idiotic, despite the fact that it benefits town. 2) BC decided instead of going for South (who was 99% confirmed mafia) we should go for citi.zen. You see how that turned out. 3) BC hasn't really been sparking town discussion, he's been flaming people, calling every plan stupid, deriding every player as playing poorly, etc. This is very scummy, as he is intentionally trying to break down town unity rather than build it. 4) BC has been on the wrong side of every vote so far. You want more? I've got more.
Your roleclaim plan was flamed by more than me, don't try to finger me on that.
South was analyzed and pulled out by me? then I went for a person who turned out to be lying and whos plan lost tons of credibilty for it.
Surprise, surprise, I was wrong about his alignment, but correct on his plan being riddled with issues.
Sparking town discussion? I have been doing so since I got back from work, hell, i started the discussion on citizen's plan that till then everyone was like "YEA LETS AUTO TRUST 100%" and the guy was lying.
As for wrong side of vote so far? Citizen flipped liar. Amberlight has not flipped period, nor has pandain, and look pandain has turned out to be a liar as well.
Dude, if you want to analyze and finger me to death, care to well not blatantly lie?
|
On July 26 2010 15:47 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:43 BrownBear wrote:On July 26 2010 15:40 Tricode wrote:On July 26 2010 15:35 BrownBear wrote:
Guys, why are you even bothering arguing with BC. He's mafia. He's just trying to cause as much ruckus as possible before he gets lynched and has to shut up.
Just ignore him and the problem will resolve itself. In a very short, terminal fashion. Can you provide any definite proof of your claim of BC? I would like an explanation that isn't bullshit or a manipulative of what actually occurred. If you can provide me with that information then I will ignore BC and vote for him. 4) BC has been on the wrong side of every vote so far. Not bothering with the rest of your post, but this is demonstrably false. Anyone can go back and read my vote list at the bottom of Page 132 and see that you either have a very poor memory or are lying.
Day 1: He votes for Pandain. I believe Pandain is green, thus I believe him to be voting for the wrong person for the wrong reasons.
Day 2: He votes for Amber[light]. Again, a person who i believe is green. Again, wrong side of a vote.
Day 3: He votes for citi.zen. Very wrong side of a vote.
Your point was?
|
On July 26 2010 15:49 SiNiquity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:46 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Hey BC, plz post your PM's with South and Rastaban. Please copy and paste them, not type them. Thanks in advance. Show nested quote +On July 26 2010 15:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 26 2010 14:51 SiNiquity wrote:
Also BC, while you're here. Do you deny PMing Rasta and South? You probably only have minutes left at this rate. That I do. I could name you the players I have pm'd and they would most likely confirm that they have had some form of messages with me.
What what what!?
He denies any contact....
Eh, I can believe it. I've only received PM from zeks and tree.hugger. I don't feel too loved sittin over here. lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
