|
On July 01 2010 06:45 Roffles wrote: Solely based upon the notion that you didn't show, especially after you said you would have. Now that we know your situation, I take back what I said before.
I'm glad we have that straightened out, now I can be lynched in peace. I'm sorry you think I'm a total douchebag simply because i'm refusing to help the town. It's unfortunate, because I am a strong believe in retributive justice. I've said before that I would help you if I'm alive tomorrow. That is my sole condition and I am going to see it through until the end. I will, however, if I feel any change of heart in the next three hours, leave a list of suspects and my reasoning behind them with another mason. Then again, I might not. Good luck to you, and remember:
There's still one more hocrux out there
|
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On July 01 2010 06:31 Jugan wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 06:31 JeeJee wrote:On July 01 2010 06:30 Jugan wrote:On July 01 2010 06:29 JeeJee wrote:On July 01 2010 06:29 Jugan wrote:On July 01 2010 06:28 JeeJee wrote: yes i would also, i forgot amber's votes count as 2.5 you're dead get the fuck out of here mr ron pretty sure you're townie, but i'm also 100% sure you're bad. lol i haven't even said anything to you and you're shit talking. kk mafia. so your suspect list is amber and me. kay. we'll see after the game is over how bad you are no, it's not, but you're a douchebag data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" you vote amber, so you think he's mafia (unless you're a townie that votes for townies -- given your general fuck-town attitude i wouldn't be surprised) and you jus called me mafia keep on jumpin' thru dem hoopz it's more like a fuck-YOU attitude. This is pretty much all we need to see from you. We understand you're pissed because we lynched you when you weren't here. Lemme tell you this again. We thought you just didn't wanna show for name claiming, and what didn't help you was that you posted "Oh, gimme like 30 minutes to reread" and then disappeared promptly afterwards. Now that we understand the situation, we apologize. But you have to understand it's part of the game. Hell, we lynched Lakris based off a mini lead, but mostly because he was away even though it was a big whatever he had in his country. It's all part of the game. Lakris took it well, but why can't you just do the same?
We already tried reasoning it out with you. But we can't take back our actions. Least you can do now is help us out a bit with what you know.
|
On July 01 2010 06:50 Roffles wrote: Least you can do now is help us out a bit with what you know.
On July 01 2010 06:49 Jugan wrote:I'm glad we have that straightened out, now I can be lynched in peace. I'm sorry you think I'm a total douchebag simply because i'm refusing to help the town. It's unfortunate, because I am a strong believer in retributive justice. I've said before that I would help you if I'm alive tomorrow. That is my sole condition and I am going to see it through until the end. I will, however, if I feel any change of heart in the next three hours, leave a list of suspects and my reasoning behind them with another mason. Then again, I might not. Good luck to you, and remember: There's still one more hocrux out there data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Also, my reasoning is that there are many more reasons as to why you should be lynching someone else. Think about it. There are 11 people left in the game. Can you really afford to lynch a blue? Several people have either blatantly lied or contradicted themselves throughout this game, and yet you're still going to lynch me with that lying around. Am I being a dick? Yeah, I am, because I think you're being a dick to me. Is it selfish and immature? Yes, but so are your actions.
|
Well now we have two plans of checks for the night proposed so far. Which do we want to actually go with?
On July 01 2010 03:22 YellowInk wrote: I suggest Thegilaboy investigate Roffles, Radfield investigate ~OpZ~, and JeeJee investigate Jayme.
On July 01 2010 06:18 JeeJee wrote: anyway in terms of claims so we have the following chars:
harry-amber ron-jugan hermione-jayme neville-yink scrimgeour-rad aberforth-roffles ginny-jspazz flitwick-gila
in terms of side characters, we have rad, yink and roffles so our checks should include those 3 first n foremost
i will be checking yink, rad shall be checking roffles and gila shall be checking rad
alternatively, we can choose to lynch one of them
Also, sorry about your cat Jugen
|
Thanks gil, I hope she's in a better place
|
@BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know).
|
On July 01 2010 07:13 YellowInk wrote: @BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know). He probably thinks I'm mafia. Lol....
Anyway, no... Gilaboy should investigate YI.
