|
On June 26 2010 04:15 Amber[LighT] wrote:
I will say this ONCE AGAIN:
IF YOU WERE A DT AND SEARCHED FOR SOMEONE AND DISCOVERED A SHADY CHARACTER.....
..maybe now is the time to come forward?
We can't guarantee you will be safe for another night and we need to get these clues analyzed, especially if you're having trouble figuring out who the characters are.
Considering there is only 4 scum, if you found someone that was a death eater, even Voldemort (whom we can't kill yet), you should definitely come forward. Consider that if you get killed and revealed as a DT (assuming we don't have a second medic that decided to cover), we'll know for sure that that person was Voldemort.
Coming forward will probably just get you roleblocked into oblivion, though. I suspect the death eaters have a great deal of magic at their disposal.
Oh, and consider me half-asking for medic protection again. Though now you can give me just 50% likely protection (if you think I'm town) since there's probably only one medic out there. I advise using an RNG for your final decision on this sort of thing. If a DT shows up, that would obviously be an awesome target for protection too. Lets keep the mafia guessing.
|
johnny you have the power of spazzspam
|
Along with Radfield's plan, I'm putting my vote on zeks. He was moderately productive day 1 and has been far less productive day 2. I don't know that he's red, but it follows the pattern we're looking for much better than others. I flipped through the total inactives and they honestly are all playing very noobishly. Since zeks has been posting but content since daybreak has heavily slacked, that's where I'm dropping my vote.
|
As an additional note, even if I weren't voting zeks, voting Abenson does not fit with Radfield's plan. Going after Abenson at the beginning of the day makes sense to pressure him to talk. Going after Abenson at the end of the day is likely ambush bandwagoning a townie.
|
BM, I can't find the post where the ministry of magic banned the word mafia, but I see it has been edited into the OP. When was this put into place?
Also, what is a paranoid gun owner? It's not listed in the rules either. If it's what I think it is, how did he die alone?
|
I only questioned paranoid gun owner because PGO dying alone is exceptionally rare. It's usually a pretty good role in the hands of a skilled townie because you get to take down a mafioso with you when they use their KP.
I guess He Who Must Not Be Named personally killed this one. That or someone was giving a serial killer + vet in the same role, though I think the former much more likely.
If rules get changed, please post them in thread as well so we don't have to accidentally notice their addition in the OP.
|
The typical definition is PGO kills whomever targets them except for lynches. So if a medic tries to cover the PGO, the medic dies. If a mafioso goes to kill a PGO, the mafioso and the PGO both die.
|
PGOs can be mafioso or 3rd party as well, of course.
|
A5J wants to role reveal, his logic is flawed. If this happened, don't reveal. A5J gets my lynch vote.
Medics were asked to self protect, so it probably didn't happen anyway. But if medic protected DT investigating Hes, A5J is calling that DT a death eater.
|
No, I don't think revealing a medic and a DT for no gain is good for the town.
|
Well I guess that depends on the definition of the PGO role which our mod is choosing not to provide to us. Also, even assuming the rest of it, medic could be protecting DT, DT investigates Hes, medic covers DT, HWMNBN hits PGO, assuming PGO has infi shots we still have medic outing DT and medic for no gain.
For one example.
|
On June 27 2010 19:39 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2010 18:12 JeeJee wrote:On June 27 2010 17:19 Roffles wrote:On June 27 2010 17:12 JeeJee wrote:
so we killing voldy or what How the hell are we killing Voldy with horcruxes out there? why, i'm glad you asked! i know nagini, we just need to find the hidden horcrux also chez, how the hell did you confuse leglocker with body bind.. O-o c'mon ;P either way draco's good too that was my mistake
BM, you can't say things like this. I PM'd you the last time you did this. Now I'm posting. This can't keep happening.
I would post this in a separate thread, but I don't see a general discussions thread that might be more applicable. If there's a better place to talk about this sort of thing, please point me in the right direction.
|
@ JeeJee/LM/~OpZ~ shenanigans:
I think it would be a good idea to wait untill JeeJee himself confirms LM is Nagini. Who is to say that ~OpZ~ isn't just twisting this whole thing? Remember that lynches occur when majority is hit, not just at end of day. My vote isn't going for a LM into JeeJee lynch untill I hear the words from the horse's mouth.
|
I'll keep this short.
The facts:
I am town aligned as has been vouched for by jspazz.
A hit on me was blocked.
I was covered by someone who believes I am town.
My action was not roleblocked.
Thus this implies:
Amber[Light] is either lying or perhaps some bus driving occurred.
Please read carefully the bus driver role - it switches the abilities between two targets - it is not based on the caster. So if someone did a bus drive on me with any other person, it would have swapped the hit, the role block, and the episky all to someone else.
Well obviously that didn't happen. Amber[Light] did not target me with a role block.
Amber[Light]'s voting has been suspect throughout - I'll let someone else elaborate on this as I'm a bit short on time at the moment to do the digging require to display. If no one gets to it, I'll put something together in four hours or so.
Time to lynch Amber[Light].
|
Quick erratum. I just realized that I did mispost. I was writing quickly. I meant to say that I was vouched for by Thegilaboy (2) (prev Subversion).
|
I would just like to say that there's something someone could say right now that is not a roleclaim in any way shape or form that would convince me you're a townie. I'm actually surprised it hasn't happened yet.
Are we going to let Amber[Light]'s lie stand or lynch?
|
On June 29 2010 12:43 johnnyspazz wrote:
so right now, the only fact that doesn't add up is amber's roleblock?
So far as I can see, yes.
|
On June 29 2010 12:52 Thegilaboy wrote:
Hey YellowInk, why did you vote for AFJ last chance we had? We had a lead on nagini and you voted for AFJ with no explanation?
There was an explanation. Please read the thread. I have a clear post associated with each vote and the vote was cast before the nagini lead.
|
On June 29 2010 13:15 Thegilaboy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2010 13:07 YellowInk wrote:On June 29 2010 12:52 Thegilaboy wrote:
Hey YellowInk, why did you vote for AFJ last chance we had? We had a lead on nagini and you voted for AFJ with no explanation? There was an explanation. Please read the thread. I have a clear post associated with each vote and the vote was cast before the nagini lead. Ah shit, there it is, my bad YI.
No problem. This game is a cluster.
|
Abenson, I hope you're not pro town. If that is indeed a PM you received, you just got modkilled. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