Radfield should still investigate me. (Just because I want to see my clue...)
|
On July 01 2010 07:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 07:13 YellowInk wrote: @BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know). He probably thinks I'm mafia. Lol.... Anyway, no... Gilaboy should investigate YI. Radfield should still investigate me. (Just because I want to see my clue...) Why would you wish Gilaboy to investigate me... again?
|
On July 01 2010 08:02 YellowInk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 07:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:On July 01 2010 07:13 YellowInk wrote: @BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know). He probably thinks I'm mafia. Lol.... Anyway, no... Gilaboy should investigate YI. Radfield should still investigate me. (Just because I want to see my clue...) Why would you wish Gilaboy to investigate me... again? Oh my bad...Then Radfield should investigate you and Gilaboy should investigate me....Kk that clears everything up...I forgot which investigated you for a minute. Haha
|
On July 01 2010 08:03 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 08:02 YellowInk wrote:On July 01 2010 07:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:On July 01 2010 07:13 YellowInk wrote: @BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know). He probably thinks I'm mafia. Lol.... Anyway, no... Gilaboy should investigate YI. Radfield should still investigate me. (Just because I want to see my clue...) Why would you wish Gilaboy to investigate me... again? Oh my bad...Then Radfield should investigate you and Gilaboy should investigate me....Kk that clears everything up...I forgot which investigated you for a minute. Haha Oh wait...Radfield said he investigated you...Damn....Hmm....How to figure out this puzzle then...Hold on...Ok...Yea, Radfield def should investigate me...Lol...I'm trippin...Gilaboy should prob look at Roffles...
|
No...gilaboy should investigate me...-_-...Radfield should investigate Roffles...
|
So many options I see. I take it there is I reason you're shifting my investigation around between Roffles and yourself?
|
On July 01 2010 08:05 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 08:03 ~OpZ~ wrote:On July 01 2010 08:02 YellowInk wrote:On July 01 2010 07:55 ~OpZ~ wrote:On July 01 2010 07:13 YellowInk wrote: @BM I'm a little confused, why is the current voting setup L-1? If everyone who hasn't voted votes for someone else, Jugan is still lynched - in other words, the majority have voted for Jugan. Why are we not in twilight?
@Jugan If you really are green/blue and playing this way, you are being unsportsmanlike. If you're red, it's cool that you're being disruptive and it's a good thing we got our important business out of the way already.
So, if you're green/blue, since BM is sitll letting you talk, you should spill absolutely everything you know (not what you speculate, just what you know). He probably thinks I'm mafia. Lol.... Anyway, no... Gilaboy should investigate YI. Radfield should still investigate me. (Just because I want to see my clue...) Why would you wish Gilaboy to investigate me... again? Oh my bad...Then Radfield should investigate you and Gilaboy should investigate me....Kk that clears everything up...I forgot which investigated you for a minute. Haha Oh wait...Radfield said he investigated you...Damn....Hmm....How to figure out this puzzle then...Hold on...Ok...Yea, Radfield def should investigate me...Lol...I'm trippin...Gilaboy should prob look at Roffles... Glad we agree.
|
On July 01 2010 08:07 ~OpZ~ wrote: No...gilaboy should investigate me...-_-...Radfield should investigate Roffles... I disagree. And why would you care anyway? Worried that Radfield can find something that Thegilaboy can't?
|
On July 01 2010 08:09 Thegilaboy wrote: So many options I see. I take it there is I reason you're shifting my investigation around between Roffles and yourself? Well...I really want Radfields clue on myself, but since you say you don't get clues, just alignment I'd rather you investigate me. If I come up DE, then we will know who the two DE are.(I'd rather Radfield getting a clue on someone else that has a shaky name claim too, but if I come up mafia, Jspazz and YI are mafia...
Ya dig? Lol.
|
|
On July 01 2010 08:09 Thegilaboy wrote: So many options I see. I take it there is I reason you're shifting my investigation around between Roffles and yourself? Who did you investigate last night?
|
Well considering that I thought ~OpZ~ was a death eater anyway and he just got modkilled, I guess alls well that ends well.
The reason I wanted Radfield to investigate ~OpZ~ in particular is because we have a godfather to deal with. Godfathers tend to be in the light and ~OpZ~ has definitely been much more in the light. Thegilaboy's investigation would fail to uncover this godfather role.
|
On July 01 2010 08:15 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2010 08:09 Thegilaboy wrote: So many options I see. I take it there is I reason you're shifting my investigation around between Roffles and yourself? Who did you investigate last night?
I've only done the two investigations thus far, YellowInk and johnnyspazz, both coming up protown.
|
|
|
|